Skip to main content

Beneficent Bullshit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Remaking Economics: Eminent Post-War Economists ((EPWE))

Abstract

Political-economic life is rife with bullshit: false, often nonsensical, beliefs. Some of those beliefs are socially productive. James M. Buchanan identifies popular false beliefs in the constitutional realm as foundational supports of political-economic order. I consider how popular false beliefs in the judicial realm support criminal law and order. The beneficence of bullshit in such arenas may help explain the prevalence of bullshit in political-economic life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Or at least it has been historically—up through the mid-twentieth century, after which Buchanan (1970) sees such beliefs as deteriorating.

  2. 2.

    And the logical structure of American government is that described in The Calculus of Consent (1962). As Buchanan puts it, that book simply “provide[s] a tight logical structure to what must have been the essential vision of James Madison and the Founding Fathers in their conceptualization of the workings of a political order” (Buchanan 1988, p. 16).

References

  • Beard, C. A. (1913). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1988). Is Public Choice Immoral? The Case for the ‘Nobel’ Lie. Virginia Law Review, 74, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Munger, M. (2014). The Soul of James Buchanan? Independent Review, 18, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1970). The ‘Social’ Efficiency of Education. Il Politico, 35, 653–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1988). This Week’s Citation Classic. Current Contents, 2, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2012a). Ordeals. Journal of Law and Economics, 55, 691–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2012b). An Austrian Approach to Law and Economics, with Special Reference to Superstition. Review of Austrian Economics, 25, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2014). Anarchy Unbound: Why Self-Governance Works Better Than You Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2017). WTF?! An Economic Tour of the Weird. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T., & Coyne, C. J. (2012). Sassywood. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40, 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T., & Suarez, P. A. (2015). Superstition and Self-Governance. Advances in Austrian Economics, 19, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. A. (2003). To Form a More Perfect Union: A New Economic Interpretation of the United States Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1991). The Republic: The Complete and Unabridged Jowett Translation (B. Jowett, trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987). The Calculus: Postscript After 25 Years. Cato Journal, 7, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1987). Courts, Legislatures, and Constitutional Maintenance. Cato Journal, 7, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Solomon Stein for sharing the letters from Buchanan ’s archives that motivate this chapter. My discussion draws on previous work in Leeson (2012a, 2012b, 2017), Leeson and Coyne (2012), and Leeson and Suarez (2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter T. Leeson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leeson, P.T. (2018). Beneficent Bullshit. In: Wagner, R. (eds) James M. Buchanan. Remaking Economics: Eminent Post-War Economists. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03079-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03080-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics