Skip to main content

Resolving Our Judgments: Understanding How Ruins Acquire and Exhibit Aesthetic Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Ruins Acquire Aesthetic Value
  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter briefly reflects on the implications of the case studies of Chaps. 3 and 4 and then proposes solutions to the conflicting viewpoints regarding contemporary ruins. It also outlines the work’s central philosophical argument. I explain how ruined environments acquire new aesthetic value in the wake of their ruination. If ruined environments eventually acquire significant aesthetic value, this vindicates our attention to them, as well as the photography and other aesthetic works we create that have been inspired by them. I also maintain that many of our most famous ruins, such as the Roman Colosseum, acquired their present value through a similar process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I do not assess in detail the selected-effects theory of function they present in this work.

  2. 2.

    Glenn Parsons and Allen Carlson, Functional Beauty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008), 137.

  3. 3.

    It may be difficult to truly change some US gas stations, for example. See James Lileks, “Old gas stations live on in new guises: Old gas stations frequently find new uses, but you can always tell what they once were,” Minneapolis Star-Tribune, April 11, 2015, http://www.startribune.com/old-gas-stations-live-on-in-new-guises/299337711/#1.

  4. 4.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 143.

  5. 5.

    Roger Scruton, The Aesthetics of Architecture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979), 40.

  6. 6.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 145.

  7. 7.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 146.

  8. 8.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 148.

  9. 9.

    Edward Winters, “Architecture,” in The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 3rd edition, edited by Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes (New York: Routledge, 2013), 634.

  10. 10.

    Beth Preston, “Why Is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function,” Journal of Philosophy 95 (1998): 215–254.

  11. 11.

    Zucker, “Ruins—An Aesthetic Hybrid,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1961), 128.

  12. 12.

    Donald Crawford, “Nature and Art: Some Dialectical Relationships,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (1983), 53.

  13. 13.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 163, n. 40.

  14. 14.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 162.

  15. 15.

    Parsons and Carlson, Functional Beauty, 164.

  16. 16.

    Robert Stecker, review of Functional Beauty, in The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2011), 440.

  17. 17.

    For related ideas about functions, see Rafael De Clercq, “Reflections on a Sofa Bed: Functional Beauty and Looking Fit,” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (2013), especially the section “Is There a Hierarchy of Functions?” De Clercq writes that “original functions are more important than acquired functions because, although acquired functions may change the appearance of an object, it seems that they can also be safely ignored when it has to be determined which aesthetic properties the object exemplifies (as in the case of the perfume bottle that is serving as a bud vase)” (46).

  18. 18.

    Of course this further distinction may not comport with Parsons and Carlson’s theory of selected effects, and, in some cases, perhaps the proper functions with which Parsons and Carlson are concerned are the ones that will be most dominant or important for most long-lasting structures.

  19. 19.

    Basil Spence, Phoenix at Coventry: The Building of a Cathedral—by Its Architect (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), 18.

  20. 20.

    Andrew Ballantyne, “Architecture, Life, and Habit,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2011), 47.

  21. 21.

    Jeanette Bicknell, “Architectural Ghosts,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2014), 440.

  22. 22.

    Michael S. Roth, Irresistible Decay: Ruins Reclaimed (Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities, 1997), 7.

  23. 23.

    From “The Ethical Criticism of Art,” in Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Jerrold Levinson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 182.

  24. 24.

    Scruton, The Aesthetics of Architecture, 17.

  25. 25.

    Article “Ruine,” in Vol. XIV of the Encyclopédie (Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert, editors); quoted in Michel Makarius, Ruins (Paris: Flammarion, 2004), 81.

  26. 26.

    Ballantyne, “Architecture, Life, and Habit,” 47.

  27. 27.

    Though in my view they have not entirely erased them.

References

  • Ballantyne, Andrew. “Architecture, Life, and Habit.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2011): 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, Jeanette. “Architectural Ghosts.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2014): 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Donald. “Nature and Art: Some Dialectical Relationships.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (1983): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, Rafael. “Reflections on a Sofa Bed: Functional Beauty and Looking Fit.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (2013): 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis, and Jean le Rond d’Alembert, editors. “Ruine.” In Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc. XIV. 1765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaut, Berys. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Jerrold Levinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lileks, James. “Old Gas Stations Live on in New Guises: Old Gas Stations Frequently Find New Uses, but You Can Always Tell What They Once Were.” Minneapolis Star-Tribune, April 11, 2015. http://www.startribune.com/old-gas-stations-live-on-in-new-guises/299337711/#1.

  • Makarius, Michel. Ruins. Translated by David Radzinowicz. Paris: Flammarion, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Glenn, and Allen Carlson. Functional Beauty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Beth. “Why Is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function.” Journal of Philosophy 95 (1998): 215–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Michael S., with Claire Lyons, and Charles Merewether. Irresistible Decay: Ruins Reclaimed. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, Roger. The Aesthetics of Architecture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Basil. Phoenix at Coventry: The Building of a Cathedral—By Its Architect. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecker, Robert. “Review of Functional Beauty.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2011): 439–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Edward. “Architecture.” In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 3rd ed., edited by Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Paul. “Ruins—An Aesthetic Hybrid.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1961): 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whitehouse, T. (2018). Resolving Our Judgments: Understanding How Ruins Acquire and Exhibit Aesthetic Value. In: How Ruins Acquire Aesthetic Value. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03065-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics