Skip to main content

A User Modeling Pipeline for Studying Polarized Political Events in Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11153))

Abstract

This paper presents a user modeling pipeline to analyze discussions and opinions shared on social media regarding polarized political events (e.g., public polls). The pipeline follows a four-step methodology. First, social media posts and users metadata are crawled. Second, a filtering mechanism is applied to filter spammers and bot users. As a third step, demographics information is extracted out of the valid users, namely gender, age, ethnicity and location information. Finally, the political polarity of the users with respect to the analyzed event is predicted. In the scope of this work, our proposed pipeline is applied to two referendum scenarios (independence of Catalonia in Spain and autonomy of Lombardy in Italy) in order to assess the performance of the approach with respect to the capability of collecting correct insights on the demographics of social media users and of predicting the poll results based on the opinions shared by the users. Experiments show that the method was effective in predicting the political trends for the Catalonia case, but not for the Lombardy case. Among the various motivations for this, we noticed that in general Twitter was more representative of the users opposing the referendum than the ones in favor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.faceplusplus.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://genderize.io/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.geonames.org/.

References

  1. Ambekar, A., et al.: Name-ethnicity classification from open sources. In: ACM SIGKDD (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avello, G., et al.: Limits of electoral predictions using Twitter. In: ICSWM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bekafigo, M.A., McBride, A.: Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(5), 625–643 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budak, C., et al.: Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Publ. Opin. Q. 80(S1), 250–271 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: ICWSM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, C.A., et al.: BotOrNot: a system to evaluate social bots. In: WWW (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrara, E.: Disinformation and social Bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22(8) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gayo-Avello, D.: A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from twitter data. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(6), 649–679 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurka, D.B., Godoy, A., Zuben, F.J.V.: Online social network analysis: a survey of research applications in computer science. CoRR abs/1504.05655 (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05655

  10. Kwak, H., et al.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leetaru, K., et al.: Mapping the global twitter heartbeat: the geography of twitter. First Monday 18(5) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis-Beck, M.: Election forecasting: principles and practice. Br. J. Politics Int. Relat. 7(2) (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mellon, J., Prosser, C.: Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: political attitudes and demographics of British social media users. Res. Polit. 4(3) (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mislove, A., et al.: Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mustafaraj, E., Metaxas, P.T.: From obscurity to prominence in minutes: political speech and real-time search (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ratkiewicz, J., et al.: Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In: WWW (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romero, D.M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: Influence and passivity in social media. CoRR abs/1008.1253 (2010). http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1253

  19. Sloan, L., Morgan, J.: Who tweets with their location? Understanding the relationship between demographic characteristics and the use of geoservices and geotagging on Twitter. PloS one 10(11), e0142209 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takikawa, H., Nagayoshi, K.: Political polarization in social media: analysis of the “Twitter political field” in Japan. CoRR abs/1711.06752 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06752

  21. Varol, O., et al.: Online human-Bot interactions: detection, estimation, and characterization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03107 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Bozzon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Napoli, R., Ertugrul, A.M., Bozzon, A., Brambilla, M. (2018). A User Modeling Pipeline for Studying Polarized Political Events in Social Media. In: Pautasso, C., Sánchez-Figueroa, F., Systä, K., Murillo Rodríguez, J. (eds) Current Trends in Web Engineering. ICWE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03056-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03056-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03055-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03056-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics