Skip to main content

Overview of Global Coordination on Bio-Nonproliferation and Its Limits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defense Against Biological Attacks

Abstract

More than ever, infectious diseases are an issue of international importance. However, related research, increasing knowledge and technologies often bear dual-use aspects as an immanent risk of misuse, e.g. for development and proliferation of biological weapons. In this chapter, relevant programmes, regulations and binding international agreements are introduced to give an overview of activities concerning bio-nonproliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Like the spread of infectious diseases agents, access to clean water and sanitary facilities, reproductive health and mother-child health.

  2. 2.

    After political difficulties in 2014, Russia was suspended from being part of the G8 group. Although Russia was welcomed back to the group, they did not attend a further meeting of the G8 so far.

  3. 3.

    Due to their connection to the GHSA, IHR are not included in Chapter I although they are legally binding (binding in terms of international law).

References

  1. Definition of dual use research of concern (DURC). 2013 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/durc/en/.

  2. John Hart RT. Science, technology, and the biological weapons convention. 2012 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2012_10/Science-Technology-and-the-Biological-Weapons-Convention#hart.

  3. Geneva Protocol. [cited 2017]. Available from: https://unoda-web.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/assets/WMD/Bio/pdf/Status_Protocol.pdf.

  4. Biological and toxin weapons convention. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/C4048678A93B6934C1257188004848D0/$file/BWC-text-English.pdf.

  5. Becker-Jakob U. Balanced minimalism – The biological weapons convention after its 7th review conference. PRIF-Report No. 120. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regional groups in the biological weapons convention. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/%28httpPages%29/73C3C49BEA5621A0C12572DB00477B4A?OpenDocument.

  7. Milton Leitenberg RAZ. The Soviet Biological Weapons Program – a history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandré Gould PF. Project Coast: Apartheid’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme. Geneva: United Nations Publication; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zilinskas RA. Iraq’s biological weapons. The past as future? JAMA. 1997;278(5):418–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The confidence building measures (CBMs). [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/5E2E8E6499843CCBC1257E52003ADED4?OpenDocument.

  11. Findlay T. Verification and the BWC: last gasp or signs of life? 2006 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_09/BWCVerification.

  12. Bansak KC. Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process. 2011 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/print/4902.

  13. Gerstein DM. National security and arms control in the age of biotechnology: the biological and toxin weapons convention. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2013. p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. BWC meeting of states parties (10–14 December 2012). [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/89835CB0A2DAA4A0C1257B6E003415C5?OpenDocument.

  15. Eighth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. 2016 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/F277FA6A2B96BA98C125807A005B2F59/$file/2016-1129+Final+report+adv+vers.pdf.

  16. Seventh Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. 2011 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/C2BAA955E58E15C7C1257D01005260D3/$file/BWC_CONF.VII_07.pdf.

  17. Robertson SP, et al. Frontometaphyseal dysplasia: mutations in FLNA and phenotypic diversity. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(16):1726–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Convention on biological diversity. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/.

  19. Bagley MA, Rai AK. The Nagoya protocol and synthetic biology research: a look at the potential impacts. Washington, DC: Wilson Centre; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagoya Protocol. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/abs/nagoya-protocol/.

  21. Access and benefit-sharing clearing-house. Available from: https://absch.cbd.int/.

  22. Smallpox. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/smallpox/en/.

  23. Damon IK, Damaso CR, McFadden G. Are we there yet? The smallpox research agenda using variola virus. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(5):e1004108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WHO Advisory Committee on Variola Virus Research: Report of the Eighteenth Meeting, Geneva. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Security Council Resolution 1540. 2004 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1540%282004%29.

  26. Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) [on non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons]. 2004 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=voting&index=.VM#x0026;term=sres1540%20(2004)#focus.

  27. Australia Group. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.australiagroup.net/en/.

  28. CBW Events. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.cbw-events.org.uk/.

  29. Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI). [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.ghsi.ca/english/index.asp.

  30. Global Health Security Initiative. Available from. https://ec.europa.eu/health/preparedness_response/cbrn_threats/ghsi_en.

  31. Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI). Available from: https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/international/ghsi/pages/default.aspx.

  32. De Cock KM, et al. The new global health. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(8):1192–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee K, Collin J. Global change and health. Maidenhead. Open University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rowson M, et al. Conceptualising global health: theoretical issues and their relevance for teaching. Glob Health. 2012;8:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kickbusch I. Global health – a definition. Available from: https://www.ilonakickbusch.com/kickbusch/global-health/.

  36. Omran AR. The epidemiologic transition. A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971;49(4):509–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nations U. Millennium development goals report 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McInnes C, Lee K. Health, security and foreign policy. Rev Int Stud. 2006;32:5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heymann DL, et al. Global health security: the wider lessons from the west African Ebola virus disease epidemic. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1884–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. The G8 global partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction, in G8 summit. Kananaskis, Canada; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Report on the G8 global partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction, in G8 summit. Deauville, France; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  42. EU CBRN risk mitigation centres of excellence initiative. Available from: http://www.cbrn-coe.eu/.

  43. EU CBRN CoE initiative: 5th round table meeting for Central Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  44. CBRN Centres of Excellence. Available from: http://www.unicri.it/topics/cbrn/coe/.

  45. Global Health Security Agenda. [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.ghsagenda.org.

  46. WHO, editor. International Health Regulations (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Kloth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hecht, M., Kloth, S., Lee, MH. (2019). Overview of Global Coordination on Bio-Nonproliferation and Its Limits. In: Singh, S., Kuhn, J. (eds) Defense Against Biological Attacks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03053-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics