Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Environmental Geoinformatics pp 597–626Cite as

Environmental Impact Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1201 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is defined by Munn [2] as the need to identify and predict the impact on the environment and on man’s health and well-being of legislative proposals, policies, programs, projects, and operational procedures, and to interpret and communicate information about the impact. EIA is thus a process, a systematic process that examines the environmental consequence of development actions in advance [3, p. 4]. Glasson et al. [3] have defined the purpose of EIA as an aid to decision making, an aid to the formulation of the development actions, and an instrument to sustainable development . In order to achieve these goals, EIA requires monitoring data that can be used to identify and predict impacts, and also to evaluate the impacts of a given project once approved. Whereas EIA has been traditionally restricted to projects that are deemed to have significant impacts on the environment, it has recently expanded to include strategic environmental assessment (SEA) discussed in Sect. 33.4 and sustainability assessment (SA) presented in Sect. 33.5.

Distances and locations are the important determinants of many choices that economists study. Economists often rely on information about these variables that are self-reported by respondents in surveys, although information can sometimes be obtained from secondary sources. Self-reports are typically used for information on distances from households or community centers to roads, markets, schools, clinics, and other public services. There is growing evidence that self-reported distances are measured with errors and that these errors are correlated with the outcomes of interest. In contrast to self-reports, global positioning systems (GPS) can determine locations to within 15 m in most cases. The falling cost of GNSS receivers makes it increasingly feasible for field surveys to use GNSS to more accurately measure locations and distances.

—J. Gibson and D. MacKenzie [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., http://www.water.wa.gov.au/sites/gss/ggs.html.

  2. 2.

    Environmental Protection Authority.

  3. 3.

    Environmental water requirement.

  4. 4.

    Environmental impact statements (EIA).

  5. 5.

    Environmental protection statement.

References

  1. Gibson J, MacKenzie D (2007) Using global positioning systems in household surveys for better economics and better policy. World Bank Res Obs 22(2):217–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Munn RE (1979) Environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (2005) Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge, 3rd edn. New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sweeney International Management Corp (2009) Environmental Impact Assessment for Kelly Cove Salmon Ltd. proposed aquaculture site relocation for Sand Point, Boston Rock, and Hartz Point. Submitted to NS Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture. SIMCorp. File #SW2008-016, 017 & 018

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perry B, Gessler W (2000) Physical access to primary health care in Andean Bolivia. Social Sci Med 50(9):1177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00364-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar N (2007) Spatial sampling for collecting demographic data. America, March, New York, pp 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smit B, Spalding H (1995) Methods for cumulative effects assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15(1):81–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(94)00027-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Downes BJ, Barmuta LA, Fairweather PG, Faith DP, Keough MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP (2002) Monitoring ecological impacts: conceipts and practise in flowing waters. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Munier N (2004) Multicriteria environmental assessment. A practical guide. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geneletti D (2007) An approach based on spatial multicriteria analysis to map the nature conservation value of agricultural land. J Environ Manage 83:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Antunes P, Santos R, Jorda OL (2001) The application of geographical information systems to determine environmental impact significance. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:511–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry of Environment and Energy, Government of Ontarion (1990) Evaluation methods in environmental assessment, pp. 3–12, 33–51; 112–137

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ashton Mining Ltd (1991) In: by, (ed) Mt Weld rare earths project: sites evaluation study for a rare earths Secondary Processing Plant, report prepared. Kinhill Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Rashdan D, Al-Kloub B, Dean A, Al-Shemmeri T (1999) Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. Eur J Oper Res 118:30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00079-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shopley J, Fuggle R (1984) A comprehensive review of current EIA methods and techniques. J Environ Manage 18:25–47

    Google Scholar 

  16. Westman WE (1985) Ecology, impact assessment, and environmental planning. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gough JD, Ward JC (1996) Environmental decision making and land management. J Environ Manage 48(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Therivel R (2004) Strategic environmental assessment in action. Earthscan, Sterling VA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Regan HM, Colyvan M, Markovchick-Nicholls L (2006) A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. J Environ Manage 80(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marttunen M, Haimailaiinen RP (1995) Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Eur J Oper Res 87:551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Annandale D, Lantzke R (2000) Making good decisions: a guide to using decision-aiding techniques in waste facility siting. Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, Institute for environmental science

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteriadecision making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(3):251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int J Geog Inform Syst 5(3):321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Janssen R (2001) On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands. J Multi-criteria Decision Anal 10:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J (2000) Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environ Manage 26:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hajikowicz SA (2007) Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. J Environ Manag https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.020.

  28. Bojorquez-tapia LA, Sanchez-colon S, Martinez AF (2005) Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis. Environ Manag 36:469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manage 1(2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinemann A (2001) Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess 21:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Varma VK, Ferguson I, Wild I (2000) Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manage 128:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M (2005) Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For Ecology Manage 207:171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hajikowicz SA, McDonald GT, Smith PN (2000) An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting technique in natural resource management. J Environ Plann Manage 43(4):505–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lantzke R (2006) MCA: the weighting process and overall comments on a weighting process. Environmental Science, Murdoch University. Unpublished. Available at password restricted URL: 16 http://lms.murdoch.edu.au/webct/urw/lc152224987001.tp152225013001/RelativeResourceManager/Template/content/10_13evaluation/three-mca-wt-mthds.pdf (Accessed 15/04/2008)

  36. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Saaty TL (1987) Analytical hierarchy process what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ashton Mining Ltd (1992) Mt Weld rare earths project: public environmental review, report prepared by. Kinhill Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  39. Australian Water Resource (2005) Combined water management area: Gnangara Mound. http://www.water.gov.au/RegionalWaterResourcesAssessments/SpecificGeographicRegion/TabbedReports.aspx?PID=WA_GW_51x. (Accessed on 8/03/2008)

  40. Department of Water (2008) Gnangara mound - a unique water resource. http://portal.water.wa.gov.au/portal/page/portal/WaterManagement/Groundwater/Gnangara/ (As of 14/03/08)

  41. Water Authority of WA (1995) Review of proposed changes to environmental conditions -Gnangara Mound groundwater resources (Section 46), Water Authority. of WA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Department of Water (2007) Environmental management of groundwater abstraction from the gnangara roundwater mound 2004–05, annual compliance report to the Environmental Protection Authority, July 2004 to June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  43. McArthur WM (1986) The Gnangara Mound landforms, soils and vegetation. Gnangara Mound Environmental Review and Management Programme, Water Authority WA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sorensen JC (1971) A framework for the identification and control of resource degradation and conflict in multiple use of the coastal zone. University of Carlifornia, Berkeley, Department of Landscape Architecture

    Google Scholar 

  45. Haklay M, Feitelson E, Doytsher Y (1998) The potential of a GIS-based scoping system: an isreali proposal and case study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18:439–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mattiske EM (1994) Monitoring the effects of groundwater extraction on native vegetation on the Nortrhern Swan Coastal Plain. EM Mattiske and associates

    Google Scholar 

  47. Water Authority of WA (1992) Gnangara Mound vegetation stress study results of investigation, Report No WG 127, Water Authority. of WA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Groom BPK, Froend RH, Mattiske EM (2000) Impact of groundwater abstraction on woodland, Swan Coastal Plain, WA. Ecol Manage Restor 1:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jasinska EJ, Knott B (1991) Stability of root mat ecosystem in groundwater stream: cabaret cave. University of Western Australia, Yanchep National Park, WA

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sadler B, Verheem R (1996) SEA: status, challenges and future directions, Report 53. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wood C, Djeddour M (1991) Strategic environment assessment of policiees, plans and programmes. Impact Assess Bull 10(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Noble B (2002) Strategic environmental assessment of canadian energy policy. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 20(3):177–188. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154602781766681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spaling H, Smit B (1993) Cumulative environmental change: conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives. Environ Manage 17(5):587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Commonwealth Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Review of commonwealth environmental impact assessment. Canberra: CEPA 10

    Google Scholar 

  55. Scace R (2000) Vital relationship: complementary responsibilities of government and proponent in scoping. In: Kennedy A (ed) Cumulative environmental effects management: tools and approaches. Alberta association of professional biologists, Edmonton, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  56. BHP Billiton Iron Ore (2005) Marillana creek (Yandi) mine - environmental management plan. Pty Ltd Revision:3

    Google Scholar 

  57. EPA (1988) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project, report and recommendations of the environmental protection authority, bulletin 323. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  58. EPA (1992) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project - change of ministerial condition due to increase in rate of production, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 622. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  59. EPA (1994) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project - change of environmental conditions due to increase in rate of production, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 738. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  60. EPA (1995) Duplication of iron ore mining operation, Yandi mine ML 270SA, Hamersley Range, 90 km north west of Newman, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 802. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  61. EPA (Environmental Protection Authority) (2005) Marillana creek (Yandi) mine life of mine proposal, mining leases 270SA and 47/292, 90 km north-west of Newman. Report and recommendation of the EPA, assessment no 1555, Bulletin 1166. Perth, WA

    Google Scholar 

  62. Government of Western Australia (2003) Hope for the future: the western Australian state sustainability strategy. Department of the Premier and Cabinet Perth, Western Australia. http://www.sustainability.dpc.wa.gov.au/docs/Final%20Strategy/SSSFinal.pdf (Accessed on 2/03/2008)

  63. Pope J (2006) What’s so special about sustainability assessment? J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8:v–x. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pope J, Grace W (2006) Sustainability assessment in context: issues of process, policy, and governance. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8:373–398. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualizing sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Morrison-Saunders A, Therivel R (2006) Sustainability integration and assessment. J Environ Assess Policy and Manage 8(3):281–298. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2–3):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gibson R (2006) Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8(3):259–280. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lee M (2006) Bridging the gap between theory and practise in integrated assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28:57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hacking T, Guthrie P (2006) Sustainable development objectives in impact assessment: why are they needed and where do they come from? J Environ Assess Policy Manag 8(3):341–371. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ferrarini A, Bodini A, Becchi M (2001) Environmental quality and sustainability in the province of Reggio Emilia (Italy): using multi-criteria analysis to assess and compare municipal performance. J Environ Manage 63:117–131. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0465

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spatial Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Joseph Awange

  2. Department of Geospatial and Space Technology, University of Nairobi , Nairobi, Kenya

    John Kiema

Authors
  1. Joseph Awange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Kiema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Awange .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Awange, J., Kiema, J. (2019). Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Environmental Geoinformatics. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03017-9_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation