Skip to main content

Identifying Goals of Agents by Learning from Observations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1002 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11248))

Abstract

The intention recognition problem is a difficult problem which consists in determining the intentions and the goals of an agent. Solving this problem is useful when they are several agents which are interacting with each other and when they do not know each other. The effectiveness of an agents’ work could be improved in this case. We present a method to infer the possible goals of an agent by observing him in a series of successful attempts to reach them. We model this problem as a case of concept learning and propose an algorithm to produce concise hypotheses. However, this first proposal does not take into account the sequential nature of our observations and we discuss how we can infer better hypotheses when we can make some assumption about the behavior of the agents and use background knowledge on the dynamics of the environment. We then provide a simple way to enrich our data by assuming the agent can compute the effects of his actions in the next step and study the properties of our proposal in two different settings. We show that our algorithm will always provide a possible goal if such a goal exists (meaning that there is indeed some set of states in which the agent always succeeds and stops in our observations).

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17H00763.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vered, M., Pereira, R.F., Magnaguagno, M.C., Meneguzzi, F., Kaminka, G.A.: Online goal recognition as reasoning over landmarks. In: The AAAI 2018 Workshop on Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldman, R.P., Friedman, S.E., Rye, J.M.: Plan recognition for network analysis: preliminary report. In: The AAAI 2018 Workshop on Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. E-Martin, Y., Smith, D.E.: Goal recognition with noisy observations. In: AAAI Workshop 2017, Palo Alto, California, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mirsky, R., Stern, R., Gal, Y., Kalech, M.: Plan recognition design. In: AAAI Workshop 2017, Palo Alto, California, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Michael Young, R.: Toward combining domain theory and recipes in plan recognition. In: AAAI Workshop 2017, Palo Alto, California, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt, C.F., Sridharan, N.S., Goodson, J.L.: The plan recognition problem: an intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 11(5), 45–83 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charniak, E., Goldman, R.P.: A Bayesian model of plan recognition. Artif. Intell. 64(5), 53–79 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geib, C.W., Goldman, R.P.: A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars. Artif. Intell. 173, 1101–1132 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Carberry, S.: Techniques for plan recognition. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(5), 31–48 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang, J.: A preference-based interpretation of other agents’ actions. In: International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Conference 2004, vol. 04, pp. 33–42. AAAI, Whistler (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. E-Martin, Y., R-Moreno, M.D., Smith, D.E.: Practical goal recognition for ISS crew activities. In: International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henniche, M.: MGI: an incremental bottom-up algorithm. In: Australian New Zealand Intelligent Information Systems Conference 1994, pp. 347–351. IEEE, Brisbane (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, W.W.: Trees and rules with set-valued features. In: AAAI Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial intelligence 1996, Portland, Oregon, vol. 1, pp. 709–716 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Lorthioir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lorthioir, G., Bourgne, G., Inoue, K. (2018). Identifying Goals of Agents by Learning from Observations. In: Kaenampornpan, M., Malaka, R., Nguyen, D., Schwind, N. (eds) Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence. MIWAI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11248. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03014-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03014-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03013-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03014-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics