Skip to main content

Numerical Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stokes–Darcy Equations

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics ((LNMFM))

  • 841 Accesses

Abstract

The algorithms described in Chap. 7 are implemented in the C++ finite element code ParMooN (Wilbrandt et al., Comput Math Appl 74(1):74–88, 2017). In this chapter several examples from the literature are introduced and numerical results shown. To begin with, a more general discussion on numerical examples is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is occasionally called direct numerical simulation (DNS).

  2. 2.

    In fact it is also possible to have a right-hand side g ∈ L 2(Ω) in the equation ∇⋅u = g. While the saddle point theory covers this case as well, fluids are divergence-free and so examples are expected to respect this.

  3. 3.

    Iterative solution algorithms for the Steklov–Poincaré equations (6.16) and (6.17) use a preconditioner which adds to the complexity of each iteration, which has to be taken into account, see also at the end of Sect. 7.4.

  4. 4.

    The surfaces sometimes intersect (especially for larger γ p and larger K) which is not correctly visible in the figure. However the presentation is clearer without these intersections.

  5. 5.

    As a general similarity let a, b > 0. If γa + b < ε for some ε, then a < εγ and b < ε. That means if a and b are equations and γ large, equation a is fulfilled with a higher accuracy compared with b.

References

  1. Wenbin Chen, Max Gunzburger, Fei Hua, and Xiaoming Wang. A parallel robin-robin domain decomposition method for the Stokes-Darcy system. SIAM J. Numerical Analysis, 49(3):1064–1084, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfonso Caiazzo, Volker John, and Ulrich Wilbrandt. On classical iterative subdomain methods for the Stokes-Darcy problem. Comput. Geosci., 18(5):711–728, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Cardenas and J.L. Wilson. Dunes, turbulent eddies, and interfacial exchange with permeable sediments. Water Resour. Res., 43:08412, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.B. Cardenas and J.L. Wilson. Hydrodynamics of coupled flow above and below a sediment–water interface with triangular bedforms. Adv. Water Resour., 30:301–313, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Discacciati and A. Quarteroni. Navier-Stokes/Darcy coupling: modeling, analysis and numerical approximation. Revista Matematica Complutense, 22(2):315–426, 2009.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Marco Discacciati, Alfio Quarteroni, and Alberto Valli. Robin-Robin domain decomposition methods for the Stokes-Darcy coupling. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 45(3):1246–1268, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilbrandt, U. (2019). Numerical Results. In: Stokes–Darcy Equations. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics(). Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02904-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics