Abstract
We apply social network analysis to examine school choice in the second-largest Russian city Saint-Petersburg. We use online data (“digital footprints”) of between-schools comparisons on a large school information resource shkola-spb.ru. This resource allows to identify clusters of city schools that have been compared to each other more often and thus reflect choice preferences of students and parents looking for a school.
Network analysis is conducted in R (‘igraph’ package). For community detection, we employed fast-greedy clustering algorithm (Good et al. 2010). The resulting communities (school clusters) have been placed on a city map to identify territorial patterns formed according to choice preferences.
Network analysis of the district school networks based on between-schools online comparisons reveals two main factors for community formation. The first factor is territorial proximity: users compare schools that are relatively close to each other and not separated by wide streets, parks, industrial areas, rivers, etc. The second grouping principle is the type of school: private schools always form a separate cluster which shows that they are not being compared with public schools. In one district there was also a cluster of elite or academically challenging public schools grouped together.
E. Williams—Independent Researcher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In 2015 and 2016 the limit for nominations was 5 schools, in 2017 - 3 schools.
References
Alba, R.D., Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J., Marzan, G., Zhang, W.: Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 446–460 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2657495
Alexandrov, D., Tenisheva, K., Savelieva, S.: Differentiation of school choice: case of two districts of St. Petersburg. Educational Studies (Moscow) (2018, in press)
Berends, M.: Sociology and school choice: what we know after two decades of charter schools. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 41, 159–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
Betts, J.R., Loveless, T. (eds.) Getting Choice Right: Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC (2005)
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., Wilson, D.: What parents want: school preferences and school choice. Econ. J. 125(587), 1262–1289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12153
Charles, C.Z.: The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 29(1), 167–207 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100002
Clapp, J.M., Nanda, A., Ross, S.L.: Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. J. Urban Econ. 63(2), 451–466 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.03.004
Demintseva, E.: Labour migrants in post-Soviet Moscow: patterns of settlement. J. Ethnic Migr. Stud. 43(15), 2556–2572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1294053
Gibbons, S., Machin, S.: Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: evidence from house prices. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 24(1), 99–119 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn008
Gibbons, S., Machin, S., Silva, O.: Choice, competition, and pupil achievement. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6(4), 912–947 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.4.912
Good, B.H., de Montjoye, Y.A., Clauset, A.: Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. Phys. Rev. E 81(4), 046106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046106
Gulson, K.N., Symes, C.: Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters. Routledge, New York (2007)
Hastings, J.S., Weinstein, J.M.: Information, school choice, and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. Q. J. Econ. 123(4), 1373–1414 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373
Hoxby, C.M.: School choice and school productivity. Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In: The Economics of School Choice. University of Chicago Press (2003)
Lovenheim, M.F., Walsh, P.: Does choice increase information? Evidence from online school search behavior. Econ. Educ. Rev. 62, 91–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.002
Lubienski, C., Lee, J.: Geo-spatial analyses in education research: the critical challenge and methodological possibilities. Geogr. Res. 55(1), 89–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12188
Schneider, M., Buckley, J.: What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 24(2), 133–144 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002133
Taylor, Ch.: Geographical information systems (GIS) and school choice: the use of spatial research tools in studying educational policy. In: Gulson, K.N., Symes, C. (eds.) Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters. Routledge, New York (2007)
Website http://www.shkola-spb.ru/. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
Yastrebov, G., Pinskaya, M., Kosaretsky, S.: Using contextual data for education quality assessment. Russ. Educ. Soc. 57, 483–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2015.1096140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ivaniushina, V., Williams, E. (2018). School Choice: Digital Prints and Network Analysis. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02842-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02843-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)