Abstract
We apply social network analysis to examine school choice in the second-largest Russian city Saint-Petersburg. We use online data (“digital footprints”) of between-schools comparisons on a large school information resource shkola-spb.ru. This resource allows to identify clusters of city schools that have been compared to each other more often and thus reflect choice preferences of students and parents looking for a school.
Network analysis is conducted in R (‘igraph’ package). For community detection, we employed fast-greedy clustering algorithm (Good et al. 2010). The resulting communities (school clusters) have been placed on a city map to identify territorial patterns formed according to choice preferences.
Network analysis of the district school networks based on between-schools online comparisons reveals two main factors for community formation. The first factor is territorial proximity: users compare schools that are relatively close to each other and not separated by wide streets, parks, industrial areas, rivers, etc. The second grouping principle is the type of school: private schools always form a separate cluster which shows that they are not being compared with public schools. In one district there was also a cluster of elite or academically challenging public schools grouped together.
E. Williams—Independent Researcher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2015 and 2016 the limit for nominations was 5 schools, in 2017 - 3 schools.
References
Alba, R.D., Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J., Marzan, G., Zhang, W.: Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 446–460 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/2657495
Alexandrov, D., Tenisheva, K., Savelieva, S.: Differentiation of school choice: case of two districts of St. Petersburg. Educational Studies (Moscow) (2018, in press)
Berends, M.: Sociology and school choice: what we know after two decades of charter schools. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 41, 159–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
Betts, J.R., Loveless, T. (eds.) Getting Choice Right: Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC (2005)
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., Wilson, D.: What parents want: school preferences and school choice. Econ. J. 125(587), 1262–1289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12153
Charles, C.Z.: The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 29(1), 167–207 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100002
Clapp, J.M., Nanda, A., Ross, S.L.: Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. J. Urban Econ. 63(2), 451–466 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.03.004
Demintseva, E.: Labour migrants in post-Soviet Moscow: patterns of settlement. J. Ethnic Migr. Stud. 43(15), 2556–2572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1294053
Gibbons, S., Machin, S.: Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: evidence from house prices. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 24(1), 99–119 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn008
Gibbons, S., Machin, S., Silva, O.: Choice, competition, and pupil achievement. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6(4), 912–947 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.4.912
Good, B.H., de Montjoye, Y.A., Clauset, A.: Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. Phys. Rev. E 81(4), 046106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046106
Gulson, K.N., Symes, C.: Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters. Routledge, New York (2007)
Hastings, J.S., Weinstein, J.M.: Information, school choice, and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. Q. J. Econ. 123(4), 1373–1414 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1373
Hoxby, C.M.: School choice and school productivity. Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In: The Economics of School Choice. University of Chicago Press (2003)
Lovenheim, M.F., Walsh, P.: Does choice increase information? Evidence from online school search behavior. Econ. Educ. Rev. 62, 91–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.002
Lubienski, C., Lee, J.: Geo-spatial analyses in education research: the critical challenge and methodological possibilities. Geogr. Res. 55(1), 89–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12188
Schneider, M., Buckley, J.: What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 24(2), 133–144 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002133
Taylor, Ch.: Geographical information systems (GIS) and school choice: the use of spatial research tools in studying educational policy. In: Gulson, K.N., Symes, C. (eds.) Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters. Routledge, New York (2007)
Website http://www.shkola-spb.ru/. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
Yastrebov, G., Pinskaya, M., Kosaretsky, S.: Using contextual data for education quality assessment. Russ. Educ. Soc. 57, 483–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2015.1096140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ivaniushina, V., Williams, E. (2018). School Choice: Digital Prints and Network Analysis. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02842-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02843-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)