Abstract
In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Antonopulos, A.: Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Crypto-Currencies. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2014)
Bancroft, A., Reid, P.S.: Challenging the techno-politics of anonymity: the case of cryptomarket users. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(4), 497–512 (2017)
Bjerg, O.: How is bitcoin money? Theory Cult. Soc. 33(1), 53–72 (2016)
Blanc, J.: Making sense of the plurality of money: a polanyian attempt. In: SASE 29th Annual Meeting (Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics), Lyon, France (2017)
Carnwell, R., Carson, A.: The concepts of partnership and collaboration. In: Carnwell, R., Buchanan, J. (eds.) Effective Practice in Health, Social Care and Criminal Justice: A Partnership Approach. Open Universities Press, Maidenhead (2008)
Clemons, E., Dewan, R., Kauffman, R., Weber, Th.: Understanding the information-based transformation of strategy and society. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32(2), 425–456 (2017)
Cusumano, M.: Technology strategy and management: the bitcoin ecosystem. Commun. ACM 57(10), 22–24 (2014)
Danaher, J., Hogan, M., Noone, Ch., et al.: Algorithmic governance: developing a research agenda through the power of collective intellingence. Big Data Soc. 4(2), 1–21 (2017)
Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., Potts, J.: Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. J. Inst. Econ. (Online), 1–20 (2018)
Dos Santos, R.: On the philosophy of bitcoin/blockchain technology, Is it a chaotic, complex system? Metaphilosophy 48(5), 620–633 (2017)
Ethereum White Paper. A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper#applications. Accessed 17 Mar 2018
Greengard, S.: Internet of Things. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)
Kiayias, A., Russell, A., David, B., Oliynykov, R.: Ouroboros: a provably secure proof-of-stake blockchain protocol. In: Katz, J., Shacham, H. (eds.) CRYPTO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10401, pp. 357–388. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63688-7_12
Manski, S.: The building the blockchain world, Technological commonwealth or just more of the same. Strat. Chang. 26(5), 511–522 (2017)
Moore, D., Rid, T.: Cryptopolitik and the darknet. Surviv. Glob. Polit. Strat. 58(1), 7–38 (2016)
Nakamoto, S.: Bitoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2018
Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Reijers, W., O’Brolchain, F., Haynes, P.: Governance in blockchain technologies & social contract theories. Ledger 1(1), 134–151 (2016)
Scott, B., Loonam, J., Kumar, V.: Exploring the rise of blockchain technology: towards distributed collaborative organizations. Strat. Chang. 26(5), 423–428 (2017)
Sherin, V.: Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strat. Chang. 26(5), 499–509 (2017)
Swam, M., De Filippi, P.: Towards a philosophy of blockchain: a symposium. Metaphilosophy 48(5), 603–619 (2017)
Swan, M.: Blockchain. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2015)
Velasko, P.: Computing ledgers and the political ontology of the blockchain. Metaphilosophy 48(5), 712–726 (2017)
Vikram, D., Metcalf, D., Hooper, M.: Blockchain Enabled Applications: Understand the Blockchain Ecosystem and How to Make It Work for You. Apress, Orlando (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported with a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 18-011-00756 A “Study of citizens participation and building digital government”).
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smorgunov, L. (2018). Blockchain and a Problem of Procedural Justice of Public Choice. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02842-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02843-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)