Environmental Labelling of Buildings

  • Sašo MedvedEmail author
  • Suzana Domjan
  • Ciril Arkar
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)


Actions and goals towards sustainable societies should address the design, construction and use of buildings. The building sector has significant impact on the use of natural resources and the quality of the environment. Recent studies shown that half of natural resources used are related to the building sector. At the same time, the construction and operation of buildings are responsible for the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions. The European Commission has adopted several directives regarding improved energy efficiency, the wider use of renewable energy, and the use of sustainable materials and products to guide designers and evaluate the impact of buildings in all stages of their life cycle. In this chapter, the most widespread methods for the environmental labelling of products based on the life cycle assessment approach and methods for the holistic certification of buildings’ environmental impact are presented.


  1. Allen JG et al (2016) The 9 foundations of a healthy building. Harvard T.H. Chan, School of Public HealthGoogle Scholar
  2. BREEAM UK (2018) Technical manual SD5078: BREEAM UK new constructions 2018. Non-domestic Buildings, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  3. Domjan S (2016) Parametric models for multi-criteria analysis of nearly zero-energy buildings. Master thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebert T, Essig N, Hauser G (2011) Green building certification systems. Detail Green BooksGoogle Scholar
  5. EC JRC, IES (2010) ILCS (International Reference Life Cycle Data System) handbook, analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment. EC Joint Research Centre & Institute for Environment and SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  6. EPA (2012) TRACI 2.1. (Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and other Environment Impacts). EPA Environmental Protection Agency, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (2018) Level(s): a guide to Europe’s new reporting framework for sustainable buildings. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  8. Goedkoop M et al (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Ministrie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheeer (Ministry of VROM)Google Scholar
  9. Huijbregts MAJ et al (2016) ReCiPe 2016 v 1.1: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. RIVM report 2016-0104a. Bilthoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Humbert S et al (2012) IMPACT 2002+: user guide. Life Cycle Assessment Expert, Quantis, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  11. IMPACT 2002+ (2010) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle InventoriesGoogle Scholar
  12. ISO (2012) Environmental labels and declarations, how ISO standards help. ISO Central SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  13. McKinsey and Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy, V2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Behrens III JRWW (1972) The limits of growth. The Club of RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2013) Overview and methodology. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  16. UNCED (1992) Agenda 21Google Scholar
  17. UNOPS (2009) A guide to environmental labels—for procurement practitioners of the United Nation systemGoogle Scholar
  18. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common futureGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations