Skip to main content

Experimental Performance Evaluation of BLE 4 Versus BLE 5 in Indoors and Outdoors Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Body Area Networks I

Part of the book series: Internet of Things ((ITTCC))

Abstract

This paper focus on an experimental performance evaluation of the recently published Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) 5 technology. Measurements have been conducted both in indoors and outdoors scenarios. Performance of BLE 5 is compared to a previous release of BLE 4 which is currently the most used technology in commercial wireless healthcare and medical devices. This new improved BLE version may continue fostering the success of BLE use in those application scenarios as well as enable novel Internet of Things solutions. The main goal of this work was to evaluate, experimentally, the communications range and throughput performance of BLE 5 coded version which claims to provide fourfold improvement to the previous version of BLE. Measurement results obtained using the Nordic Semiconductor nRF52840 chipset are reported for indoor and outdoor cases relevant to healthcare and medical scenarios. Results show the practical communications range and throughput of the BLE 5 coded version, giving insight about the possible application space improvements for BLE technology. Specifically, our measurements showed that BLE 5 coded mode provides approximately 9 dB radio link budget gain compared to BLE 4, which leads to more than twofold communications range improvement in line-of-sight outdoor scenario and 10–20% improvement in non-line-of-sight indoor scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lamkin, P.: Wearable Tech Market to Be Worth $34 Billion by 2020 (2016). https://www.forbes.com/sites/paullamkin/2016/02/17/wearable-tech-market-to-be-worth-34-billion-by-2020/#4cbe76e83cb5

  2. Tractica: Healthcare Wearable Device Shipments to Reach 98 Million Units Annually by 2021 (2016). https://www.tractica.com/newsroom/press-releases/healthcare-wearable-device-shipments-to-reach-98-million-units-annually-by-2021/

  3. Karvonen, H., Hämäläinen, M., Iinatti, J., Pomalaza-Ráez, C.: Coexistence of wireless technologies in medical scenarios. In: European Conference on Networks and Communications (EUCNC), Oulu, Finland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEEE 802.11 LAN Working Group. http://www.ieee802.org/11/

  5. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks, IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ZigBee Alliance. http://www.zigbee.org/

  7. IEEE Std. 802.15.6: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks. Standard, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hämäläinen, M., et al.: ETSI TC SmartBAN: overview of the wireless body area network standard. In: International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ANT/ANT+. https://www.thisisant.com/

  10. Nokia White Paper: LTE evolution for IoT connectivity (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karvonen, H., Pomalaza-Ráez, C., Mikhaylov, K., Hämäläinen, M., Iinatti, J.: Interference of wireless technologies on BLE based WBANs in hospital scenarios. In: IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Montreal, Canada (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bluetooth SIG: Bluetooth Core Specification v 5.0 (2016). https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/bluetooth-core-specification

  13. Bluetooth SIG: Bluetooth Core Specification 5.0 FAQ (2016). https://www.bluetooth.com/~/media/files/specification/bluetooth-5-faq.ashx?la=en

  14. Nordic nRF52840. https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/nRF52840

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the WILLE project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heikki Karvonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karvonen, H., Pomalaza-Ráez, C., Mikhaylov, K., Hämäläinen, M., Iinatti, J. (2019). Experimental Performance Evaluation of BLE 4 Versus BLE 5 in Indoors and Outdoors Scenarios. In: Fortino, G., Wang, Z. (eds) Advances in Body Area Networks I. Internet of Things. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02819-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02819-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02818-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02819-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics