Skip to main content

Evaluating the Adoption of the Physical Board Game Ludo for Automated Assessments of Cognitive Abilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Serious Games (JCSG 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11243))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Serious games present a valuable tool for continuous cognitive assessments especially in the case of elderly, where there is a lack of cognitive tools to continuously assess the transitory conditions that occur between normal cognition and cognitive failure. However, designing games for elderly poses distinctive challenges since one has to take into account the limited experience of today’s elderly with digital gameplay interfaces like touch screens that are second-nature to younger players. In this paper we present an initial user study with young and healthy subjects where we evaluate a computer-vision based digitalization process that is necessary to turn a physical version of the board game “Ludo” into an automated assessment tool. We further evaluate to which extend this tool presents a valid alternative to assess the strategic cognitive capabilities of a person. We have chosen Ludo in its physical form after careful consideration together with elderly and caregivers since many elderlies know this game from their childhood and thus do not need to learn new game rules or to adapt to digital environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EU: People in the EU – population projections (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Bureau: FFF: Older Americans Month: May 2017 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. EGDF: European Games Developer Federation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aal: Objectives | Active and assisted living programme (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abt, C.C.: Serious games. University Press of America (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games: an overview. Institutionen för kommunikation och information (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P., Rampnoux, O.: Origins of serious games. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 25–43. Springer, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Michael, D.R., Chen, S.L.: Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bente, G., Breuer, J.: Making the implicit explicit. In: Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 322–343 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2013, p. 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shute, V.J.: Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Comput. Games Instr. 55(2), 503–524 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lemus-Zúñiga, L.-G., Navarro-Pardo, E., Moret-Tatay, C., Pocinho, R.: Serious games for elderly continuous monitoring. In: Fernández-Llatas, C., García-Gómez, J.M. (eds.) Data Mining in Clinical Medicine. MMB, vol. 1246, pp. 259–267. Springer, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong, T., et al.: Rapid deployment and evaluation of mobile serious games: a cognitive assessment case study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 69, 96–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wittland, J., Brauner, P., Ziefle, M.: Serious games for cognitive training in ambient assisted living environments – a technology acceptance perspective. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9296, pp. 453–471. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Diethelm, I., Jubeh, R., Koch, A., Zündorf, A.: Whitesocks-a simple GUI framework for Fujaba. Volume Editors, p. 30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kroll, M., Geiß, R.: A Ludo Board Game for the AGTIVE 2007 Tool Contest (2007). http://gtcases.cs.utwente.nl/wiki/uploads/ludokarlsruhe.pdf

  17. Rensink, A., et al.: Ludo: a case study for graph transformation tools. In: Schürr, A., Nagl, M., Zündorf, A. (eds.) AGTIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 5088, pp. 493–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89020-1_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Cujzek, M., Vranic, A.: Computerized tabletop games as a form of a video game training for old-old. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 24(6), 631–648 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. In: Readings in Computer Vision, pp. 184–203. Elsevier (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki, S.: Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 30(1), 32–46 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies, E.: A modified hough scheme for general circle location. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 7(1), 37–43 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Illingworth, J., Kittler, J.: The adaptive hough transform. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 5, 690–698 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Molla, E., Lepetit, V.: Augmented reality for board games. In: ISMAR, pp. 253–254. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int. J. Assistive Robot. Mechatron. 7(3), 33–43 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit. In: RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 528–533 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Ms. Rosel Cleef-Lind from Seniorenzentrum Breberen GmbH (Heinrichs Gruppe), and Ms. Kathrin Polfers, Familienzentrum Lindenbaum e.V., for advice regarding the game and its layout to make the game suitable for elderly and children.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rico Möckel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmitt, F., Christopher, S.M., Tumanov, K., Weiss, G., Möckel, R. (2018). Evaluating the Adoption of the Physical Board Game Ludo for Automated Assessments of Cognitive Abilities. In: Göbel, S., et al. Serious Games. JCSG 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02762-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02762-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02761-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02762-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics