Skip to main content

Introduction: The Nile Development Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Nile Development Game
  • 774 Accesses

Abstract

Although 71% of the earth surface is covered by water, only 0.01% of total water volume on our blue planet is freshwater running in lakes and rivers (Ojakangas 1997: 67). About 60% of this global surface water is shared between two or more countries (UN-Water 2008: 3), creating 276 transboundary lakes and river basins, which host around one-third of the world’s population, cover almost one-half of the world’s land surface, and cross the borders of 148 countries (Giordano et al. 2014: 245, 246). Because freshwater is the source of life and the essential element that fuels vital sectors in the economy of every nation, these figures can justify the growing concerns associated with various scientific fields studying issues related to transboundary river basins, amongst which are the disciplines of international relations (IR), water governance, and spatial planning. In this respect, it is widely argued that large-scale developmental schemes in transboundary watersheds may provoke conflict or promote cooperation amongst different riparian states sharing international watercourses, often affecting basin communities and ecosystems, especially in those regions of water scarcity including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) (Fig. 1.1). At the heart of these debates lies the Nile Basin hydropolitics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As reported in the BBC, it has been recently argued that the Amazon River is the longest after an expedition to Peru discovered in 2006 a new source for the river to reach a total length of 6800 km, while the Nile is 6695 km long (Duffy 2007).

  2. 2.

    As illustrated by Hargreaves Heap et al. (1992) reviewed in Chwaszcza (2008: 145–146), the Prisoner’s Dilemma is the story of two members in a criminal gang whom police arrested. The investigator is sure that both are guilty but has no clear evidence. He gives an offer for each to think about individually in their solitary custody. The offer is as follows: if both do not confess, he will give them a minor punishment; if both confess, he will recommend “less than the most severe sentence” for both; and if one confess and the other does not, the confessor will get the “lenient treatment,” whereas the other get the “book slapped at him.”

References

  • Albanese, R., and D.D. Van Fleet. “Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency.” Academy of Management Review 10, no. 2 (1985): 244–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J.A. “Nile Basin asymmetries: A closed fresh water resource, soil water potential, the political economy and Nile transboundary hydropolitics.” In The Nile: Origin, environments, limnology and human use, edited by H.J. Dumont, 749–770. New York NY, USA: Springer, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, S.C. Water resources. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsano, Y. “Institutional development and water management in the Ethiopian Nile Basin.” In The River Nile in the post-colonial age: Conflict and cooperation among the Nile Basin countries, edited by T. Tvedt, 161–178. New York NY, USA: I.B. Tauris, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abusamhadaneh, K. (2012). Transboundary water management in the Western part of Jordan: Challenges and solutions (M.A. thesis). Braunschweig, Germany: Institute of Social Sciences, TU-Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation. New York, USA: Basic Books Inc. Publishers, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. “On six advances in cooperation theory.” Analyse & Kritik 22, no. 1 (2000): 130–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., and R.O. Keohane. “Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions.” World Politics 38, no. 1 (1985): 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., and C. Elman. “Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods.” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (2006): 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., and A.L. George. Process tracing in case study research – MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods. Cambridge MA, USA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA), Harvard University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, D., and D. Whittington. Opportunities for cooperative water resources development on the Eastern Nile: Risks and rewards – An independent report of the Scoping Study Team for the Eastern Nile Council of Ministers. Edited by planning.unc.edu/people/faculty/dalewhittington/BlackmoreWhittingtonENScopingStudyFinal2009.pdf. The Nile Basin Initiative, 2008.

  • Booth, C. The ancient Egyptians for dummies. Chichester, UK: John Willey & Sons, Ltd., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brochmann, M., and P.R. Hensel. “The effectiveness of negotiations over international river claims.” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 3 (2011): 859–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnee, J., and S.J. Toope. “The changing Nile Basin regime: Does law matter?” Harvard International Law Journal 43, no. 1 (2002): 105–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchill, S., and A. Linklater. “Introduction (Chapter 1).” In Theories of International Relations, edited by S. Burchill, et al., 1–28. New York NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. People, states & fear: An agenda for International Security studies in the Post-Cold War era. Second edition. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press, 1991/2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. “Who owns the Nile? Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia’s history-changing dam.” Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective (Ohio State University) 6, no. 6 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascao, A.E. “Ethiopia–Challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile Basin.” Water Policy 10 (2008): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascao, A.E., and A. Nicol. “GERD: New norms of cooperation in the Nile Basin?” Water International 41, no. 4 (2016): 550–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascao, A.E., and M. Zeitoun. “Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics.” In Transboundary water management: Principles and practice, edited by A. Earle, A. Jaegerskog and J. Oejendal, 27–42. London, UK: Earthscan Ltd., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwaszcza, Christine. “Game Theory (Chapter 8).” In Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective, edited by Donatella della Porta and Michael Keating, 139–161. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D. “Understanding process tracing.” Political Science and Politics 44, no. 4 (2011): 823–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.O. The waters of the Nile: Hydropolitics and the Jonglei Canal, 1900–1988. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. “Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no. 2 (1981): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degefu, G.T. The Nile: Historical, legal and developmental perspectives – A warning for the 21st century. Bloomington: Trafford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli, J., and A.T. Wolf. Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., and G.S. Nigatu. “Distributional considerations of international water resources under externality: The case of Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt on the Blue Nile.” Water Resources and Economics 2–3 (2013): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. “Realism (Chapter 2).” In Theories of International Relations, edited by S. Burchill, et al., 29–54. New York NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, H.J. “A description of the Nile Basin.” In The Nile: Origin, environments, limnology and human use, edited by H.J. Dumont, 1–21. New York NY, USA: Springer, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EAPP & EAC (Eastern Africa Power Pool and East African Community). “Final master plan report: Regional power system master plan and grid code study, Volume I: Generation supply study and planning criteria (WBS 1200).” 2011a. www.eac.int/energy/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=89&Itemid=70 (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • EAPP & EAC (Eastern Africa Power Pool and East African Community). “Final master plan report: Regional power system master plan and grid code study, Volume I: Generation supply study and planning criteria (WBS. “Final master plan report: Regional power system master plan and grid code study, Volume I: Supply-demand analysis and project identification (WBS 1300).” 2011b. www.eac.int/energy/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=89&Itemid=70 (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • EAPP & EAC (Eastern Africa Power Pool and East African Community). “Final master plan report: Regional power system master plan and grid code study, Volume I: Generation supply study and planning criteria (WBS. “Final master plan report: Regional power system master plan and grid code study, Appendix B-II: Summary information on hydro options (WBS 1200).” 2011c. www.eac.int/energy/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=112&Itemid=70 (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • EDF & SW. Strategic environmental and social assessment, M5 and M6, Pre-feasibility studies and regional investment program – Eastern Nile Power Trade Program Study, the Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office, NBI (unpublished report). Electricité de France (EDF) and Scott Wilson of UK (SW), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Atawy, M.H. “Nilopolitics: A hydrological regime, 1870–1990.” Cairo Papers in Social Science, The American University in Cairo Press 19, no. 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhance, A.P. Hydropolitics in the 3rd world: Conflict and cooperation in international river basins. Washington, DC: The United States Institute of Peace, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garstin, W. Report upon the basin of the Upper Nile: With proposals for the improvement of that river. Cairo, Egypt: The Egyptian Ministry of Public Works – National Printing Department, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L., and A. Bennett. Case studies and theory development in the Social Sciences. London, UK: MIT Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, M., A. Drieschova, J.A. Duncan, Y. Sayama, L. De Stefano, and A.T. Wolf. “A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties.” International Environmental Agreements 14 (2014): 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P.H. “Water and conflict: Freshwater resources and international security.” International Security 18, no. 1 (1993): 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., and R.O. Keohane. “Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework.” In Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change, edited by J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane, 3–30. Ithaca NY, USA: Cornell University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves Heap, S., Lyons, B., Hollis, M., Sugden, R., & Weale, A. (1992). The theory of choice: A critical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer, and V. Rittberger. “Integrating theories of international regimes.” Review of International Studies 26, no. 1 (2000): 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K.J. The dividing discipline: Hegemony and diversity in international theory. Boston MA, USA: Allen & Unwin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T.F. Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P.P., M. Lock, and S. Cobb. The Jonglei Canal: Impact and opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A.M. “The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement: The beginning of the end of Egyptian hydro-political hegemony.” Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review 18, no. 2 (2011): 282–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPoE. “International Panel of Experts (IPoE) on Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam Project (GERDP): Final report.” 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyob, B. Resilience and adaptability of transboundary rivers: The principle of equitable distribution of benefits and the institutional capacity of the Nile Basin – A PhD Thesis. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. “Availability of water for agriculture in the Nile Basin.” In The Nile River Basin: Water, agriculture, governance and livelihoods, edited by S.B. Awulachew, V. Smakhtin, D. Molden and D. Peden, 61–83. New York NY, USA: Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, B., J. Enos, C.B. Garlick, G. Simmons, D. Copeland, and M. Cortizo. Limits to population growth and water resource adequacy in the Nile River Basin, 1994–2100. West Point NY, USA: Center for Nation Reconstruction and Capacity Development, United States Military Academy, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, B., K. Epp, M. Houghton, J. Lee, and R. Mayville. Water as a conflict driver: Estimating the effects of climate change and hydroelectric dam diversion on Nile River stream flow during the 21st century. West Point NY, USA: Center for Nation Reconstruction and Capacity Development, United States Military Academy, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. “International institutions: Can interdependence work?” Foreign Policy 110 (1998): 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. “Beyond the tragedy of the commons.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (2010): 577–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O., and L.L. Martin. “The promise of the institutionalist theory.” International Security 20, no. 1 (1995): 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O., and J. Nye. Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1972.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O., and E. Ostrom. Local commons and global interdependence. London, UK: Sage Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D.M., and Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias. “Game Theory and international environmental policy (Chapter 13).” In Models, numbers & cases: Methods for studying international relations, edited by D.F. Sprinz and Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias. University of Michigan Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madani, K., D. Rheinheimer, L. Elimam, and C. Connell-Buck. “A game theory approach to understanding the Nile River Basin conflict.” In A water resource: Festschrift in honor of Prof. Lars Bengtsson, by K.M. Person, 97–114. Lund: Division of Water Resources, Lund University, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. “The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences.” Sociological Methods & Research 20, no. 10 (2012): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.. “Process tracing and historical explanation.” Security Studies 24, no. 2 (2015): 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, S. “The UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses: Prospects and pitfalls.” In International watercourses: Enhancing cooperation and managing conflict – Technical paper no. 414, edited by S.M.A. Salman and L.B. De Chazournes, 17–28. Washington DC, USA: World Bank, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metawie, A.F. “History of co-operation in the Nile Basin.” Water Resources Development 20, no. 1 (2004): 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT. “The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: An opportunity for collaboration and shared benefits in the Eastern Nile Basin – An amicus brief to the riparian nations of Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt from the International, Non-partisan Eastern Nile Working Group.” Abdul Latif Jameel World Water and Food Security Lab, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. November 13–14, 2014. http://jwafs.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/GERD_2014_Full_Report.pdf (accessed December 16, 2016).

  • Moorehead, A. The Blue Nile (reprint). 1962/1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, E. Conflict and cooperation in the management of international freshwater resources: A global review – IHP Technical Documents in Hydrology no. 19. Paris, France: UNESCO International Hydrologic Programme, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBI. “State of the River Nile Basin report.” Nile Basin Initiative. 2012a. http://nileis.nilebasin.org/content/state-river-nile-basin-report (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Ojakangas, R. Earth science. Portland, ME: Walch Publishing, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, S.C. The binding of the Nile and the new Sudan. London, UK: E. Arnold, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaddumi, H. Practical approaches to transboundary water benefit sharing – Working paper no. 292. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit. “Constructivism (Chapter 8).” In Theories of International Relations, edited by S. Burchill, et al., 188–212. New York NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. The logic of historical explanation. University Park PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman, S.M.A. “The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement: A peacefully unfolding African spring?” Water International 38, no. 1 (2013): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman, S.M.A. “The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: The road to the Declaration of Principles and the Khartoum Document.” Water International 41, no. 4 (2016): 512–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambu, K.A. The Misiri legend explored: A linguistic inquiry into the Kalenjiin People’s oral tradition of ancient Egyptian origin. Nairobi, Kenya: University of Nairobi Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeier, S. Governing international watercourses: River Basin Organizations and the sustainable governance of internationally shared rivers and lakes. London, UK: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, F. Linguistic ties between ancient Egyptian and Bantu: Uncovering symbiotic affinities and relationships in vocabulary. Boca Raton FL, USA: Universal Publishers, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snidal, D. “The politics of scope: Endogenous actors, heterogeneity and institutions.” In Local commons and global interdependence, edited by R.O. Keohane and E. Ostrom, 47–70. London, UK: Sage Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, A. “Ethiopia, the Sudan, and Egypt: The Nile River dispute.” Journal of African Studies (Cambridge University Press) 35, no. 4 (1997): 675–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik, R. Revisiting hydro-hegemony from benefit-sharing perspective: The case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam – Discussion paper. Bonn, Germany: Deutschs Institut fuer Entwicklungspolitik, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tignor, R.L. Egypt: A short history. Princeton NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt, T. The River Nile in the age of the British: Political ecology and the quest for economic power. London, UK: I.B. Tauris, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water. “National water development report: Uganda – UN-Water/WWAP/2006/9.” UNESCO. “Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilities (UN thematic paper).” United Nations – Water. 2008. http://www.unwater.org/downloads/UNW_TRANSBOUNDARY.pdf (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • USBR. Land and water resources of the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia – Main report. Washington DC, USA: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1964a.

    Google Scholar 

  • USBR. Land water resources of the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia – Appendix I: Plans and estimates. Washington DC, USA: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1964b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, S. Guide to methods for students of Political Science. London, UK: Cornell University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. “Rational Choice (Chapter 3).” In Theory and methods in political science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 65–89. Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury, J. The Nile Basin: National determinants of collective action. Ann Arbor, MI: Yale University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury, J., and D. Whittington. “Playing chicken on the Nile? The implications of microdam development in the Ethiopian Highlands and Egypt’s New Valley project.” Middle Eastern Natural Environments, 1999: 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCD. Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making. World Commission on Dams, Earthscan, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D. “Visions of Nile Basin development.” Water Policy 6 (2004): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D., X. Wu, and C.W. Sadoff. “Water resources management in the Nile Basin: The economic value of cooperation.” Water Policy 7 (2005): 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns, D., J. Barry, M. Mueller, M. Nakao, L.D. Philo, and A. Zitello. “Co-operation regarding water and other resources will enhance economic development in Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia and Eriterea.” 19, no. 4 (2003): 535–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. International Theory: The three traditions. Edited by G. Wight and B. Porter. Leicester, UK: Holmes & Meier for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A.T.. Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict.” Natural Resources Forum, a United Nations Sustainable Development Journal 23, no. 1 (1999): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffe, S., A.T. Wolf, and M. Giordano. “Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources: Indicators of Basins At Risk.” Edited by http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/abst_docs/Yoffe_Wolf_Giordano.pdf. Journal of the American Water Resources Associations Paper no. 02036 (2003): 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, F.C., and D.M. Kilgour. “Asymmetric deterrence.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1993): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, M., and N. Mirumachi. “Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8, no. 4 (2008): 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, M., and J. Warner. “Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts.” Water Policy 8 (2006): 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samaan, M.M. (2019). Introduction: The Nile Development Game. In: The Nile Development Game. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02665-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics