Abstract
Holding trafficked persons liable can lead to institutional victimisation and is far from the victim-centred approach that is championed in anti-human trafficking discourse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Broad, R., & Turnbull, N. (2018). From Human Trafficking to Modern Slavery: The Development of Anti-slavery Legislation in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, March, 1–15.
De Hert, P. (2012). From the Principle of Accountability to System Responsibility: Key Concepts in Data Protection Law and Human Rights Law Discussions. In D. Guagnin, L. Hempel, L. Ilten, I. Kroener, D. Neyland, & H. Postigo (Eds.), Managing Privacy Through Accountability (pp. 88–120). Basingstoke: Springer.
Mawby, R. I., & Walklate, S. (1994). Critica Victimology. London: Sage.
Pham, J. (2015). Protecting Trafficking Victims from Prosecution: Analysis of the Modern Slavery Bill Defence [Online]. http://files.magdalenecambridge.com/pdfs/Publications/peter_peckard_prize_jp_july_2015.pdf.
Piotrowicz, R. (2009). The Legal Nature of Trafficking in Human Beings. Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, 4, 175–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muraszkiewicz, J.M. (2019). An Alternative Provision. In: Protecting Victims of Human Trafficking From Liability. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02659-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02659-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02658-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02659-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)