Abstract
There is no shortage of victim rights advocates amongst scholars and NGOs defining how best to offer trafficked persons a holistic protection mechanism. Yet legislations, particularly regional ones, balance such recommendations with state sovereignty and diverse legal traditions and practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amnesty International and Anti-slavery. (2005). Council of Europe: Don’t Compromise on the Rights of Trafficked Persons [Online]. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/80000/act840052005en.pdf.
Burchell, J. (2011). South Africa. In K. J. Heller & M. D. Dubber (Eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
Council of Europe. (2005). Explanatory Report on the Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings, ETS 197, 16 May 2005.
Elliott, J. (2015). Victims or Criminals: The Example of Human Trafficking in the United Kingdom. In M. J. Guia (Ed.), The Illegal Business of Human Trafficking. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
European Commission. (2012). Ad-hoc Query on Transposition of Article 8 of Directive 2011/36/EU [Online]. http://emn.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/433_emn_ad-hoc_query_on_transposition_of_article_8_of_directive_2011-36_widerd_en.pdf.
EU Observer. (2016). Child Trafficking in EU on the Rise [Online]. https://euobserver.com/justice/133482.
Gallagher, A. (2009). Human Rights and Human Trafficking: Quagmire or Firm Ground? A response to James Hathaway. Virginia Journal of International Law, 49(4), 789–848.
Hirsch Ballin, M. F. H. (2012). Anticipative Criminal Investigation: Theory and Counterterrorism Practice in the Netherlands and the United States. The Hague: Asser Press.
Hoshi, B. (2013). The Trafficking Defence: A Proposed Model for the Non-criminalisation of Trafficked Persons in International Law. Copyright Groningen Journal of International Law, 1(2), 54–72.
Jehle, J.-M., Wade, M., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., & Fritz Thyssen-Stiftung. (2006). Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Jörg-Martin, J. (2006). The Function of Public Prosecution within the Criminal Justice System Aim, Approach and Outcome of a European Comparative Study. In J. Jörg-Martin & M. Wade. (Eds.), Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems. New York: Springer.
Kyprianou, D. (2010). The Role of the Cyprus Attorney General’s Office in Prosecutions: Rhetoric, Ideology and Practice. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Lasocik, Z. (2013). Niekaralność ofiar handle ludźmi – wstepna diagnoza problem. Warsaw: Warsaw University.
Leiser, B. M. (2008). On Coercion. In D. Reidy & W. Riker (Eds.), Coercion and the State. New York: Springer.
OHCHR. (2010). Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Trafficking. Geneva: OHCHR [Online]. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Traffickingen.pdf.
OSCE Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. (2013). Policy and Legislative Recommendations Towards the Effective Implementation of the Non-punishment Provision with Regard to Victims of Trafficking. Vienna [Online]. http://www.osce.org/secretariat/101002?download=true.
Oxford Dictionaries [Online]. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/compel?q=compELLED.
Oxford Dictionaries [Online]. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/coerce?q=coerced.
Piotrowicz, R. W., & Sorrentino, L. (2016). Human Trafficking and the Emergence of the Non-punishment Principle. Human Rights Law Review, 16(4), 669–699.
Sanders, A. (1996). Introduction. In A. Sanders (Ed.), Prosecution in Common Law Jurisdictions. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Schloenhardt, A., & Markey-Towler, R. (2016). Non-criminalisation of Victims of Trafficking in Persons—Principles, Promises and Perspectives. Groningen Journal of International Law, 4(1), 10–38.
Stoyanova, V. (2015). Human Trafficking and Slavery Reconsidered: Conceptual Limits and States’ Positive Obligations. Lund: Lund University.
Tak, J. P. (Date Unknown). Methods of Diversion Used by the Prosecution Services in the Netherlands and Other Western European Countries [Online] http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No74/No74_07VE_Tak.pdf.
The Law Society. (2015). Criminal Prosecutions of Victims of Trafficking [Online]. http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/advice/practice-notes/criminal-prosecutions-of-victims-of-trafficking/.
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2006). Guidelines on the Protection of Child Victims of Trafficking [Online]. http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/0610-Unicef_Victims_Guidelines_en.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2009). Trafficking in Persons [Online]. http://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/HTleafletA5EnglishupdatedAugust09.pdf.
Van der Rijt, J.-W. (2012). The Importance of Assent. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muraszkiewicz, J.M. (2019). Dissecting Article 26 of the 2005 Council of Europe Convention. In: Protecting Victims of Human Trafficking From Liability. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02659-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02659-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02658-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02659-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)