Advertisement

Comparison of Different Techniques for Power System State Estimation

  • Dženana TomaševićEmail author
  • Samir Avdaković
  • Zijad Bajramović
  • Izet Džananović
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 59)

Abstract

A power system state estimation is one of the most important applications in the power system control center. Power systems are continuously monitored in order to determine a reliable data of the state variables. Conventional power system state estimators, which are iterative and less accurate, are subject to important changes because of the extensive use of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs). Although there are many advantages related to their use, PMUs are highly expensive and cannot be implemented at all buses. Therefore, it is very important to find an optimal number of PMUs and their locations in power system to achieve full observability. This paper presents an overview of different techniques for power system state estimation. It also investigates the outcomes of including PMUs in conventional state estimation process. The effectiveness of the proposed state estimation techniques is validated using IEEE test system with 14 buses.

References

  1. 1.
    Schweppe, F.C., Wildes, J.: Power system static-state estimation, part I: exact model. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. pas-89(1), 120–125 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schweppe, F.C., Rom, D.B.: Power system static-state estimation, part II: approximate model. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. pas-89(1), 125–130 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schweppe, F.C.: Power system static-state estimation, part III: implementation. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. pas-89(1), 130–135 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wood, A.J., Wollenberg, B.F.: Power Generation, Operation, and Control. Wiley, Hoboken (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomez-Exposito, A., Conejo, A.J., Canizares, C.: Electric Energy Systems – Analysis and Operation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De La Ree, J., Centeno, V., Thorp, J.S., Phadke, A.G.: Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1, 20–27 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nuqui, R.F., Phadke, A.G.: Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 20, 2381–2388 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nazari-Heris, M., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.: Application of heuristic algorithms to optimal PMU placement in electric power systems: an updated review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 214–228 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou, M., Centeno, V.A., Thorp, J.S., Phadke, A.G.: An alternative for including phasor measurements in state estimators. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21, 1930–1937 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monticelli, A., Garcia, A.: Reliable bad data processing for real-time state estimation. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. pas-102(5), 1126–1139 (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abur, A., Celik, M.K.: A fast algorithm for the weighted least absolute value state estimation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 6, 1–8 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abur, A., Gomez-Exposito, A.: Power System State Estimation – Theory and Implementation. Marcel Dekker, New York City (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glover, J.D., Sarma, M.S., Overbye, T.J.: Power System Analysis and Design. Cengage Learning, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phadke, A.G., Thorp, J.S.: Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, B., Abur, A.: Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs. In: Power Systems Conference and Exposition (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gou, B.: Optimal placement of PMUs by integer linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23, 1525–1526 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gou, B.: Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23, 1099–1104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Majdoub, M., Sabri, O., Cheddadi, B., Belfqih, A., Boukherouaa, J., El Mariami, F., Cherkaoui, N.: Study of state estimation using weighted least squares method. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 3(8), 55–63 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soni, S., Bhil, S., Mehta, D., Wagh, S.: Linear state estimation model using phasor measurement unit (PMU) technology. In: IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vishnu, T.P., Viswan, V., Vipin, A.M.: Power system state estimation and bad data analysis using weighted least square method. In: IEEE International Conference on Power, Instrumentation, Control and Computing (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dženana Tomašević
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samir Avdaković
    • 1
  • Zijad Bajramović
    • 1
  • Izet Džananović
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.PE Elektroprivreda B&HSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations