Monitoring of Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Fields in the Urban Zone of Tuzla City
During the recent years the problem about the monitoring of electromagnetic field pollution attracts the increasing attention of both scientists and national authorities. The topic of the problem lies in the increasing interest towards the local, regional, and global aspect study and control of the electromagnetic pollution. The need of receiving regular and accurate information about the changes in environmental electromagnetic radiation appeared.
This paper analyzed the cause of natural and man-made electromagnetic environment pollution, pointed out the harm of public health and the city normal production and living order and the city sustainable development. This paper suggested that comprehensive treatment measures should be taken to solve the problem of electromagnetic environment pollution in cities including the reasonable planning and layout, the real powerful supervision, the advertisement and education, and the high level of protection technology.
This paper has been written to show analysis of results measured in the urban zone. The measurement is realised by instruments ESM-100 and PCE – EM 29. For this reason, in this study electromagnetic radiation (EMR) measurements were conducted on four different days in Tuzla.
Measured EM field levels are compared with the limits that are determined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and World Health Organization WHO.
KeywordsElectric field strength Magnetic field strength Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) Electromagnetic field (EM) measurement
- 4.ICNIRP Guidelines. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time - varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 74(4), 494–522 (1998). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation ProtectionGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lee, J.M., Pierce, K.S., Spiering, C.A., Steams, R.D., Van Ginhoven, G.: Electrical and Biological Effects of Transmission Lines: A Review. Boneville Power Administration, Portland (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Havas, M.: Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy: a critical review of the reports by the us national research council and the US national institute of environmental health sciences as they relate to the broad realm of EMF Bioeffects. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. Rev. 8(2000), 173–253 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.Demirci, H.: Calculation and effect of electromagnetic fields with the human body. Marmara Master Science Thesis, University Physical Sciences Institute, Istanbul (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Havas, M.: Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the hearth and the autonomic nervous system. Rev. Environ. Health 28(2–3), 75–84 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Carpenter, D.O., Sage, C. (eds.).: BioInitiativereport: a rationale for biologically-based public exposure standards for electromagnetics fields (ELF and RF) (2012). www.bioinitiative.org. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
- 12.Blank, M., Havas, M., Kelley, E., Lai, H., Moskowitz, J.: International apeal: scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure. Eur. J. Oncol. 20(3/4) 180–182 (2015). www.emfscientist.org. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
- 13.Yougang, G., Lifang, Y.: Determination of dangerous region of the electromagnetic pollution caused by the electric fields around power line. In: International Conference on Communication Technology, ICCT 1998, 22–24 October Beijing, China (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Pravilo 37/2008 o ograničavanju emisija EM zračenja. Regulatorna agencija za komunikacije BiHGoogle Scholar