Abstract
The role of the legal representative in patent filing processes is, so far, under-explored in patent statistics. This chapter addresses the question of the role and the impact of the patent attorney in the filing process. One of the core assumptions is that more experienced attorneys have more in-depth knowledge of the intricacies of the patent system and, thus, are more likely to pursue more elaborate and successful filing strategies.
The results show a high concentration of attorneys and filing action in absolute as well as in relative terms in some countries, namely Germany and the UK, and numbers worth mentioning also in other larger applicant countries like France, Italy, Sweden, or the Netherlands. Explanations for this biased distribution in Europe are language advantages in the case of the UK (and also Ireland) and geographical proximity to the European Patent Office (EPO), as well as economies of scale in the case of Germany.
The experience of the representative has a considerable impact on the outcome. Multivariate analyses suggest that the (financial) resource endowment is a decisive factor in the hiring of patent attorneys. It was shown that the patents of more experienced representatives were significantly more often withdrawn (but neither refused nor granted with a higher probability), and they were less often opposed than the ones by less experienced attorneys.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
K. Blind, J. Edler, R. Frietsch, U. Schmoch: Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany, Res. Policy 35(5), 655–672 (2006)
European Patent Office (EPO): The European Patent Convention, Article 134, http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2013/e/ar134.html (2018)
European Patent Office: How to get a European patent, guide for applicants, http://www.epo.org/applying/european/guide-for-applicants.html (2017)
J. Danguy, B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie: Patent fees for a sustainable EU patent system, World Pat. Inf. 33(3), 240–247 (2011)
G. de Rassenfosse, B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie: Per un pugno di dollari: A first look at the price elasticity of patents, Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 23(4), 588–604 (2007)
P. Hanik: Patent design using FAST, Value World 32(3), 30–40 (2009)
W.M.H.B.U. Hussain, M.N.A. Rahman, N.I. Yaakub, Z.A. Zainul, W.K. Mujani: Online legal marketing: How lawyers assist in commercialization of university research. In: Int. Conf. Educ. Manag. Technol., ICEMT 2010 (2010)
B.P. Nagori, V. Mathur: Basics of writing patent non-infringement and freedom-to-operate opinions, J. Intellect. Prop. Rights 14(1), 7–13 (2009)
M. Reitzig: Improving patent valuations for management purposes—Validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales, Res. Policy 33(6/7), 939–957 (2004)
D. Somaya, I.O. Williamson, N. Lorinkova: Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators versus competitors, Acad. Manag. J. 51(5), 936–953 (2008)
S. Macdonald, B. Lefang: Innovation and the patent attorney, Prometheus 15(3), 329–343 (1997)
C. Li, T. Lan, S.J. Liu: Patent attorney as technology intermediary: A patent attorney-facilitated model of technology transfer in developing countries, World Pat. Inf. 43, 62–73 (2015)
G. Buenstorf, M. Geissler: Not invented here: Technology licensing, knowledge transfer and innovation based on public research, J. Evol. Econ. 22(3), 481–511 (2012)
K. Hussinger, A. Wastyn: In search for the not-invented-here syndrome: The role of knowledge sources and firm success, R&D Management 46, 945–957 (2016)
R. Katz, T.J. Allen: Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups, R&D Management 12(1), 7–20 (1982)
K.S. Gaudry: The lone inventor: Low success rates and common errors associated with pro-se patent applications, PLoS One 7(3), e33141 (2012)
C. Koller, B. Ebersberger: How do characteristics of patent attorneys influence patent quality? In: DRUID15, Rome (2015)
R. Frietsch, P. Neuhäusler, O. Rothengatter: Which road to take? Filing routes to the European patent office, World Pat. Inf. 35(1), 8–19 (2013)
A. Gambardella, D. Harhoff, B. Verspagen: The value of European patents, Eur. Manag. Rev. 5(2), 69–84 (2008)
K.A. Moore: Populism and patents, N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 82(1), 69–111 (2007)
M. Reitzig, S. Wagner: Patently (un) clear, Bus. Strategy Rev. 21(1), 28–33 (2010)
D.S. Abrams, A.H. Yoon: The luck of the draw: Using random case assignment to investigate attorney ability, Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 74(4), 1145–1177 (2007)
J. Szmer, S.W. Johnson, T.A. Sarver: Does the lawyer matter? Influencing outcomes on the supreme Court of Canada, Law Soc. Rev. 41(2), 279–304 (2007)
G. de Rassenfosse, H. Dernis, G. Boedt: An introduction to the PATSTAT database with example queries, Aust. Econ. Rev. 47, 395–408 (2014)
European Patent Office (EPO): PATSTAT—Backbone data set for statistical analyses, https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/business/patstat.html#tab-1 (2018)
R. Frietsch, P. Neuhäusler, O. Rothengatter: SME Patenting—An Empirical Analysis in Nine Countries, Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, Vol. 36 (Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe 2013)
M. Du Plessis, B. Van Looy, X. Song, T. Magerman: Data Production Methods for Harmonized Patent Indicators: Assignee Sector Allocation, EUROSTAT Working Paper and Studies (EUROSTAT, Luxembourg 2009)
T. Magerman, J. Grouwels, X. Song, B. Van Looy: Data Production Methods for Harmonized Patent Indicators: Patentee Name Harmonization, EUROSTAT Working Paper and Studies (EUROSTAT, Luxembourg 2009)
B. Peeters, X. Song, J. Callaert, J. Grouwels, B. Van Looy: Harmonizing Harmonized Patentee Names: An Exploratory Assessment of top Patentees, EUROSTAT Working Paper and Studies (EUROSTAT, Luxembourg 2009)
U. Schmoch: Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons. Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe 2008)
S. Daimer, M. Hufnagl, R. Frietsch, R. Lindner, P. Neuhäusler, O. Rothengatter: Die Leistungsfähigkeit des deutschen Innovationssystems – Eine Bilanz der Patentaktivitäten nach zehn Jahren Hightech-Strategie, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, Vol. 57 (Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe 2018)
P. Neuhäusler, O. Rothengatter, R. Frietsch: Patent applications—Structures, trends and recent developments 2017. In: Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystemm Berlin 2015, Vol. 4, ed. by Expertenkommission Forschung Innovation (EFI, Berlin 2018)
P. Neuhäusler, O. Rothengatter, R. Frietsch: Patent applications—Structures, trends and recent developments 2016. In: Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, Vol. 4, ed. by Expertenkommission Forschung Innovation (EFI, Berlin 2017)
G.S. Becker: The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990)
G.S. Becker, B.R. Chiswick: Education and the distribution of earnings, Am. Econ. Rev. 56(1/2), 358–369 (1966)
J. Mincer: Investment in human capital and personal income distribution, J. Polit. Econ. 66, 281–302 (1958)
J. Mincer: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, Human Behavior and Social Institutions, National Bureau of Economic Research (Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1974)
J. Mincer: Human capital and earnings. In: Wealth, Income, and Inequality, ed. by A.B. Atkinson (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1980) pp. 103–128
T.W. Schultz: Investment in human capital, Am. Econ. Rev. 51(1), 1–17 (1961)
T.W. Schultz: On investing in specialized human capital to attain increasing returns. In: The State of Development Economics. Progress and Perspectives, ed. by G. Ranis, T.P. Schultz (Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1988) pp. 339–352
J. Heckman, L. Lochner, P. Todd: Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions, NBER Working Paper Series, Vol. 9732 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge 2003)
J.J. Heckmann: The Economics, Technology and Neuroscience of Human Capability Formation, NBER Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge 2007)
Acknowledgements
Parts of this work was funded by the European Commission under the contract number: MARKT/2014/222/B2/SE/LV
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P. (2019). The Role of the Patent Attorney in the Filing Process. In: Glänzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch, U., Thelwall, M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02510-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02511-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)