Skip to main content

Can Certification Enhance the Feasibility of Insurance?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Certification – Trust, Accountability, Liability

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 16))

Abstract

The feasibility of insurance heavily depends on the behaviour of the insured. Certification can be a tool to facilitate risk classification and monitoring. This chapter aims to analyse the role of certification for insurance of risks in agriculture. We develop three cases: (1) liability insurance in the animal feed industry, (2) epidemic disease insurance for farmers, and (3) liability insurance in the horse business. Findings illustrate that certification schemes have potential to enhance feasibility of insurance schemes, among others as a tool to cope with adverse selection. It is recommended to further exploit opportunities of certification as part of insurance design to also address problems of moral hazard and systemic risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Meuwissen et al. (2009), p. 878.

  2. 2.

    See Breukers et al. (2008), p. 137; Meuwissen et al. (2003), p. 305; Meuwissen et al. (2013), p. 10.

  3. 3.

    See Rejda (1998).

  4. 4.

    See Meuwissen et al. (2001), p. 343.

  5. 5.

    See, e.g., Valeeva et al. (2006), p. 511, for feed safety risks in dairy chains; Tufa et al. (2010), p. 537, regarding yield risks of potato production.

  6. 6.

    Trienekens et al. (2012), p. 55.

  7. 7.

    Harrington and Niehaus (1999).

  8. 8.

    See Rejda (1998).

  9. 9.

    See Harrington and Niehaus (1999).

  10. 10.

    See Meuwissen et al. (2003).

  11. 11.

    See Rejda (1998).

  12. 12.

    See van Asseldonk et al. (2011), p. 169.

  13. 13.

    Rao (2013).

  14. 14.

    Valeeva et al. (2006), Meuwissen et al. (2009) and van Asseldonk et al. (2011).

  15. 15.

    See Breukers et al. (2008) and Meuwissen et al. (2003).

  16. 16.

    See Meuwissen et al. (2013).

  17. 17.

    Hitchens et al. (2010), p. 693.

  18. 18.

    Pashaei Kamali et al. (2014), p. 949.

References

  • Breukers, A., Mourits, M. C. M., van der Werf, W., & Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2008). Costs and benefits of controlling quarantine diseases: A bio-economic modeling approach. Agricultural Economics, 38, 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. E., & Niehaus, G. R. (1999). Risk management and insurance. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, P. L., Blizzard, C. L., Jones, G., Day, L., & Fell, J. (2010). Predictors of race-day jockey falls in flat racing in Australia. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67, 693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, M. P. M., Assefa, T., & van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M. (2013). Supporting insurance in European agriculture; Experience of mutuals in the Netherlands. EuroChoices, 12(3), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, M. P. M., Hardaker, J. B., Huirne, R. B. M., & Dijkhuizen, A. A. (2001). Sharing risks in agriculture: Principles and empirical results. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Science, 49, 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, M. P. M., van Andel, A. A., van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2009). Eliciting processing industry damage from feed crises. British Food Journal, 111(8), 878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, M. P. M., van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2003). Alternative risk financing instruments for swine epidemics. Agricultural Systems, 75(2–3), 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashaei Kamali, F., Meuwissen, M. P. M., De Boer, I. J. M., Stolz, H., Jahrl, I., Garibay, S. V., et al. (2014). Identifying sustainability issues for soymeal and beef production chains. Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 27(6), 949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R. (2013). Applied conjoint analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejda, G. E. (1998). Principles of risk management and insurance. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trienekens, J. H., Wognum, P. M., Beulens, A. J. M., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2012). Transparency in complex dynamic food supply chains. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufa, A., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Tesfaye, A., Lommen, W. J. M., Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M., Tsegaye, A., et al. (2010). Analysis of seed potato systems in Ethiopia. American Journal of Potato Research, 87, 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeeva, N. I., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2006). Cost implications of improving food safety in the Dutch dairy chain. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(4), 511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2011). A risk analysis of compound feed contamination. In S. R. Borgearo (Ed.), Animal feed: Types, nutrition and safety (p. 169). New York: Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda P. M. Meuwissen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meuwissen, M.P.M. (2019). Can Certification Enhance the Feasibility of Insurance?. In: Rott, P. (eds) Certification – Trust, Accountability, Liability. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02499-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02499-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02498-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02499-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics