Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Causality and Development
  • 422 Accesses

Abstract

The first chapter in the book outlines the relevance of this third book in a series of three books on the topic of causality and development (see Young, Development and causality: Neo-Piagetian perspectives. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2011; Unifying causality and psychology: being, brain and behavior. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016). The first part of the book deals with the causality of handedness /hemispheric specialization development , and it includes the role in this regard of the author’s developmental model and causal thinking . It emphasizes the centrality of activation – inhibition coordination in helping to describe both behavior and brain function . The second part of the book elaborates the Neo-Eriksonian portion of the author’s Neo-Piagetian/Neo-Eriksonian 25-step developmental model . It shows how the model can inform not only development but also therapeutic practice. The chapter emphasizes the needed integration of causality as a unifying theme in psychology and that causality and development are not dissociable. The first part of the book on handedness/hemispheric specialization provides an extensive literature review and, in this sense, is empirically driven. Also, the Neo-Piagetian model is based on Piaget’s rich observations of his children in the first year of life and also on other data that were used to support the competing models of Case and Fischer, in particular, and that apply as well to the present model. The Neo-Eriksonian portion of the book begins with the presentation of the concept of neo-stage , which permits empirical investigation of networking on sub-stage components and their advancement into more advanced sub-stages. However, the Neo-Eriksonian portion of the present model will require clinical application and insight before more rigorous empirical investigation can be undertaken. Nevertheless, the extent to which it greatly elaborates the Eriksonian lifespan developmental model of eight stages (not to mention Freud’s precursor model of five stages) into a 25-step model warrants its investigation and also supports its potential utility and validity .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bjorklund, D. F. (2018). A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is dead” revisited). Child Development, 89, 2288–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C., & DiClemente, C. C. (1994). Changing for good: The revolutionary program that explains the six stages of change and teaches you how to free yourself from bad habits. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (1990a). The development of hemispheric and manual specialization. In G. Hammond (Ed.), The cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 79–139). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (1990b). Early neuropsychological development: Lateralization of functions – Hemispheric specialization. In C. A. Hauert (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Cognitive, perceptuo-motor and neuropsychological perspectives (pp. 113–181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2011). Development and causality: Neo-Piagetian perspectives. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2012). A unitary Neo-Piagetian/ Neo-Eriksonian model of development: Fundamental assumptions and meta-issues. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2014). Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury – Implications for practice and court. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2016). Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2017). Revising the APA ethics code. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Segalowitz, S. J., Corter, C. M., & Trehub, S. E. (Eds.). (1983). Manual specialization and the developing brain. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Young, G. (2019). Introduction. In: Causality and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02493-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics