Skip to main content

Preventing Incisional Hernias: Closure of Abdominal Wall, Follow-Up in Abdominal Surgery

  • Chapter
Book cover Abdominal Wall Surgery

Abstract

Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal wall surgery, including laparotomy, stoma creation, and laparoscopic approach, that causes a negative impact on the patient’s quality of life and body image and may be responsible for potential serious complications. Its repair, moreover, is at high risk of recurrence thus leading to a vicious circle, each subsequent repair being at higher risk of relapse. Direct and indirect costs for these patients are very high with overall financial losses, particularly when the cost of readmissions is added. The magnitude of costs related to incisional hernia strongly suggests the need of effective prevention solutions. Patients’ reported outcome and adequate follow-up have to be better assessed, possibly by large controlled multicenter randomized trials to assess the best cost-effective indications. The European Hernia Society Guidelines Development Group already moved in this direction by publishing, in 2015, evidence-based guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions and, in 2018, those on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia. Different levels of recommendation are made with regard to the main topics, based on the evaluation of available high-quality studies and meta-analysis. Works are still in progress, as there are still many unsolved questions needing more careful observations and longer, comparable follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bosanquet D, Aboelrahman T, Ansell J, Cornish J, Davies L, Frewer K, Glasbey J, Harries R, Stimpson A, Russell D, Russell I, Torkington J. Systematic review and meta regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: an analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniu GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniu SA, Granderath FA, Giannoukas AD, Lazarides MK. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and abdominal wall hernias manifestations of connective tissue disorder. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Heker HH, REJGM P, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Tmman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ, for the PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:567–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murray BW, Cipher DJ, Pham T, Anthony T. The impact of surgical site infection on the development of incisional hernia and small bowel obstruction in colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2011;202:558–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Claes K, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D, Muysoms F. Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan. Hernia. 2014;18:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1214-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2012;204:144–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS. Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:159–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1999-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lanni MA, Tecce MG, Shubinets V, Mirzabeigi MN, Fischer JP. The state of prophylactic mesh augmentation. Am Surg. 2018;54:99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK. Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodenough CJ, Tien CK, Kao LS, Nguyen MT, Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Nguyen DH, Ramon Gonzalez J, Arita NT, Roth JS, Liang MK. Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:405–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Muysoms FE, Antoniu SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Janes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of the abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bickenbach KA, Karanicolas PJ, Ammori JB, Jayaraman S, Winter JM, Fields RC, Govindarajamn A, Nir I, Rocha FG, Brennan MF. Up and down or side to side? A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of incision on outcomes after abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2013;206:400–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Henning M, South LM, Andrews SM. Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1208–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J. Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:260–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Proske JM, Zieren J, Muller JM. Transverse versus midline incision for upper abdominal surgery. Surg Today. 2005;35:117–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search of an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Henriksen NA, Deerenberg EB, Venclauskas L, Fortelny RH, Miserez M, Muysoms FE. Meta-analysis on material and techniques for laparotomy closure: the MATCH review. World J Surg. 2018;42:1666–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4393-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:1528–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Henriksen NA, Deeremberg EB, Venclauskas L, Fortelny RH, Garcia-Alamino JM, Miserez M, Muysoms FE. Triclosan-coated sutures and surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: the TRISTAN review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2017;21:833–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1681-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the inline systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251:843–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Baig MK, McFall MR. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy. Int J Surg. 2011;9:615–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1350–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn EC, Heisterkamp J, Wijnhoven BPL, Schouten WR, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Berends FJ, Dijkhuizen PH, Dwarkasing RS, Jairam AP, van Ramshorst GH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1254–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harries RL, Cornish J, Bosanquet D, Rees B, Horwood J, Islam S, Bashir N, Watkins A, Russell IT, Torkington J, on behalf of the HART Trial Management Group. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) – abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BJM Open. 2017;7:e017235. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cornish J, Harries RL, Bosanquet D, Reees B, Ansell J, Frewer N, Dhruva Rao PK, Parry C, Ellis-Owen R, Philips SM, Morris C, Horwood J, Davies ML, Davies MM, Hargest R, Davies Z, Hilton J, Harris D, Ben-Sassi A, Rajagopal R, Hanratty D, Islam S, Watkins A, Bashir N, Jones S, Russell IR, Torkington J, HART Trial Management Group. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) – Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:454. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1537-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Petro CC, Rosen MJ. Repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias. Hamilton: Scientific American Surgery, Decker Intellectual Properties; 2014. p. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Playforth MJ, Sauven PD, Evans M, Pollock AV. The prediction of incisional hernias by radio-opaque markers. Ann R Coll Surg. 1986;68:82–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellon JM, Lopez-Hervas P, Rodriguez M, Grarcia-Honduvilla N, Pascual G, Bujan J. Midline abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:490–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borab ZM, Shakir S, Lanni MA, Tecce MG, MacDonald J, Hope WW, Fischer JP. Does Prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2017;161:1149–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Caro-Tarrago A, Olona Casas C, Jimenez Salido A, Duque Guilera E, Moreno Fernandez F, Vicente Guillen V. Prevention of incisional hernia in midline laparotomy with an onlay mesh: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2014;38:2223–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2510-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garcia-Urena MA, Lopez-Monclus J, Blazquez Hernando LA, Melero Montes D, Valle de Lersundi AR, Castellon Pavon C, Jimenez Ceinos C, Lopez Quindos C. Randomized controlled trial of the use of a large-pore polypropylene mesh to prevent incisional hernia in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261:876–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Blazquez Hernando LA, Garcia-Urena MA, Lopez-Monclus J, Garcia Hernandez S, Valle de Lersundi AR, Cruz Cidoncha A, Melero Montes D, Castellon Pavon C, Gonzalez Gonzalez E, Palencia Garcia N. Prophylactic mesh can be used safely in the prevention of incisional hernia after bilateral subcostal laparotomies. Surgery. 2016;160:1358–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Argudo N, Pereira JA, Sancho JJ, Membrilla E, Pons MJ, Grande L. Prophylactic synthetic mesh can be safely used to close emergency laparotomies, even in peritonitis. Surgery. 2014;156:1238–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Muysoms FE, Dietz UA. Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall. Chirurg. 2017;88(Suppl 1):S34–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0229-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Muysoms FE, Detry O, Vierendeels T, Huyghe M, Miserez M, Ruppert M, Tollens T, Defraigne JO, Berrevoet F. Prevention of incisional hernias by prophylactic mesh-augmented reinforcement of midline laparotomies for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263:638–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Llaguna OH, Avgerinos DV, Nagda P, Elfant D, Leitman IM, Goodman E. Does prophylactic biologic mesh placement protect against the development of incisional hernia in high risk patients? World J Surg. 2011;35:1651–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1131-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarr MG, Hutcher NE, Snyder S, Hodde J, Carmody B. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of Surgisis Gold, a biologic prosthetic, as a sublay reinforcement of the fascial closure after open bariatric surgery. Surgery. 2014;156:902–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopez-Cano M, Armengol M, Quiles MT, Biel A, Velasco J, Huguet P, Mestre A, Delgado LM, Gil FX, Arbos MA. Preventive midline laparotomy closure with a new bioabsorbable mesh: an experimental study. J Surg Res. 2013;181:160–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hijort H, Mathisen T, Alves A, Clermont G, Boutrand JP. Three-years results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics. Hernia. 2012;16:191–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0885-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Schumpelick V. Foreign body reactions to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:665–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Muysoms FE, Jairam A, Lopez-Cano M, Smietanski M, Woeste G, Kyle-Leinhase I, Antoniu SA, Lockerling F, BioMesh Study Group. Prevention of incisional hernias with biological mesh: review of the literature. Front Surg. 2016;3:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lopez-Cano M, Pereira JA, Lozoya R, Feliu X, Villalobos R, Navarro S, Arbos MA, Armengol-Carrasco M. PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;39:335–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2014.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Soderback H, Mahteme H, Hellman P, Sandblom G. Prophylactic resorbable synthetic mesh to prevent dehiscence and incisional hernia in high high-risk laparotomy: a pilot study of using TIGR Matrix mesh. Front Surg. 2016;3:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00028.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN, Knebel P, Bruckner T, Ulrich A, Werner J, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Incisional rates 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:51–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pearl RK. Parastomal hernias. World J Surg. 1989;13:569–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Israelsson LA. Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg. 2005;29:1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, Bombardo-Junca J, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Rebasa P, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinic-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:173–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003;90:784–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR. Life-table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:334–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gillern S, Bleier J. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Antoniu SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Dietz UA, Fortelny RH, Frei-Lanter C, Hansson B, Helgstrand F, Hotouras A, Janes A, Kroese LF, Lambrecht JR, Kyle-Leinhase I, Lopez-Cano M, Maggiori L, Mandalà V, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Prudhomme M, Rautio T, Smart N, Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Stabilini C, Muysoms FE. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia. Hernia. 2018;22:183–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sohn YJ, Moon SM, Shin US, Jee SE. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia. J Korean Sco Coloproctol. 2012;28:241–6. https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nasvall P, Wikner F, Gunnarsson U, Rutegard J, Strigard K. A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:1263–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1944-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, Monson JRT. Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions. Dig Surg. 2014;31:366–76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehelet H, Jorgensen LN, Wara P, Bisgaard T. Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1265–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a0e6e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2004;91:280–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, van Lammeren FM, Mahabier C, Steenvoorde P, de Vries Reilingh TS, Wiezer RJ, de Wilt JH, Bleichrodt RP, Rosman C. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial. Hernia. 2016;20:535–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1427-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chapman SJ, Wood B, Drake TM, Young N, Jaune DG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cornille JB, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, Wexner SD, Bauer J, George V, PRISM Study Group. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled studi of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:623–31. https://doi.org/10.1079/DCR.0000000000000106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, May C, Kockerling F, BioMesh Study Group. Prevention of parastomal hernia by biological mesh reinforcement. Front Surg. 2015;2:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, Vaktskjold A, Julsrud L, Flatmark K. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:191–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lopez-Cano M, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Hansson B, Kyle-Leinhase I, Alamino JG, Muysoms F. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end-colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2017;21:177–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1563-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lopez-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, Sanchez-Garcia JL, Jimenez-Gomez LM, Marti M, Vallribera F, Fraccalvieri D, Serracant A, Kreisler E, Biondo S, Espin E, Navarro-Soto S, Armengol-Carrasco M. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified Sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264:923–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Odensten C, Strigard K, Rutegard J, Dahlberg M, Stahle U, Gunnarsson U, Nasvall P. Use a prophylactic mesh when creating a colostomy does not prevent parastomal hernia: a randomized controlled trial- STOMAMESH. Ann Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002542.

  67. Planka F, Probst P, Keller AV, Saure D, Grummich K, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: the PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of a use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg. 2009;249:583–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Vierimaa M, Klintruo K, Biancari F, Victorzon M, Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Kossi J, Kellokumpu I, Rauvala E, Ohtonen P, Makela J, Rautio T. Prospective, randomized study on the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia of permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:943–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang S, Wang W, Zhu B, Song G, Jiang G. Efficacy of prophylactic mesh in end-colostomy construction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40:2528–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3576-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Gris P, Jimeno J, Orbeal R, Vallverdú H, López Negre JL, Urgellés J, Estalella L, Parés D. Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. Am J Surg. 2014;207:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Armañanzas L, Ruiz-Tovar J, Arroyo A, García-Peche P, Armañanzas E, Diez M, Galindo I, Calpena R. Prophylactic mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia. A randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:960–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS. Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1999-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gillion JF, Sanders D, Miserez M, Muysoms F. The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis. Hernia. 2016;20:819–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1480-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fischer JP, Basta MN, Wink JD, Krishnan MN, Kovach SJ. Cost-utility analysis of the use of prophylactic mesh augmentation compared with primary fascial suture repair in patients at high risk for incisional hernia. Surgery. 2015;158:700–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda D’Amore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stabilini, C., D’Amore, L., Annesi, E., Bambi, L., Negro, P., Gossetti, F. (2019). Preventing Incisional Hernias: Closure of Abdominal Wall, Follow-Up in Abdominal Surgery. In: Greco, D.P., Borgonovi, E. (eds) Abdominal Wall Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02426-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02426-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02425-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02426-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics