Skip to main content

Inflow Performance Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Whenever a well is drilled and completed, it is expected to flow naturally via the wellbore to the surface, a relationship known as inflow and outflow. The inflow performance relationship (IPR) is often required for estimating well capacity, designing well completion, designing tubing string, optimizing well production, performing nodal analysis calculations, and designing artificial lift etc. This performance is commonly defined in terms of a plot of surface production rate versus bottomhole flowing pressure on a cartesian coordinate. The maximum flow rate that occurs when the bottomhole flowing pressure is zero and the maximum rate corresponding to this pressure is called the absolute open flow (AOF). In this chapter, several mathematical models for estimating the inflow performance relationship (IPR) are presented with solved example questions. Also, a case study of an improvement in IPR curve of well K35 to evaluate the efficacy of a pre and post stimulation job is also presented. Result indicates that; it is very important to determine the type of skin on each well. This help in knowing the type of solution to the problem of a well in order to increase its productivity. Thus, a well whose skin is due to completion, partial penetration or slanting of well does not require stimulation and if the field’s operators go ahead to stimulate, they will only end up wasting time and money without achieving any result because these types of skin cannot be removed by stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Hussainy R, Ramey HJ Jr, Crawford PB (1966) The flow of real gases through porous media. J Pet Technol 18(5):624–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendakhlia H, Aziz K (1989) IPR for solution-gas drive horizontal wells. Paper presented at the 64th annual meeting in San Antonio, Texas, 8–11 Oct 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AM (1990) IPR for Solution Gas-Drive Horizontal Wells. SPE Paper 20720, presented at the 65th Annual SPE meeting held in New Orleans, September 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft BC, Hawkins MF, Terry RE (1991) Applied petroleum reservoir engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake LP (1978) Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetkovich MJ (1973) The isochronal testing of oil wells. Paper presented at the SPE 48th annual meeting, Las Vegas, 30 Sept–3 Oct 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger FM, Reiss LH, Jourdan AP (1984) The reservoir engineering aspect of horizontal drilling. Paper presented at the SPE 59th annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, Texas, 16–19 Sept 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan M, Whitson CH (1986) Well performance, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Ghalambor A (2005) Natural gas engineering handbook. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Klins MA, Majher MW (1992) Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged or Improved Wells Producing Under Solution-Gas Drive. SPE Paper 19852. JPT, 1357–1363 Dec 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klins M, Clark L (1993) An improved method to predict future IPR curves. SPE Res Eng 8:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea JF, Nickens HV, Mike R (2008) Gas well deliquification wells, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WJ, Wattenbarger RA (1996) Gas reservoir engineering. In: SPE textbook series. Richardson, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons WC, Plisga GJ (eds) (2005) Standard handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskat M, Evinger HH (1942) Calculations of theoretical productivity factor. Trans AIME 146:126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing MB (1970) Inflow performance relationships for damaged wells producing by solution-gas drive. JPT 1970:1399–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarek A (2010) Reservoir engineering handbook, 3rd edn. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JV (1968) Inflow performance relationships for solution-gas drive wells. Trans AIME 243:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins ML (1993) Generalized inflow performance relationships for three phase flow. Paper presented at the SPE production operations symposium, Oklahoma City, 21–23 Mar 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercises

Exercises

Ex 9.1 :

An oil well is flowing at a rate of 420 STB/day under steady state conditions. The wellbore flowing pressure is 2750 psia. The reservoir thickness is 28 f. and permeability of 62 mD. The wellbore and reservoir radii are 0.325 f. and 700 f. respectively. A result from well test conducted on the well shows that it was damaged with skin of 2.87. PVT report gave the oil FVF as 1.356 bbl/STB and oil viscosity of 2.108 cp. Calculate:

  • The reservoir pressure

  • The absolute open flow potential

  • The productivity index

Ex 9.2 :

The following reservoir and flow-test data are available on an oil well:

Average reservoir pressure

3560 psia

Bubble point pressure

2600 psia

Flow bottom hole pressure from flow test

2930 psia

Flow rate from flow test

300 STB/day

Generate the IPR data of the well.

Ex 9.3 :

An oil well is producing from an undersaturated reservoir that is characterized by a bubble-point pressure of 2500 psig. The current average reservoir pressure is 3750 psig. Available flow test data show that the well produced 379 STB/day at a stabilized Pwf of 3050 psig. Construct the current IPR data by using:

  • Vogel’s correlation

  • Wiggins’ method

  • Klins and Majcher method

  • Standing method

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Okotie, S., Ikporo, B. (2019). Inflow Performance Relationship. In: Reservoir Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02393-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02393-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02392-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02393-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics