Abstract
Whenever a well is drilled and completed, it is expected to flow naturally via the wellbore to the surface, a relationship known as inflow and outflow. The inflow performance relationship (IPR) is often required for estimating well capacity, designing well completion, designing tubing string, optimizing well production, performing nodal analysis calculations, and designing artificial lift etc. This performance is commonly defined in terms of a plot of surface production rate versus bottomhole flowing pressure on a cartesian coordinate. The maximum flow rate that occurs when the bottomhole flowing pressure is zero and the maximum rate corresponding to this pressure is called the absolute open flow (AOF). In this chapter, several mathematical models for estimating the inflow performance relationship (IPR) are presented with solved example questions. Also, a case study of an improvement in IPR curve of well K35 to evaluate the efficacy of a pre and post stimulation job is also presented. Result indicates that; it is very important to determine the type of skin on each well. This help in knowing the type of solution to the problem of a well in order to increase its productivity. Thus, a well whose skin is due to completion, partial penetration or slanting of well does not require stimulation and if the field’s operators go ahead to stimulate, they will only end up wasting time and money without achieving any result because these types of skin cannot be removed by stimulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Al-Hussainy R, Ramey HJ Jr, Crawford PB (1966) The flow of real gases through porous media. J Pet Technol 18(5):624–636
Bendakhlia H, Aziz K (1989) IPR for solution-gas drive horizontal wells. Paper presented at the 64th annual meeting in San Antonio, Texas, 8–11 Oct 1989
Cheng AM (1990) IPR for Solution Gas-Drive Horizontal Wells. SPE Paper 20720, presented at the 65th Annual SPE meeting held in New Orleans, September 23–26.
Craft BC, Hawkins MF, Terry RE (1991) Applied petroleum reservoir engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs
Dake LP (1978) Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam
Fetkovich MJ (1973) The isochronal testing of oil wells. Paper presented at the SPE 48th annual meeting, Las Vegas, 30 Sept–3 Oct 1973
Giger FM, Reiss LH, Jourdan AP (1984) The reservoir engineering aspect of horizontal drilling. Paper presented at the SPE 59th annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, Texas, 16–19 Sept 1984
Golan M, Whitson CH (1986) Well performance, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Guo B, Ghalambor A (2005) Natural gas engineering handbook. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston
Klins MA, Majher MW (1992) Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged or Improved Wells Producing Under Solution-Gas Drive. SPE Paper 19852. JPT, 1357–1363 Dec 1992.
Klins M, Clark L (1993) An improved method to predict future IPR curves. SPE Res Eng 8:243–248
Lea JF, Nickens HV, Mike R (2008) Gas well deliquification wells, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Boston
Lee WJ, Wattenbarger RA (1996) Gas reservoir engineering. In: SPE textbook series. Richardson, Texas
Lyons WC, Plisga GJ (eds) (2005) Standard handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford
Muskat M, Evinger HH (1942) Calculations of theoretical productivity factor. Trans AIME 146:126–139
Standing MB (1970) Inflow performance relationships for damaged wells producing by solution-gas drive. JPT 1970:1399–1400
Tarek A (2010) Reservoir engineering handbook, 3rd edn. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Vogel JV (1968) Inflow performance relationships for solution-gas drive wells. Trans AIME 243:83–91
Wiggins ML (1993) Generalized inflow performance relationships for three phase flow. Paper presented at the SPE production operations symposium, Oklahoma City, 21–23 Mar 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Exercises
Exercises
- Ex 9.1 :
-
An oil well is flowing at a rate of 420 STB/day under steady state conditions. The wellbore flowing pressure is 2750 psia. The reservoir thickness is 28 f. and permeability of 62 mD. The wellbore and reservoir radii are 0.325 f. and 700 f. respectively. A result from well test conducted on the well shows that it was damaged with skin of 2.87. PVT report gave the oil FVF as 1.356 bbl/STB and oil viscosity of 2.108 cp. Calculate:
-
The reservoir pressure
-
The absolute open flow potential
-
The productivity index
- Ex 9.2 :
-
The following reservoir and flow-test data are available on an oil well:
Average reservoir pressure | 3560 psia |
Bubble point pressure | 2600 psia |
Flow bottom hole pressure from flow test | 2930 psia |
Flow rate from flow test | 300 STB/day |
Generate the IPR data of the well.
- Ex 9.3 :
-
An oil well is producing from an undersaturated reservoir that is characterized by a bubble-point pressure of 2500 psig. The current average reservoir pressure is 3750 psig. Available flow test data show that the well produced 379 STB/day at a stabilized Pwf of 3050 psig. Construct the current IPR data by using:
-
Vogel’s correlation
-
Wiggins’ method
-
Klins and Majcher method
-
Standing method
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okotie, S., Ikporo, B. (2019). Inflow Performance Relationship. In: Reservoir Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02393-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02393-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02392-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02393-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)