Abstract
This paper aims to assess the walkability of Thessaloniki, Greece, via individuals’ perceptions about the influence of the environmental factors of functionality, safety, aesthetic, and points of interest on their pedestrian behavior. The survey’s participants were 117 men and 152 women, from 15 to 78 years old, who came from 12 municipalities of the greater Thessaloniki area. The participants responded to a questionnaire which was based on valid and reliable previous respective questionnaires and walkability audits. The questionnaire was formulated on an online Internet platform and the data were collected in October 2017. The results revealed a variability of the assessment results among the different municipalities of Thessaloniki. Since the data were analyzed on the detailed level of postal codes, many differences were also found even between different postal code areas. Almost all areas were found to be insufficient in terms of functional characteristics. The suburban areas suffer from lack of pedestrians’ facilities, while urban areas from many obstacles on the existing facilities. In contrast, the proximity of points of interest was found to be very satisfactory. Regarding the safety of the pedestrians’ environment, it was perceived as of medium level whereas it was higher in the Thessaloniki city center. The pedestrians reported dysphoria from air pollution, mostly in neighborhoods with high density and vehicle traffic. Dirty pavements, lack of greenery, and ugly buildings bother citizens while walking. The findings are discussed with respect to practical implications in urban planning and people’s quality of life.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rastogi, R.: Promotion of non-motorized modes as a sustainable transportation option: policy and planning issues. Curr. Sci. 100(9), 1340–1348 (2011). http://www.jstor.org/stable/24076599
Krambeck, H.V.: The global walkability index. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2006). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34409
Gallin, N.: Quantifying pedestrian friendliness – guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Road Transp. Res. 10(1), 47–55 (2001)
Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (2010)
Sisiopiku, V.P., Byrd, J., Chittoor, A.: Application of Level-of-Service methods for evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2002, 117–124 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2002-15
Lo, R.H.: Walkability: what is it? J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2(2), 145–166 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867
Winters, Μ., Buehler, R., Götschi, T.: Policies to promote active travel: evidence from reviews of the literature. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 4(3), 278–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x
NZ Transport Agency: Pedestrian planning and design guide. Land Transport New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand (2009)
Aghaabbasi, M., Moeinaddini, M., Zaly Shah, M., Asadi-Shekari, Z.: A new assessment model to evaluate the microscale sidewalk design factors at the neighborhood level. J. Transp. Health 5, 97–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012
Burden, D.: Street design guidelines for healthy neighborhoods. Transp. Res. E-Circ. E-C019(B-1), 1–15 (2000). http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec019/Ec019_b1.pdf
Galanis, A., Eliou, N.: Development and implementation of an audit tool for the pedestrian built environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 48, 3143–3152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1280
Mehta, V.: Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 1(3), 217–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480
Moudon, A., Hess, P., Snyder, M., Stanilov, K.: Effects of site design and pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1578, 48–55 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3141/1578-07
Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., Donovan, R.: Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(8), 1693–1703 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6
Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D., Saelens, B.E., Kraft, M.K.: Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 38(4), 249–268 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003
Mateo-Babiano, Ι.: Pedestrian’s needs matter: examining Manila’s walking environment. Transp. Policy 45, 107–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008
Moudon, A., Lee, C.: Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments. Am. J. Health Promot. 18(1), 21–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
Jensen, W.A., Brown, B.B., Smith, K.R., Brewer, S.C., Amburgey, J.W., McIff, B.: Active transportation on a complete street: perceived and audited walkability correlates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(9), 1014:1–1014:19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091014
Brownson, R.C., Hoehner, C.M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., Sallis, J.F.: Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36(4), S99.e12–S123.e12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Black, J.B., Chen, D.: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am. J. Public Health 93(9), 1552–1558 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
Cerin, E., Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D.: Neighborhood environment walkability scale: validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 38(9), 1682–1691 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
Spittaels, H., Foster, C., Oppert, J.-M., Rutter, H., Oja, P., Sjöström, M., De Bourdeaudhuijr, I.: Assessment of environmental correlates of physical activity: development of a European questionnaire. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 6(39), 1–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-39
Lee, C., Moudon, A.V.: The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 11(3), 204–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
Oliver, L.N., Schuurman, Ν., Hall, Α.W.: Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int. J. Health Geogr. 6(41), 1–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-41
Pikora, T.J., Bull, L.F.C., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., Donovan, R.J.: Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 23(3), 187–194 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
San Francisco Department of Public Health: The Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI): an assessment of the physical condition of streets and intersection. San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA (2008)
Millington, C., Ward Thompson, C., Rowe, D., Aspinall, P., Fitzsimons, C., Nelson, N., Mutrie, N.: Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). Health Place 15(2), 474–481 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gkavra, R., Nalmpantis, D., Genitsaris, E., Naniopoulos, A. (2019). The Walkability of Thessaloniki: Citizens’ Perceptions. In: Nathanail, E., Karakikes, I. (eds) Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility. CSUM 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 879. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02304-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02305-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)