Skip to main content

Patents and Enterprise Innovation in Network Industries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

We investigate factors that determine product innovation in network industries. We develop a demand-pull-technology-push model of enterprise innovation and find that enterprise innovation depends on firm’s specific abilities to extend the network, consumer preferences over product price and network coverage, and the extent of knowledge spillovers in the network industry. Enterprise innovation increases when consumers value the network development more and when consumers are less sensitive to price increases. The enterprise innovation rises if effective R&D investments to a higher extent translate into network extending. The enterprise innovation is larger when the size of knowledge spillovers in the network industry is smaller. Enterprise innovation under no patent protection is higher or equal to the enterprise innovation under patent protection. Under patent protection, individual sunk costs of R&D increase and constitute a significant disincentive to invest in research and development.

This paper was supported by funds from the National Science Centre (NCN), Poland, through grant No 2016/22/M/HS4/00361.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J., & Nadiri, M. (1989). Research and development and intra-industry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Janne, O. (1999). Technological globalisation and innovative centres: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy, 28, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, D., Cantu, C., & Tunisini, A. (2012). Actors’ heterogeneity in innovation networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 780–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1986). The theory of technological competition. In J. Stiglitz & G. Mathewson (Eds.), New developments in the analysis of market structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, R., Slaets, P., & Cassiman, B. (1992). The degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective R&D. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1996). The geographical sources of competitiveness of firms. Some results of a new survey. Transnational Corporations, 5, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbicz, M. (2005). Niedorozwój a korzyści skali. In W. Pacho (Ed.), Szkice ze współczesnej teorii ekonomii. Warszawa: SGH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. (1995). Do spillovers undermine the incentive to innovate? In S. Dowrick (Ed.), Economic approaches to innovation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope and spillover: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J., & Wood, M. (1993). The globalisation of production and technology. Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, U. (1999). Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: An empirical assessment of alternative approaches, ZEW Discussion Papers No. 99–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., Muller, E., & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, T., Luski, I., & Wettstein, D. (2003). Innovative activity and sunk cost. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1111–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbowski, A. (2016). The elasticity-based approach to enterprise innovation. International Journal of Management and Economics, 49, 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbowski, A., & Prokop, J. (2013). Controversy over the economic justifications for patent protection. Procedia—Economics and Finance, 5, 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, D., & Neary, J. (1997). Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. American Economic Review, 87, 641–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Sung, T. (2005). Schumpeter’s legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D. Research Policy, 34, 914–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., & Reiss, P. (1988). Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. RAND Journal of Economics, 19, 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manez, J., Rochina-Barrachina, M., Sanchis, A., & Sanchis, J. (2009). The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57, 712–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2000). The economic determinants of innovation (Occasional Paper No. 25). Industry Canada Research Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31, 1389–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2010). Networks. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25, 1141–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, J., & Karbowski, A. (2013). R&D cooperation and industry cartelization. Economics Discussion Paper Series, 2013-41, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. (1981). On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach. The Review of Economic Studies, 48, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1967). Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (2004). Foundations of economic analysis of law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition and industry performance. Econometrica, 52, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1987). Technological change, sunk costs and competition. Brookings papers on economic activity, 3, 883–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1992). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 82, 1307–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfl, A. (1998). Spillover effects—An incentive to cooperate in R&D?. Halle Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, I. (1995). Technological diversification in the multinational corporation—Historical evolution and future prospects. In R. Schiattarella (Ed.), New challenges for Europe and international business. Rome: Confindustria.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Karbowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karbowski, A. (2018). Patents and Enterprise Innovation in Network Industries. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Time Series Data Methods in Applied Economic Research. ICOAE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02194-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics