Skip to main content

An Analysis of Barriers to Embedding Moral Principles in a Robot

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Computational Science and Computing (ISCSC 2018 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 877))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

One of the difficulties to embed moral principles in a robot is the barriers due to moral principles themselves. The barriers are analysed from four specific topics. The first is about the difference between value judgments and fact judgments. The following analyses focus on the specific moral barriers resulted respectively from deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. These analyses show that it is much harder than what we thought to make a moral robot. If we forget the reductionism, the method used commonly in moral philosophy, we should find a new direction to solve the problem. It is highly possible that human beings can find a better way to improve their own moral cultivation while they try to make moral machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hume, D.: Treatise of Human Nature, pp. 469–470. Wikisource (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nietzsche, F.: The Will to Power, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale, p. 535. Vintage Books, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Smith, p. 41. Macmillan and Co., Limited, London (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kant, I.: Critique of Practical Reason, trans. M. Gregor, p. 129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Plato: The Republic, trans. C. Reeve, p. 6. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bentham, J.: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, p. 14. Liberty Fund Inc., Indianapolis (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mill, J.: Utilitarianism, p. 56. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mill, J.: Utilitarianism, pp. 56-57. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. I.7.1098a

    Google Scholar 

  10. Copleston, F.: A History of Philosophy, vol. 2, p. 53. Image Books/Doubleday and Co., New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, p. 21. Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Husserl, E.: Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson, p. 91. Collier-Macmillan, London (1969)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yan, P. (2019). An Analysis of Barriers to Embedding Moral Principles in a Robot. In: Xiong, N., Xiao, Z., Tong, Z., Du, J., Wang, L., Li, M. (eds) Advances in Computational Science and Computing. ISCSC 2018 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02116-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics