Skip to main content

User-Centered-Design Approach to Evaluate the User Acceptance of Seating Postures for Autonomous Driving Secondary Activities in a Passenger Vehicle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Abstract

With the development of autonomous driving technology, the passenger vehicles of the future, would allow drivers to participate in non-driving secondary activities or use-cases. In order to facilitate the non-driving use-cases, the interior and the seating arrangements of autonomous passenger vehicles needs to be designed accordingly, The aim of the study is to derive common seating positions and angles for the different autonomous driving secondary activities from their original environments and then experimentally evaluate the user acceptance of these postures for each secondary activity in a passenger vehicle. A user experience questionnaire (UEQ) approach is used to evaluate the user acceptance of the seating postures for the mentioned autonomous driving secondary activity or use-cases. The secondary activities considered in the study include; use of laptop, use of smartphone, general reading, window gazing and sleeping. The angles used for the seating postures include; seat-pan angle, back rest angle and neck-flexion angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All the angles are referenced to global co-ordinate system, which is vertical 90° and horizontal 0°.

References

  1. Parida, S., Franz, M., Abanteriba, S., Mallavarapu, S.: Autonomous driving cars: future prospects, obstacles, user acceptance and public opinion. In: Stanton (Hg.) Advances in Human Aspects, vol. 786, pp. 318–328 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. SAE International: SAE International’s levels of driving automation for on-road vehicles (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfleging, B., Schmidt, A.: (Non-)Driving-related activities in the car: defining driver activities for manual and automated driving

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and AU. The University of Michigan Transport Research Institute (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B.: Travel time valuation for automated driving: a use-case driven study

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A.: Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamp, I., Kilincsoy, U., Vink, P.: Chosen postures during specific sitting activities. Ergonomics (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.618230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parida, S., Mallavarapu, S., Franz, M., Abanteriba, S.: A literature review of seating and body angles for non-driving secondary activities in autonomous driving vehicles. In: Stanton, N. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Proceedings of the AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 786, pp. 398–409. Springer International PU, [S.l.] (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). IJIMAI (2017). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). IJIMAI (2017). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted in co-operation with BMW Group, Germany and RMIT University, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibashis Parida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parida, S., Mallavarapu, S., Abanteriba, S., Franz, M., Gruener, W. (2019). User-Centered-Design Approach to Evaluate the User Acceptance of Seating Postures for Autonomous Driving Secondary Activities in a Passenger Vehicle. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics