Is Truth Contextual? The Browsing Purpose, the Availability of Comparable Material, and the Web Content Credibility Evaluation

  • Katarzyna AbramczukEmail author
  • Michał Kąkol
  • Radosław Nielek
  • Cezary Biele
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 876)


This paper discusses to what extent the browsing context needs to be taken into account when considering web credibility ratings. We focus on the availability of other websites on the same topic and the browsing purpose as two factors that can potentially influence how people perceive credibility and how accurate their judgments are when contrasted with expert evaluations. We analyze data from an experimental study in which subjects were asked to rate a set of websites on various dimensions in different contexts. We conclude that more context influences how often extreme evaluations are used, which ratings correlate with the declared knowledge of the topic, and which websites features are brought up as important for formulating the final judgment.


Web credibility Subjectivity Judgment context-dependence Credibility experiment Reliability World wide web 



This work is partially supported by Polish National Science Centre grant 2015/19/B/ST6/03179.


  1. 1.
    Wierzbicki, A.: Understanding and measuring credibility. In: Web Content Credibility. Springer, Cham (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, X., Nielek, R., Adamska, P., Wierzbicki, A., Aberer, K.: Towards a highly effective and robust Web credibility evaluation system. Decis. Support Syst. 79, 99–108 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wawer, A., Nielek, R., Wierzbicki, A.: Predicting webpage credibility using linguistic features. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1135–1140. ACM, April, 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielek, R., Wawer, A., Jankowski-Lorek, M., Wierzbicki, A.: Temporal, cultural and thematic aspects of web credibility. In: International Conference on Social Informatics, pp. 419–428. Springer, Cham, November, 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kakol, M., Nielek, R., Wierzbicki, A.: Understanding and predicting web content credibility using the content credibility corpus. Inf. Process. Manag. 53(5), 1043–1061 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarzyna Abramczuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michał Kąkol
    • 2
  • Radosław Nielek
    • 2
  • Cezary Biele
    • 1
  1. 1.National Information Processing InstituteWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Polish-Japanese Academy of Information TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations