Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decentralization and Governance Capacity

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction sets out the major issues the book examines, highlighting the most prominent discussions in the literature on the relationship between decentralization and governance capacity. Noting the ambiguous relationship between decentralization and better governance, the Introduction puts forward the research questions the book addresses, namely ‘how should policymakers decide on the degree of decentralization to ensure the best outcome in public governance?’ and ‘how do governance capacities affect this outcome?’. Explaining the political and practical relevance of these questions, the introduction explains the importance of the issue to public administration, governance, and development studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Working Group 5 (Institutional Capacity) at the Technical Consultation on Decentralization and Rural Development, FAO, Rome, December 1997.

  2. 2.

    Cassette and Paty (2010)’s findings on a panel data set of EU 15 countries contest the Leviathan hypothesis on aggregate government expenditures, by showing the tax autonomy tends to increase local government expenditures by a wide margin in the long run despite limiting central government expenditures, and thus leading to higher aggregate government expenditure.

References

  • Akai, N., & Masayo, S. (2002). Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth: Evidence from State-Level Cross-Section Data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, Y. (2009). Hegemonic Transitions, the State and Crisis in Neoliberal Capitalism. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. F. (1992). Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspective, 16(4), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels. American Economic Review, 90, 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, T., & Feld, L. P. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is There a Relationship? (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2721).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette, J. (1980). Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in the Republican Government. In R. A. Goldwin & W. A. Schambra (Eds.), How Democratic Is the Constitution? (pp. 102–116). Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessette, J. (1994). The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. A. (1996). Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective. Urban Studies, 33(4–5), 703–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., LaFond, A., & Macintyre, K. (2001). Measuring Capacity Building. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. (2003). The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassette, A., & Paty, S. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization and the Size of Government: A European Country Empirical Analysis. Public Choice, 143, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). From Government Decentralization to Decentralized Governance. In G. S. Cheema & D. A. Rondinelli (Eds.), Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. M., & Peterson, S. B. (1999). Administrative Decentralization: Strategies for Developing Countries. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, R. C., & Manor, J. (1998). Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoodi, H., & Zou, H.-F. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, P., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, K. (2001). Political Obstacles to Decentralization: Evidence from Argentina and the Philippines. Development and Change, 32(1), 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from Around the World. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L., Zimmermann, H., & Döring, T. (2003). Föderalismus, Dezentralität and Wirtschaftswachstum. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 72, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiszbein, A. (1997). Decentralization and Local Capacity: Some Thoughts on a Controversial Relationship. Rome: Economic Development Institute—The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, B. (2007). The Politics of Deepening Local Democracy: Decentralization, Party Institutionalization, and Participation. Comparative Politics, 39(2), 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going Local: Decentralization, Democracy and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., Kristian, S., & Olle, T. (2004). Politicising Democracy: Local Politics and Democratization in Developing Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, K. R., Sr. (2000). Corruption and Development in Africa. In K. R. Hope, Sr. & B. C. Chikulo (Eds.), Corruption and Development in Africa. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iimi, A. (2005). Decentralization and Economic Growth Revisited: An Empirical Note. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(3), 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J., & Zou, H. (2005). Fiscal Decentralization, Revenue and Expenditure Assignments, and Growth in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiggundu, M. (1989). Managing Organizations in Developing Countries: An Operational and Strategic Approach. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodras, J. (1997). Restructuring the State: Devolution, Privatization, and the Geographic Redistribution of Power and Capacity in Governance. In L. Staeheli, J. Kodras, & C. Flint (Eds.), State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society (pp. 79–96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998). Rethinking Decentralization in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manor, J. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannyonjo, J., & Okot, N. (2012). Decentralization, Local Government Capacity and Efficiency of Health Service Delivery in Uganda. Nairobi, Kenya: African Economic Research Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olowu, D., & Wunsch, J. S. (2004). Local Governance in Africa: The Challenges of Democratic Decentralization. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxhorn, P. (2004). Unraveling the Puzzle of Decentralization. In P. Oxhorn, J. S. Tulchin, & A. D. Seele (Eds.), Decentralization, Democratic Governance and Civil Society in Comparative Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxhorn, P., Tulchin, J. S., & Seele, A. D. (2004). Decentralization, Democratic Governance and Civil Society in Comparative Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, S., & Roy, J. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization and Development: How Crucial is Local Politics? (Discussion Paper 5286). IZA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2005). Decentralization: A Central Concept in Contemporary Public Management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 371–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Rodríguez, R. A., Hankla, C. R., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Heredia-Ortiz, E. (2018). Rethinking the Political Economy of Decentralization: How Elections and Parties Shape the Provision of Local Public Goods. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prud’homme, R. (1995). The Dangers of Decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2011). Is Fiscal Decentralization Harmful for Economic Growth? Evidence from the OECD Countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 619–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D., Nellis, J., & Cheema, G. (1983). Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudebeck, L., Törnquist, O., & Rojas, V. (1998). Democratization in the Third World: Concrete Cases in Comparative Perspective. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, F. (2001). Decentralization Theories Revisited: Lessons from Uganda. Ryukoku: RISS Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, F. (2005). Foundations for Local Governance: Decentralization in Comparative Perspectives. Germany: Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S. K. (1995). Civilizations and World Systems: Studying World-Historical Change. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A., & Thompson, T. (2004). Implementing Decentralized Local Governance: A Treacherous Road with Potholes, Detours, and Road Closures. World Bank Policy Research (Working Paper 3353). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, C. K. (2006). Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, C. K. (2014). Governance, Governmentality, and Governability: Constraints and Possibilities of Decentralization in South Asia. Keynote Address, International Conference on Local Representation of Power in South Asia. Lahore: Department of Political Science, GC University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, Dimensions, Myths, and Challenges. Public Administration and Development, 23(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, P. J., Gómez, E. J., & Peterson, G. E. (2006). Decentralization in Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorens, J. (2009). The Partisan Logic of Decentralization in Europe. Regional & Federal Studies, 19(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansel, D. (2005). Local Decentralisation and Local Economic Growth: A Cross-Sectional Examination of US Metropolitan Areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, W. (2001). Introduction. In W. Stohr, J. Edralin, & D. Mani (Eds.), New Regional Development Paradigms: Decentralization, Governance and the New Planning for Local-Level Development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. (1995). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (pp. 295–316). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, U. (2003). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries. Fiscal Studies, 24(3), 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A., Mansfield, H. C., & Winthrop, D. (2000). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralisation. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. (1999). Central-Local Relations: Themes and Issues. In M. Turner (Ed.), Central-Local Relations in Asia-Pacific: Convergence or Divergence? London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2002). Emerging Market Democracies: East Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E., Garman, C. B., & Haggard, S. (1999). The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 34(1), 7–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woller, G. M., & Phillips, K. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and LDC Econometric Growth: An empirical Investigation. Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2018). World Bank Group. Retrieved July 16, 2018, from World Bank Web Site: www.worldbank.org/en/topic/communitydrivendevelopment/brief/Decentralization.

  • Xie, D., Zou, H., & Davoodi, H. (1999). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 228–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. (1898). Administrative Centralization and Decentralization in France. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 11, 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., & Zou, H. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tan, E. (2019). Introduction. In: Decentralization and Governance Capacity . Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02047-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics