Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making Democracy Work for Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy and Growth in the Twenty-first Century

  • 366 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter moves from the discussion of the transformation of civil life and democracy in the era of the technological revolution. Rapid and profound contextual changes have affected citizens’ understanding of the values underpinning the concept of democracy and caused behavioural consequences. Citizens as residents of cities, towns and villages have countered change by retiring into their own private space and distancing themselves from their institutions and public affairs, causing a pervasive loss of social capital across territorial communities. The chapter proceeds to analyse how the new technologies can also provide opportunities to reverse the trends of economic dislocation, social anomie and democratic disengagement, by enabling multi-level governance with new modalities of participation by citizens’ in decision-making, thus increasing the community’s stock of social capital. The discussion turns to how territorial communities are transformed when they embrace a socially participated trajectory of sustainable economic and social growth, because of their capacity to adopt and adapt to IT new developments that help to value and employ their specific set of resources. An updated definition of innovation is derived and offered: as technology-enabled social transformation drawing on “societal knowledge”, a process which moves resources towards innovators to produce community-wide benefits. The chapter discusses how the linking of technological innovation, civic engagement and prosperity may occur and it closes with the analysis of the scenario of the “democracy of the future”, expressed through a range of means of participation, IT-supported policy choices and proposals, and in the end better performing institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is also possible that other factors, for instance, the price of raw materials like oil, may distort the comparative performances shown by the figure. This may, for instance, be the case of Russia (whereas, there are also some developed countries whose growth is positively impacted by commodities, like Norway). We, however, believe that the length of the period we are observing and the strength of the correlations are enough to make findings statistically significant.

Bibliography

  • Ansell, C. (2000). “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe”. Governance, 13(3): 303–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P., and Newman, K. S. (eds.). (2010). Growing Gaps: Educational Inequality Around the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. (2008). “Cohesion Policy”. In Graziano, P., and Vink, M. (eds.) Europeanization (pp. 239–252). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. M. (2004). “Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studies”. Public Administration, 82(2): 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro Robert, J. (1996). “Democracy and Growth”. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A. (2016). “Smart Specialisation and Regional Innovation Policy”. Welsh Economic Review, 24: 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, N., Carvalho, L., and Nunes, S. (2015). “A Methodology to Measure Innovation in the European Union Through the National Innovation System”. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 6(2): 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1993). “The Nature of the Firm”. In Williamson, O., and Winter, S. (eds.) The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. (2013). La Famiglia. Il Genoma che fa Vivere la Società. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1998). “The Discipline of Innovation”. Leader to Leader, 1998(9): 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (1995). “Green Paper on Inovation”. Directorate Dissemination and Exploitation of R&TD Results, Technology Transfer and Innovation. http://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/com95_688_en.pdf.

  • European Commission (EC). (2016). “Mapping Study on Social Enterprise Eco-Systems. Update Country Report on Italy”. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina, E. (2012). Social Capital in Europe: A Comparative Regional Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. G. (2013). “Five Studies on the Causes and Consequences of Voter Turnout”. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11156810.

  • Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodermann, L. (2018). Exploratory Study on Circular Economy. A Comparative Analysis of Theory and Practice. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, E. S. (2002). In Search of Chinese Democracy: Civil Opposition in Nationalist China, 1929–1949. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbikpi, B., and Grote, J. R. (2002). From Democratic Government to Participatory Governance. In Participatory Governance (pp. 17–34). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, F., and Nanetti, R. (2016). Innovation, Democracy, Efficiency: Exploring the Innovation Puzzle within the European Union’s Regional Development Policies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A., and Sutton, R. I. (2000). “Building an Innovation Factory”. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., and Marks, G. (2001). “Types of Multi-Level Governance”. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 5(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., and Hooghe, L. (2003). National Identity and Support for European Integration (No. SP IV 2003-202). WZB Discussion Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maw, P. (2013). Transport and the Industrial City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. (ed.). (2017). Shaping Social Entreprise: Understanding Institutional Context and Influence. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2004). “Governing as Governance”. Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo, 16: 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, K. (2001). “Networks in Innovation Research and Innovation Policy—An Introduction”. In Innovation Networks (pp. 3–23). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kung, H., and Schmid, L. (2015). “Innovation, Growth, and Asset Prices”. The Journal of Finance, 70(3): 1001–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, R. (1995). “Regional Development in Italy: Social Capital and the Mezzogiorno”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11(2): 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, R. (2017). “Il Programma di Coesione della Strategia Europa 2020 Come Politica Economica Europea”. In Marini, M. (ed.) Le Politiche di Coesione Territoriale: Un Confronto tra Italia e Stati Uniti d’America. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, D., and Gillies, L. E. (eds.). (2017). The Legal Challenges of Social Media. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoharan, A., and Holzer M. (eds.). (2012). E-Governance and Civic Engagement. Factors and Determinants of E-Democracy. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraffi, M., Newton, K., van Deth, J., and Whiteley, P. (1999). Social Capital and European Democracy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo, J., and Brebbia, C. A. (2018). Urban Growth and the Circular Economy. Southampton: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanetti, R. (2009). “Bridging the Gap Through Social Capital Accumulation: Ethnic Reconciliation and Economic Development in Gorizia (Italy), Nova Gorica (Slovenia), and Sempeter Vertojba (Slovenia)”. Studies in Urban and Regional Planning, 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanetti, R. (2012). “Building the Future: Strategic Visions for American Cities and Their Relevance for European Cities”. In Cappellini, R., et al. (eds.) La citta’ nell’economia della conoscenza. Milan: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanetti, R., and Holguin, R. (2016). Social Capital in Development Planning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1963). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Frascati Manual 2002, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2): 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paraskevopoulos, C. J. (2006). “EU Enlargement and Multi-Level Governance in European Public Policy-Making: Actors, Institutions and Learning”. In Paraskevopoulos, C. J., Getimis, P., and Rees, N. (eds.) Adapting to EU Multi-Level Governance: Regional and Environmental Policies in Cohesion and CEE Countries (pp. 3–24). Ashgate: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paraskevopoulos, C. J., and Leonardi, R. (2004). “Introduction: Adaptational Pressures and Social Learning in European Regional Policy–Cohesion (Greece, Ireland and Portugal) vs. CEE (Hungary, Poland) Countries”. Regional and Federal Studies, 14(3): 315–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say”. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2): 149–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1997). “Policy Transfers Between Governments: The Case of Administrative Reforms”. West European Politics, 20(4): 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., and Pierre, J. (1998). “Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2): 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., and Peters, G. B. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2017). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital”. Journal of Democracy, 6(1): 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our Kids. The American Dream in Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). “Endogenous Technological Change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2): 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J., and Czempiel, E.-O. (1992). “Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Government”. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L., and D’Antoni, G. (eds.). (2010). Social Capital, Corporate Social Responsibility, Economic Behavior and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanholz, J., Fraham, T., and Stoll, P.-T. (2018). Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1987). “We’d Better Watch Out”. In Cohen, S. S., and Zysman, J. (eds.) Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy (p. 36). New York: New York Times Book Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., and Lampe, C. (2008). “Social Capital, Self-Esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: A Longitudinal Analysis”. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6): 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”. International Social Science Journal, 50(155): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (1998). “The Development of Policy Network Analyses: From Modest Origins to Overarching Frameworks”. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4): 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuorto, D. (2004). “Voto e Non Voto Tra Partecipazione, Impegno e Astensionismo”. Il Mulino, 6: 1115–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuorto, D. (2014). “L’Aumento dell’Astensionismo in un’Elezione di Crisi”. In Chiaromonte, A., and DeSio, L. (eds.) Terremoto elettorale (pp. 75–96). Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, F. (2013). L’Efficacia dei Fondi Strutturali Europei. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, D. (2014). The Fissured Workplace. Why Work Became so Bad for so Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, V., and Page, E. (2007). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of European Officials in European Nations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zider, B. (1998). “How Venture Capital Works”. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy

    Francesco Grillo

  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Raffaella Y. Nanetti

Authors
  1. Francesco Grillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raffaella Y. Nanetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Grillo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grillo, F., Nanetti, R.Y. (2018). Making Democracy Work for Innovation. In: Democracy and Growth in the Twenty-first Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02014-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02014-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02013-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02014-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation