Skip to main content

Abstract

Severe tissue damage can result from BBI from as little as 2 h in situ. The most important mechanism is that of electrolysis of fluid in local oesophageal tissue which generates a current, and subsequently hydroxide, at the negative pole of the battery. The type of button battery is also important: the ubiquitous lithium button batteries have a higher voltage and capacitance than other types resulting in an increased production of hydroxide and therefore more tissue damage. Other mechanisms include pressure necrosis and leakage of alkaline electrolytes from the battery itself (however, this is supposedly less of a problem with lithium batteries which is said to cause less mucosal irritation). Delayed complications include but are not limited to: oesophageal perforation; oesophageal stricture; tracheo-oesphageal fistula; exsanguination after fistulation into a major blood vessel (e.g. aorto-oesophageal fistula); and vocal cord paralysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

Image 5

  • Lee JH, Lee JH, Shim JO et al (2016) Foreign body ingestion in children: should button batteries in the stomach be urgently removed? Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 19(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L (2010) Preventing battery ingestions: an analysis of 8648 cases. Paediatrics 125(6):1178–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thabet MH, Basha WM, Askar S (2013) Button battery foreign bodies in children: hazards, management and recommendations. Biomed Res Int 2013:846091

    Article  Google Scholar 

Image 15

Image 19

Image 28

  • Chowdhury MM, Chakraborty S (2015) Imaging of congenital lung malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 24(4):168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daltro P, Fricke BL, Kuroki I, Domingues R, Donnelly LF (2004) CT of congenital lung lesions in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1497–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed Abdul Wajid L, Sinha I, Gupta R (2017) An infant with persistent tachypnoea. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 102(4):222–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Image 30

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paddock, M., Offiah, A.C. (2019). Test 9. In: Paediatric Radiology Rapid Reporting for FRCR Part 2B. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01965-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01965-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01964-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01965-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics