Advertisement

The Effect of Underground Stories on the Dynamic Response of High-Rise Buildings

  • Lina JaberEmail author
  • Yehya Temsah
  • Yasser El-Mossallamy
  • Fadi Hage Chehade
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The majority of high-rise buildings are designed with one or several underground stories in the urban area. However, many researchers don’t incorporate it in the dynamic analysis assuming that the building is fixed at the ground level. This study aims to investigate the effect of the underground stories on the dynamic response of RC building. This is achieved by comparing the behavior of buildings without underground story with those with multi-level underground stories. In this scope, two dimensional finite element models are generated, where three buildings of 12, 16 and 24 stories resting on loose soil are modeled. The analysis is performed under the effect of a strong earthquake input motion by the use of PLAXIS software. The non-linear small strain hardening constitutive model is employed for an accurate simulation of the soil behavior. Based on the results, the embedded underground stories show a significant alteration of the structural dynamic response. This paper provides recommendations on the importance of including the underground stories during analysis.

Keywords

Soil-structure interaction Underground stories Earthquake Slenderness 

References

  1. Brinkgreve, R.B.J., Engin, E., Engin, H.K.: Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands. Numer. Methods Geotech. Eng. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1201/b10551-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caglar, N., Garip, Z.S., Atasoy, S.: The effect of basement storey on the response of RC buildings settled on soft soil. In: 2nd International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science (2014)Google Scholar
  3. Dutta, S., Roy, R.: A critical review on idealization and modeling for interaction among soil-foundation-structure system. Comput. Struct. (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00115-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dutta, S., Bhattacharya, K., Roy, R.: Response of low-rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El Ganainy, H., El Naggar, M.H.: Seismic performance of three-dimensional frame structures with underground stories. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gajo, A., Muir, W.D.: Severn-trent sand: a kinematic hardening constitutive model for sands: the q-p formulation. Géotechnique (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.5.595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hudson, M., Idriss, I.M., Bekaie, M.: QUAD4M: a computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures incorporating a compliant base. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis (1994)Google Scholar
  8. Kuhlemeyer, R.L., Lysmer, J.: Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J. Soil Dyn. Div. 99, 421 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Lysmer, J., Kuhlemeyer, R.L.: Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 95, 859 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Naim, F., Tileyliouglu, S., Alimoradi, A., J. Stewart.: Impact of foundation modeling on the accuracy of response history analysis of a tall building. In: SMIP08 Seminar Proceedings (2008)Google Scholar
  11. Newmark, N.M.: A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 85, 67 (1959)Google Scholar
  12. Raychowdhury, P.: Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil–structure interaction (SSI). Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct2010.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saad, G., Saddik, F., Najjar, S.: Impact of soil structure interaction on the seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings with underground stories. In: Lisboa Conference American University of Beirut, Lebanon (2012)Google Scholar
  14. Shakib, H.: Evaluation of dynamic eccentricity by considering soil-structure interaction: a proposal for seismic design codes. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tabatabaiefar, R., Massumi, A.: A Simplified method to determine seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment resisting building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lina Jaber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yehya Temsah
    • 1
  • Yasser El-Mossallamy
    • 2
  • Fadi Hage Chehade
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentBeirut Arab UniversityBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.Structural Engineering DepartmentAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  3. 3.University Institute of TechnologyLebanese UniversitySaidaLebanon
  4. 4.School of Science and TechnologyBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations