Abstract
The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics and general relativity (GR) are the two main modern theories used to describe fundamental interactions in Nature. The former is able to describe experimental data in a consistent framework regarding electromagnetic, weak and strong interactions while the latter describes the gravitational one. In this thesis only the Standard Model of particle physics will be described. Particular attention will be made on the quark sector, providing a description of the weak interaction structure of the heavy flavour sector of particle physics. The heavy flavour sector is encoded in the SM through the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa (CKM) matrix. This is the main domain of study at the LHCb experiment (see Chap. 2).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Gravity is not included in the model; the gravitational force is negligible in particle physics domain. Furthermore, at the currently accessible energies in the laboratory, gravitational force effects would be too small to be observed.
- 2.
SUSY provide candidates (neutralinos, the super-symmetric partner of neutrinos) to the dark matter and solve some problems of the Standard Model, so, maybe, one day, the current picture of fundamental particles will be extended including sleptons and squarks.
- 3.
Unification of theories in physics is not a novel concept. As example for unification of theories, the Lorentz tensor \(F_{\mu \nu }\) was able to unify magnetic and electric forces under the same picture.
- 4.
Also factorization and infrared safety in theoretical predictions play a crucial role.
- 5.
In gauge theory, the interaction field are achieved by substitution of the partial derivative with a covariant derivative, allowing to preserve the gauge symmetry.
- 6.
Although the Dirac neutrino approach fits well with the SM picture of mass generation via Higgs mechanism, it also suggests that Higgs-neutrino interaction is 12 orders of magnitude weaker than that of the top quark. In such picture, the hierarchy of masses of SM particles is still an open question in physics.
- 7.
It is also possible to use other relations but in all the other relations \(\lambda \) appears to different powers in the unitarity condition.
References
M. Borsato, Study of the \(B^0 \rightarrow K^{\ast 0}e^+ e^-\) decay with the LHCb detector and development of a novel concept of PID detector: the Focusing DIRC. Ph.D thesis, Santiago de Compostela U (2015)
Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al., Review of particle physics. Chin. Phys. C40(10), 100001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001
ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B716, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214
CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B716, 30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235
E. Fermi, An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. Z. Phys. 88, 161 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351864
E. Noether, Invariant variation problems. Gott. Nachr. 1918, 235 (1918). https://doi.org/10.1080/00411457108231446. arXiv:physics/0503066
T.D. Lee, C.-N. Yang, Question of parity conservation in weak interactions. Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.254
C.S. Wu, Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay. Phys. Rev. 105, 1413 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413
M. Goldhaber, L. Grodzins, A.W. Sunyar, Helicity of neutrinos. Phys. Rev. 109, 1015 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.1015
Gargamelle Neutrino, F.J. Hasert et al., Observation of neutrino like interactions without muon or electron in the Gargamelle Neutrino experiment. Nucl. Phys. B73, 1 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90038-8
S.L. Glashow, Partial symmetries of weak interactions. Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2
P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of Gauge Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508
P.W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without Massless Bosons. Phys. Rev. 145, 1156 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.145.1156
S. Weinberg, A model of leptons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264
A. Salam, Weak and electromagnetic interactions. Conf. Proc. C680519, 367 (1968)
F. Englert, R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321
P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9
G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, T.W.B. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585
A. Collaboration, Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data. Phys. Lett. B 726, 120 (2013)
J.J. Thomson, Cathode rays. Phil. Mag. 44, 293 (1897). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449708621070
J. Chadwick, Possible existence of a neutron. Nature 129, 312 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1038/129312a0
C.D. Anderson, The positive electron. Phys. Rev. 43, 491 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.43.491
S.H. Neddermeyer, C.D. Anderson, Note on the nature of cosmic ray particles. Phys. Rev. 51, 884 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.884
H. Yukawa, On the interaction of elementary particles. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 17, 48 (1935)
M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of Baryons and Mesons. Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3
Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,
N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.531
S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, L. Maiani, Weak interactions with Lepton-Hadron symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285
E598 Collaboration, J.J. Aubert et al., Experimental observation of a heavy particle. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1404
SLAC-SP-017 Collaboration, J.E. J.Ãugustin et al., Discovery of a narrow resonance in \(e^{+}e^{-}\) annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1406 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1406
J.H. Christenson, J.W. Cronin, V.L. Fitch, R. Turlay, Evidence for the \(2\pi \) decay of the \(K_{2}^{0}\) meson. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 138 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.138
M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.49.652
S.W. Herb, Observation of a dimuon resonance at 9.5GeV in 400GeV proton-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 252 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.252
CDF Collaboration, C. Collaboration, Evidence for top quark production in \(\bar{p}p\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 1.8\) TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 225 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.225, arXiv:hep-ex/9405005
B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium. Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957)
B. Pontecorvo, Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge. Sov. Phys. JETP 7, 172 (1958)
Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles. Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.28.870
L.-L. Chau, W.-Y. Keung, Comments on the parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1802 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1802
L. Wolfenstein, Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1945 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1945
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quagliani, R. (2018). Introduction to Theory. In: Study of Double Charm B Decays with the LHCb Experiment at CERN and Track Reconstruction for the LHCb Upgrade. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01839-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01839-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01838-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01839-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)