Abstract
Emergency analysis and technogenic risk assessment are the key concepts of the technogenic safety research. There are some methods used for their investigation, for example, the event tree analysis method. But the high complexity of building and verification of event trees of complex technogenic systems significantly weakens the effectiveness of the practical application of this method and requires development of special software and modification of the standard methodology. This paper describes a new algorithm for computer-aided event tree synthesis for technical systems in petrochemistry. The proposed algorithm is based on the original model of the object technical state dynamics which describes cause-effect relationships between the parameters in different time intervals and a case-based reasoning approach. The model of the technical state dynamics is formalized in the form of the technical states matrix. The case-based reasoning approach is used for implementation of the algorithm proposed. The elements of software, including functions, the architecture and the information process of event tress synthesis are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Faisal, I., Abbasi, S.: Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: a new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J. Hazard. Mater. 87(1–3), 23–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00169-2
Henley, E., Kumamoto, H.: Reliability Engineering and Risk Assessment. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1981)
Kumamoto, H.: Chapter 7 – Fault tree analysis. In: Fundamental Studies in Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 249–311. Elsevier, New York (1993)
Papazoglou, I.: Functional block diagrams and automated construction of event trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 61(3), 185–214 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00011-8
Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Synthesis and analysis of temporal fault trees with PANDORA: the time of Priority AND gates. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2, 368–382 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nahs.2006.05.003
Wang, Y., Teague, T., West, H., Mannan, S., O’Connor, M.: A new algorithm for computer-aided fault tree synthesis. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 15(4), 265–277 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00011-6
Yang, Z.-X., Zheng, Y.-Y., Xue, J.-X.: Development of automatic fault tree synthesis system using decision matrix. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 121(1), 49–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.021
Bobbio, A., Ciancamerla, E., Franceschinis, G., Gaeta, R., Minichino, M., Portinale, L.: Sequential application of heterogeneous models for the safety analysis of a control system: a case study. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81, 269–280 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00091-7
Wang, Y., Li, Q., Chang, M., Chen, H., Zang, G.: Research on fault diagnosis expert system based on the neural network and the fault tree technology. Procedia Eng. 31, 1206–1210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1164
ISO/IEC 31010:2009 Risk management - Risk assessment techniques
Majdara, A., Wakabayashi, T.: Component-based modeling of systems for automated fault tree generation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(6), 1076–1086 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.12.003
Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Veitch, B., Amyotte, P.: Methodology for computer-aided fault tree analysis. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 85(1), 70–80 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1205/psep06002
Risk spectrum homepage. http://www.riskspectrum.com/en/risk/. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
FaultTree+ homepage. https://www.isograph.com/software/reliability-workbench/fault-tree-analysis-software/. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
SAPHIRE homepage. http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/SAPHIRE.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
SZMA homepage. http://www.szma.com/pkasm.shtml. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
Berman, A., Nikolaichuk, O.: Technical state space of unique mechanical systems. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab. 36, 10–16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3103/S105261880
Berman, A.: Formalization of formation processes of failure for unique mechanical systems. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab. 3, 89–95 (1994)
Berman, A., Nikolaychuk, O., Pavlov, A., Yurin, A.: A methodology for the investigation of the reliability and safety of unique technical systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 228(1), 29–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X13494820
Berman, A., Khramova, V.: Automated data base for failures in pipelines and tubular high-pressure apparatus. Chem. Pet. Eng. 29, 63–66 (1993)
Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun. 7, 39–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3233/aic-1994-7104
Bergmann, R.: Experience Management. LNAI, vol. 2432. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Nikolaychuk, O., Yurin, A.: Computer-aided identification of mechanical system’s technical state with the aid of case-based reasoning. Expert. Syst. Appl. 34, 635–642 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Berman, A.F., Nikolaychuk, O.A., Yurin, A.Y. (2019). Computer-Aided Event Tree Synthesis on the Basis of Case-Based Reasoning. In: Abraham, A., Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’18). IITI'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 875. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01821-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01821-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01820-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01821-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)