Abstract
Scholars examine legal hard cases either in the name of justice, or in accordance with the principle of tolerance. In the case of justice, scholars aim to determine the purposes that all the norms of the system are envisaged to fulfil. In the second case, tolerance is conceived as the right kind of foundational principle for the design of the right kinds of norms in the information era, because such norms have to operate across a number of different cultures, societies and states vis-à-vis an increasing set of issues that concern the whole infrastructure and environment of current information and communication technology-driven societies. Yet the information revolution is triggering an increasing set of legal cases that spark general disagreement among scholars: Matters of accessibility and legal certainty, equality and fair power, protection and dispute resolution, procedures and compliance, are examples that stress what is new under the legal sun of the information era. As a result, justice needs tolerance in order to attain the reasonable compromises that at times have to be found in the legal domain. Yet, tolerance needs justice in order to set its own limits and determine whether a compromise should be deemed as reasonable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, Nafeez. 2015. How the CIA made Google (Part I) & Why Google made the NSA (Part II), at https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e and https://medium.com/@NafeezAhmed/why-google-made-the-nsa-2a80584c9c1. Last accessed 15 Mar 2015.
Bingham, Tom. 2010. The rule of law. London: Penguin.
Bobbio, Norberto. 2014. The future of democracy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Castells, Manuel. 2005. Global governance and global politics. Political Science and Politics 38: 9–16.
Durante, Massimo. 2015. The democratic governance of information societies. A critique to the theory of stakeholders. Philosophy and Technology 28 (1): 11–32.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A matter of principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Floridi, Luciano. 2013. The ethics of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014. Toleration and the design of norms. Science and Engineering Ethics, (October): 1–29.
Hart, Herbert L.A. 1961. The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Keohane, Robert O. 2003. Global governance and democratic accountability. In Global governance and democratic accountability, ed. D. Held and M. Koening-Archibugi. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mueller, Milton L. 2010. Networks and states: The global politics of internet governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pagallo, Ugo. 2012. Cracking down on autonomy: Three challenges to design in IT law. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4): 319–328.
———. 2013. The laws of robots: Crimes, contracts, and torts. Dordrecht: Springer.
———. 2015a. The realignment of the sources of the law and their meaning in an information society. Philosophy & Technology 28 (1): 57–73.
———. 2015b. Good onlife governance: On law, spontaneous orders, and design. In The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era, ed. L. Floridi, 161–177. Dordrecht: Springer.
———. 2015c. Cyber force and the role of sovereign states in informational warfare. Philosophy & Technology 28 (3): 407–425.
———. 2017a. The legal challenges of big data: Putting secondary rules first in the field of EU data protection. European Data Protection Law Review 3 (1): 34–46.
———. 2017b. The broken promises of democracy in the information era. In Digital democracy in a globalized world, ed. C. Prints, C. Cuijpers, P.L. Lindseth, and M. Rosina, 77–99. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Pagallo, Ugo, and Massimo Durante. 2016a. The philosophy of law in an information society. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of information, ed. L. Floridi, 396–407. Oxon/New York: Taylor and Francis.
———. 2016b. The pros and cons of legal automation, and its governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation 7 (2): 323–334.
Popper, Karl R. 2013 The open society and its enemies. New introduction by Alan Ryan, essay by E.H. Gombrich, single volume ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reed, Chris. 2012. Making laws for cyberspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, Scott J. 2007. The ‘Hart-Dworkin’ debate: A short guide for the perplexed, Public law and legal theory working paper series, 77. Michigan Law School.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pagallo, U. (2019). The Challenges of Digital Democracy, and How to Tackle Them in the Information Era. In: Berkich, D., d'Alfonso, M. (eds) On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01800-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01800-9_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01799-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01800-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)