Skip to main content

Evaluation of AR Inconsistencies on AR Placement Tasks: A VR Simulation Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality (EuroVR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 11162))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the major challenges of Augmented Reality (AR) is the registration of virtual and real contents. When errors occur during the registration process, inconsistencies between real and virtual contents arise and can alter user interaction. In this paper, we assess the impact of registration errors on the user performance and behaviour during an AR pick-and-place task in a Virtual Reality (VR) simulation. The VR simulation ensured the repeatability and control over experimental conditions. The paper describes the VR simulation framework used and three experiments studying how registration errors (e.g., rotational errors, positional errors, shaking) and visualization modalities (e.g., transparency, occlusion) modify the user behaviour while performing a pick-and-place task. Our results show that users kept a constant behavior during the task, i.e., the interaction was driven either by the VR or the AR content, except if the registration errors did not enable to efficiently perform the task. Furthermore, users showed preference towards an half-transparent AR in which correct depth sorting is provided between AR and VR contents. Taken together, our results open perspectives for the design and evaluation of AR applications through VR simulation frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Azimi, E., Qian, L., Kazanzides, P., Navab, N.: Robust optical see-through head-mounted display calibration: taking anisotropic nature of user interaction errors into account. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 219–220 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892255

  2. Azuma, R., Bishop, G.: Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD. In: ACM Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 197–204 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/192161.192199

  3. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baričević, D., Lee, C., Turk, M., Höllerer, T., Bowman, D.A.: A hand-held AR magic lens with user-perspective rendering. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 197–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402557

  5. Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A survey of augmented reality. foundations and trends\({\textregistered }\). Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8(2–3), 73–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, S.R., Breant, F., Manges, B., Jacoby, R., Adelstein, B.D.: Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency. In: IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 138–145 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1997.583063

  7. Ellis, S.R., Menges, B.M.: Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field. Hum. Factors 40(3), 415–431 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Furmanski, C., Azuma, R., Daily, M.: Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information. In: Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2002, pp. 215–320. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holloway, R.L.: Registration error analysis for augmented reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6(4), 413–432 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holloway, R.L.: Registration errors in augmented reality systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klein, G., Murray, D.: Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces. In: ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 225–234 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2007.4538852

  12. Lee, C., Bonebrake, S., Bowman, D.A., Hollerer, T.: The role of latency in the validity of AR simulation. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 11–18 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2010.5444820

  13. Lee, C., Bonebrake, S., Höllerer, T., Bowman, D.A.: A replication study testing the validity of AR simulation in VR for controlled experiments. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 203–204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336464

  14. Lee, C., Rincon, G.A., Meyer, G., Hollerer, T., Bowman, D.A.: The effects of visual realism on search tasks in mixed reality simulation. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 19(4), 547–556 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nabiyouni, M., Scerbo, S., Bowman, D.A., Höllerer, T.: Relative effects of real-world and virtual-world latency on an augmented reality training task: an AR simulation experiment. Front. ICT 3, 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2016.00034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ragan, E., Wilkes, C., Bowman, D.A., Höllerer, T.: Simulation of augmented reality systems in purely virtual environments. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 287–288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2009.4811058

  17. Ren, D., Goldschwendt, T., Chang, Y., Höllerer, T.: Evaluating wide-field-of-view augmented reality with mixed reality simulation. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 93–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504692

  18. Renner, P., Pfeiffer, T.: Evaluation of attention guiding techniques for augmented reality-based assistance in picking and assembly tasks. In: ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, pp. 89–92 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3030024.3040987

  19. Zhou, F., Duh, H.B.L., Billinghurst, M.: Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: a review of ten years of ismar. In: IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 193–202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romain Terrier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Terrier, R., Argelaguet, F., Normand, JM., Marchal, M. (2018). Evaluation of AR Inconsistencies on AR Placement Tasks: A VR Simulation Study. In: Bourdot, P., Cobb, S., Interrante, V., kato, H., Stricker, D. (eds) Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. EuroVR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01790-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01790-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01789-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01790-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics