Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Does Digital Transformation of Government Lead to Enhanced Citizens’ Trust and Confidence in Government?

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abhichandani T, Horan TA, Rayalu R (2005) EGOVSAT: toward a robust measure of e-government service satisfaction in transportation. In: Remenyi D (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Government (ICEG 2005). Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle JL, Wothke W (1999) Amos 4.0 user’s guide. SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, pp 1995–2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE, Lau F, Myers MD, Nielsen PA (1999) Action research. Commun ACM 42(1):94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch Y (1999) Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Hum Relat 52(4):421–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2012) Social science research: principles, methods, and practices

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunch, N. (2012) Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. (1992) Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. Mixing Methods: Qual Quant Res 57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2004) Social research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns AC, Bush RF (2006) Marketing research. Globalization 1:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (2016) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hirschheim R (2004) A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Inf Syst J 14(3):197–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA, Dawn I (1999) Marketing research: methodological foundations. Cengage Learning, vol 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA, Lacobucci D (2004) Marketing research: methodological foundations, 9th edn. Thomson South-Western, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis J, Hussey R (2003) Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey A, Lee H (1992) A first course in factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2003) Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publication Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashti A, Benbasat I, Burton-Jones A (2009) Developing trust reciprocity in electronic-government: the role of felt trust. In: Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Izmir, Turkey, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2003) The good research guide Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler FJ Jr (2002) Survey research methods. Sage Publications Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable GG (1994) Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 3(2):112–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SB, Salkind NJ (2010) Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 611–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP (2004) Survey methodology. Wiley-IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handb Qual Res 2:163–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Tatham RL, Anderson RE, Black W (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ (2007) Validity and reliability testing of two instruments to measure breast cancer patients’ concerns and information needs relating to radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2(1):43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed S, Al-Shawabkah A (2013) Role of e-government in improving organizational performance in the civil status and passports department of Jordan. Dev Country Stud 3(5):50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Articles p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe KR (1988) Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educ Res 17(8):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javali SB, Gudaganavar NV, Raj SM (2011) Effect of varying sample size in estimation of coefficients of internal consistency

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Christensen L (2008) Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan B, Duchon D (1988) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Q 571–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayam O, Hirsch T (2012) Using social media networks to conduct questionnaire based research in social studies case study: family language policy. J Sociol Res 3(2):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood M, Weerakkody V (2016) Factors affecting citizens’ trust and confidence in government and its relation with transformation of government. In: 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra N, Birks D (2007) Marketing Research: an applied approach, 3rd edn. European Edition, Pearson Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD, Avison D (1997) Qualitative research in information systems. Manage Inf Syst Q (21):241–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf Syst Res 13(3):334–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merolli M, Sanchez FJM, Gray K (2014) Social media and online survey: tools for knowledge management in health research. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management, vol 153. Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Inf Syst Res 12(3):240–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2003) The paucity of multi-method research: a review of the information systems literature. Inf Syst J 13(3):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2002) How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct Equ Model 9(4):599–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam T, Sayogo DS (2011) Who uses e-government?: examining the digital divide in e-government use. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM, pp 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehaves B, Bernd CS (2006) Criticality, epistemology and behaviour vs. design-information systems research across different sets of paradigms. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, AIS

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogier J (2005) The response rates for online surveys—a hit and miss affair. In: 2005 Australasian Evaluations Forum: University Learning and Teaching: Evaluating and Enhancing the Experience, UNSW, Sydney, 28–29 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf Syst Res 2(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2013) SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml Valerie A, Berry Leonard L (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Blenkinsopp J (2011) The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. Int Rev Admin Sci 77(2):254–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R, Maitlis S, Wallace AM (2005) Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. J Organ Behav 26(4):379–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch K (2005) Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H, Robinson B (2007) The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991–2001. Inf Syst J 17(3):251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (1991) Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. Meas Pers Soc Psychol Attitudes 1(3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson C (2002) Real word research. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Said IA, Iaafar NH, Atan R (2015) Assessing accountability in government linked companies: an empirical evidence. Int Bus Manage 9(4):460–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MN (2011) Research methods for business students, 5th edn. Pearson Education India

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MN, Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2011) Research methods for business students, 5th edn. Pearson Education India

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J (2006) Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99(6):323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (2000) Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (2003) Research methods for business: a skill building approach, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13:380–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manage Inf Syst 25(3):99–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. Eur J Inf Syst 15(3):320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (2004) The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS Q 28(1):iii–xii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody V, El-Haddadeh R, Al-Sobhi F, Shareef MA, Dwivedi YK (2013) Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manage 33(5):716–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Applications of case study research. SAGE, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2013) Towards a citizen-centered e-government: exploring citizens’ satisfaction with e-government in China. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University. Available from ProQuest: https://search.proquest.com/openview/779b13a52e70b97e56b8e9f3c7f4419c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

  • Zikmund W, Babin B (2006) Exploring marketing research. Cengage Learning

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brunel Business School, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, London, UK

    Mohamed Mahmood

Authors
  1. Mohamed Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Mahmood .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmood, M. (2019). Research Methodology. In: Does Digital Transformation of Government Lead to Enhanced Citizens’ Trust and Confidence in Government?. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01759-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation