Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 440 Accesses

Abstract

Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson P (1983) Political attitudes in America. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Shanab E, Al-Azzam A (2012) Trust dimensions and the adoption of e-government in Jordan. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD) 4(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Rub S (2006) The impact of information technology on business performance management (The study of the Affairs Agency of Sudanese working abroad for the period (2000–2005). Master’s thesis, University of Science and Technology, Omdurman

    Google Scholar 

  • Albusaidy M, Weerakkody V (2008) Factors influencing e-government implementation progress in Oman: a discussion. In: Proceedings of the 2008 European and Mediterranean conference on information systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Alharbi A, Kang K, Sohaib O (2016) Citizens engagement in e-participation on egovernment websites through swat model: a case of Saudi Arabia

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khouri AM (2012) eGovernment strategies the case of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Eur J ePractice 17:126–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2008) The use of wireless internet parks to facilitate adoption and diffusion of e-government services: an empirical study in Qatar. In: AMCIS 2008 proceedings, p 322

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2010) Factors affecting e-government adoption in the state of Qatar. In: Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean conference on information systems, Abu Dhabi, 12–13 Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shboul M, Rababah O, Ghnemat R, Al-Saqqa S (2014) Challenges and factors affecting the implementation of e-government in Jordan. J Soft Eng Appl 7(13):1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sobhi F, Weerakkody V, Kamal MM (2010) An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government. People, Process and Policy 4(1):14–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaliah Said I, Iaafar NH, Atan R (2015) Assessing accountability in government linked companies: an empirical evidence. Int Bus Manage 9(4):460–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Trust and transformational government: a proposed framework for research. Gov Inf Quart 28(2):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean C (2015) Changing citizen confidence: orientations towards political and social institutions in Australia, 1983–2010. Open Polit Sci J 8(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden WO, Teal JE (1983) Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. J Mark Res 20(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V., and Meijer, A. (2012) ‘A Meta-Theory of E-Government’, In 34th EGPA Conference Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strateg Inf Syst 17(2):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham G, Seifert J, Thorson S (2001) The transformational potential of e-Government: the role of political leadership. In 4th Pan European international relations conference, University of Kent, UK, Sep 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert G, Van de Walle S, Kampen JK (2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. Int Rev Admin Sci 71(2):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens M, Wille A (2008) Deciphering the Dutch drop: ten explanations for decreasing political trust in The Netherlands. Int Rev Admin Sci 74(2):283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2005) Transformational government. Cabinet Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte ER, Woodruff RB, Jenkins RL (1987) Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. J Mark Res 24(3):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf Syst J 15(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter L, Weerakkody V (2008) E-government adoption: a cultural comparison. Inf Syst Front 10(4):473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan CML, Shan-Ling P, Tan C-W (2003) Managing stakeholder relationships in an e-government project. In: Ninth Americas conference on information systems, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen KC, Wei KC, Chen Z (2003) Disclosure, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.422000

  • Churchill GA Jr, Surprenant C (1982) An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. J Mark Res 19(4):491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colesca SE (2009) Understanding trust in e-government. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 3(3):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly M, Wisniewski M, Dalrymple J, Curry A (1995) Measuring service quality in local government: the SERVQUAL approach. Int J Public Sector Manage 8:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M. (2015) The trust deficit—concepts and causes of low public trust in governments. In: Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fourteenth session, 20–24 April 2015, Item 3 of the provisional agenda

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) eGovernment in the European Union 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE (1996) The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose and findings. J Mark 60(4):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson III FV (2009a) Commentary—the economic and statistical significance of stock returns on customer satisfaction. Mark Sci 28:820–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson III FV (2009b) The statistical significance of Portfolio returns. Int J Res Mark 26:162–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Murillo M (2013) Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption? Inf Technol Dev 19(2):151–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D, Balestrini P (2004) Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. Int J Public Sect Manage 17(4):286–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour P, Coffey B, O’Toole K (2015) Trust and knowledge exchange in coastal settings. Aust J Marit Ocean Aff 7(1):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen S (2009) Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Inf Polity 14(3):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawong P, Gao P (2017) Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Inf Technol Dev 23(1):153–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed S, Al-Shawabkah A (2013) Role of e-government in improving organizational performance in the civil status and passports department of Jordan. Dev Country Stud 3(5):50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess AM, Hess MF (2016) The consequences of governance failure for innovation. In: Working paper. Washington and Lee University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller JS, Belanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-government series. The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government. Available at http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/HillerReport.pdf

  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, vol 25. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong H (2013) Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relat Rev 39(4):346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J (2006) Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos 59(1):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2015) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2015. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2016) World Employment and Social Outlook: trends 2016. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2017) World Employment and Social Outlook: trends 2017. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • James O (2009) Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. J Public Adm Res Theor 19(1):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen M, Shu W (2008) Transformational government: basics and key issues: a workshop. In: Proceedings of ICEGOV 2008. Cairo, Dec 2008, pp 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Job J (2005) How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament. Aust Rev Public Aff 6(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampen JK, Maddens B, Vermunt JK, Salminen A (2003) Trust and satisfaction: a case study of the micro-performance. In: Salminen A (ed) Governing networks: networks: EGPA yearbook. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampen JK, De Walle SV, Bouckaert G (2006) Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government. The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward government on evaluations of its performance. Public Perform Manage Rev 29(4):387–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil OE (2011) e-Government readiness: does national culture matter? Gov Inf Quart 28(3):388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan A (2016) Central Bank governance and the role of nonfinancial risk management. In: Working Paper. International Monetary Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Gov Inf Quart 26(1):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai Y-L, Cao L, Zhao JS (2010) The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: a comparison between China and Taiwan. J Crim Justice 38(5):934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional e-government. Gov Inf Quart 18(2):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2007) Search for stage theory in e-government development. Innovation Public Sect 13:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox W, Lilie S (1984) Beyond liberal and conservative. Cato Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood M (2016) Enhancing citizens’ trust and confidence in government through digital transformation. Int J Electron Gov Res 12(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Weerakkody (2014) Digital government diffusion in Bahrain—the role of trust and its influence on adoption. In: Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on information systems, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal R, Hale K, Dotterweich L (2008) Citizen–government interaction and the internet: expectations and accomplishments in contact, quality, and trust. J Inf Technol Polit 5(2):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer AJ, Koops BJ, Pieterson W, Overman S, Tije S (2012) Government 2.0: key challenges to its realization. Electron J e-Government 10(1):59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon MJ, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inf Syst J 15(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FV, Petrescu C (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. Int Rev Admin Sci 77(3):451–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi A, Dadašov R, Fazekas M, Tóth IJ, Kocsis G, Jancsis D, Kortas AM, Kukutschka RMB, Stefavov R, Skolkay A (2016) Public integrity and trust in Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Myeong S, Kwon Y, Seo H (2014) Sustainable e-governance: the relationship among trust, digital divide, and e-government. Sustainability 6(9):6049–6069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam T (2012) Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. Int Rev Admin Sci 78(2):346–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete C (2010) Trust in e-government transactional services: a study of citizens’ perceptions in Mexico and the US. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2010. IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Norquist G (2007) Transparency: the new democracy. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2206f20c-45c9-11dc-b359-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1CiOFLwDp

  • Nye J (1997) In government we don’t trust. Foreign Policy 108:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye J, Zelikow P, King D (1997) Why people don’t trust government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17:460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar A, Weerakkody V, Sivarajah U (2017) Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: a case analysis of universal credit. Int J Inf Manage 37(4):350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R (2009) The transformative impact of e-government on public governance in New Zealand. Public Manage Rev 11(6):751–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamura K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ Sci 6(4):423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orren G (1997) Fall from grace: the public’s loss of faith in government. In: Nye J Jr, Zelikow P, King D (eds) Why people don’t trust government. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman IH, Anouze A, Irani Z, Lee H, Balcı A, Medeni T, Weerakkody V (2011) A new cobras framework to evaluate e-government services: a citizen centric perspective. In: Tgovernment workshop

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA (1991) Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J Retail 67:420–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo TA, Scholl HJ (2002) Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and avoiding risk in large scale e-government projects. In: Hawai’i international conference on system sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters BG (1999) American public policy: promise and performance, 5th edn. Chatham House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pina V, Torres L, Royo S (2009) E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective. Online Inf Rev 33(6):1137–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poister TH, Henry GT (1994) Citizen ratings of public and private service quality: a comparative perspective. Public Adm Rev 54(2):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues G, Sarabdeen J, Balasubramanian S (2016) Factors that influence consumer adoption of e-government services in the UAE: a UTAUT model perspective. J Internet Commer 15(1):18–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmi M, Hasnan N (2016) E-Government technology acceptance analysis of citizens: sultanate of Oman case. Int J Soc Relevance Concern 4(1):13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant A, Lee S (2002) Improving public trust in the voluntary sector: an empirical analysis. Int J Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Mark 7(1):68–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf F (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl HJ (2001) Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. In: Schmidt B, Stanoevska-Slabeva K, Tschammer V (eds) Towards the e-society: e-commerce, e-business and e-government. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott M, Golden W, Hughes M (2004) The implementation of citizen-centred e-government: a stakeholder viewpoint. In: Working paper. Centre for Innovation & Structural Change, National University of Ireland, Galway

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert JW, Chung J (2009) Using e-government to reinforce government—citizen relationships: comparing government reform in the United States and China. Soc Sci Comput Rev 27(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafi AS, Weerakkody V (2009) Understanding citizens’ behavioural intention in the adoption of e-government services in the state of Qatar. In: ECIS, pp 1618–1629

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Govindaluri SM, Gattoufi S (2015) Understanding and predicting the quality determinants of e-government services: a two-staged regression-neural network model. J Model Manage 10(3):325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siau K, Long Y (2005) Synthesizing e-government stage models—a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Ind Manage Data Syst 105(4):443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique W (2016) Critical success factors affecting e-government policy implementation in Pakistan. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 8(1):102–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Lee J (2013) Can social media restore citizen trust in government? In: Public management research conference. Madison, pp 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SC, Teo TS (2009) Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: insights from young adults in Singapore. In: Communications of the association for information systems, vol 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennert JR, Schroeder AD (1999) Stakeholder Analysis. In: Paper presented at the 60th annual meeting of the American society for public administration, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manage Inf Syst 25(3):99–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012) E-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) E-government survey 2014: e-government for the future we want. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2016) E-government survey 2016: e-government in support of sustainable development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner EM (2001) Is Washington really the problem? In: Hibbing JR, Thesis-Morse E (eds) What is it about government that americans dislike? Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle S, Bouckaert G (2003) Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. Int J Public Adm 26(8–9):891–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle S, Van Roosbroek S, Bouckaert G (2008) Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? Int Rev Admin Sci 74(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin GG, Muzzio D, Immerwahr S, Gulick L, Martinez E (2004) Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: an application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City. Public Adm Rev 64(3):331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller P, Weerakkody V (2016) Digital government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation. In Working paper 2. Brunel University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody V, Janssen M, Dwivedi Y (eds) (2009) Handbook of research on ICT enabled transformational government: a global perspective. Information Science Reference, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody V, El-Haddadeh R, Al-Sobhi F, Shareef MA, Dwivedi YK (2013) Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manage 33(5):716–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody V, Omar A, El-Haddadeh R (2016) Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: the lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Gov Inf Quart 33(4):658–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolak J, Palus CK (2010) The dynamics of public confidence in US state and local government. State Polit Policy Quart 10(4):421–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) Results, performance budgeting and trust in government. Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin M, Mattar R (2016) e-Government in Saudi Arabia—an empirical study. BVICAM’s Int J Inf Technol 8(1):944–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouridis S, Thaens M (2003) E-government: towards a public administration approach. Asian J Public Adm 25(2):159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwahr T, Finger M, Müller P (2005) More than digitisation-The transformative potential of e-governance: an exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005, HICSS’05. IEEE, p 127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Mahmood .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmood, M. (2019). Literature Review. In: Does Digital Transformation of Government Lead to Enhanced Citizens’ Trust and Confidence in Government?. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01759-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics