Advertisement

Kautilya Meets Buddha: Arthaśāstra Between the Realpolitik and Moralpolitik of Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire

  • Deepshikha Shahi
Chapter
Part of the Global Political Thinkers book series (GPT)

Abstract

Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire is a remarkable exemplar of Kautilyan ‘Political Realism between realpolitik and moralpolitik’. Noticeably, Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire—as a fusion of realpolitik and moralpolitik—offers a non-Western alternative to the ‘rationalist-reflectivist debate’ on legitimate exercise of power in Eurocentric IR. The rationalist-reflectivist debate on legitimate exercise of power in Eurocentric IR revolves around the diverged doctrines of realpolitik and moralpolitik: as such, ‘realpolitik’ (as in rationalist theories of Classical Realism and Neorealism) legitimizes the exercise of power in international politics even if it has antagonistic tensions with abstract moral-ethical concerns, whereas ‘moralpolitik’ (as in reflectivist theories of Critical International Theory, Feminism, Postmodernism etc.) does not legitimize the exercise of power in international politics if it has antagonistic tensions with abstract moral-ethical concerns. Counter to these diverged doctrines in Eurocentric IR, this chapter sets out to install Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire as a peculiar meeting point of the ‘commonalities’ between two ancient Indian political thoughts: (i) ‘Kautilyan’ (usually depicted as realpolitik); and (ii) ‘Buddhist’ (generally accepted as moralpolitik).

Keywords

Aśoka Kautilyan Buddhist 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (Eds.). (2009). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alekseyeva, T. A. (2016). The Debates About “Great Debates”: How to Structure the Theory of International Relations. Polis-Political Studies, 6, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, C. (2012). Ashoka: The Search for India’s Lost Emperor. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, R. J. (2011). Hannah Arendt’s Reflections on Violence and Power. Iris, 3(5), 3–30.Google Scholar
  6. Bhalachandran, G. (2011). Kautilya’s Model of Sustainable Development. Humanomics, 27(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhargava, R. (2016, March 13–14). Asoka’s Dhamma as Civic Religion: Toleration, Civility, Communal Harmony. Draft prepared for the workshop on Freedom and Harmony organized by Bergrruen Institute of Philosophy and Culture at CASBS, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  8. Bill, J. A. (1997). George Ball: Behind the Scenes in U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Billington, J. H. (1987). Realism and Vision in American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, 65, 630–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloch, J. (1950). Les Inscriptions d’Asoka. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  11. Boesche, R. (2002). Moderate Machiavelli? Contrasting the Prince with the Arthashastra of Kautilya. Critical Horizons, 3(2), 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boesche, R. (2003). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  13. Bologh, R. W. (2010). Love or Greatness: Max Weber and Masculine Thinking—A Feminist Inquiry. Boston: Unwyn Hyman.Google Scholar
  14. Bradley, F. H. (1897). Appearance and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, C. (1992). International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brzezinski, Z. (1973). US Foreign Policy: The Search for Focus. Foreign Affairs, 51(4), 708–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Candy, D. (2008). Peace in the Buddha’s Discourses: A Compilation and Discussion. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  19. Chakravarty, N. (1992). Indian Philosophy: The Pathfinders and the System Builders (700 B.C. to 100 A.D.). New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Chandrasekaran, P. (2006). Kautilya: Politics, Ethics and Statecraft. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/9962/. Accessed 27 May 2018.
  21. Chemburkar, J. (1999). Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra and the Early Dharmasūtras: Some Observations on Rājadharmas. In K. P. Jog (Ed.), Perceptions on Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: In Commemoration of Prof. R.P. Kangle’s Birth Centenary. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
  22. Coady, C. A. J. (2002). The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention. United States Institute of Peace. Available at https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/pwks45.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  23. Collins, S. (1998). Nirvana and Other Buddhist Felicities: Utopias of the Pali Imaginaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cox, R. W. (2005). Global Perestroika. In R. Wilkinson (Ed.), The Global Governance Reader (pp. 140–155). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Cumming, G. D. (2008). UK African Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: From Realpolitik to Moralpolitik? Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 42(1), 106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cummiskey, D. (2015). Comparative Reflections on Buddhist Political Thought: Aśoka, Shambhala, and the General Will. In S. M. Emmanuel (Ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (pp. 536–553). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Drekmeier, C. (1962). Kingship and Community in Early India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dunne, T., & Wheeler, N. J. (2001). The Blair Doctrine. In R. Little & M. Wickham-Jones (Eds.), New Labour’s Foreign Policy (pp. 61–76). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dutta, A., & Dabhade, M. S. (2017). Diplomatic Theory of Kautilya and Sun Tzu: Assessing Interpretations. International Studies, 51(1–4), 162–179.Google Scholar
  31. Falk, R. (1987). The Promise of World Order: Essays in Normative International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Fels, E. (2017). Shifting Power in Asia-Pacific? The Rise of China, Sino-US Competition and Regional Middle Power Allegiance. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Fluck, M. (2017). The Concept of Truth in International Relations Theory: Critical Thought Beyond Post-positivism. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gadkari, J. (1996). Society and Religion: From Rugveda to Puranas. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
  35. Gautam, P. K. (2013). Relevance of Kautilya’s Arthasastra. Strategic Analysis, 37(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gokhale, B. G. (1969). Early Buddhist View of the State. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 89(4), 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gour, C. G. (1965). Institutions Constitutionelles et Politiques du Cambodge. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
  38. Grabowsky, V. (2007). Buddhism, Power and Political Order in Pre-twentieth Century Laos. In I. Harris (Ed.), Buddhism, Power and Political Order (pp. 121–142). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Gray, S. (2014). Reexamining Kautilya and Machiavelli: Flexibility and the Problem of Legitimacy in Brahmanical and Secular Realism. Political Theory, 42(6), 635–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Griffiths, M. (2001). Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Griffiths, M., O’Callaghan, T., & Roach, S. C. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Guruge, A. W. P. (1993). Asoka: A Definitive Biography. Colombo: Ministry of Cultural Affairs and Information, Government of Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  43. Guzzini, S. (2017). Max Weber’s Power. In R. N. Lebow (Ed.), Max Weber and International Relations (pp. 97–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hanh, T. N. (2006). We Have the Compassion and Understanding Necessary to Heal the World. In M. McLeod (Ed.), Mindful Politics: A Buddhist Guide to Making the World a Better Place (pp. 129–139). Boston: Wisdom.Google Scholar
  45. Harris, I. (Ed.). (2007). Buddhism, Power and Political Order. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Henderson, E. A. (2015). African Realism? International Relations Theory and Africa’s Wars in the Postcolonial Era. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Heydarian, R. J. (2015, August 7). Against China: Is the Philippines’ ‘Moralpolitik’ the Right Move? The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/against-china-the-philippines-moralpolitik-the-right-move-13517?page=show. Accessed 5 Mar 2018.
  48. Hirota, D. (2000). Toward a Contemporary Understanding of Pure Land Buddhism: Creating a Shin Buddhist Theology in a Religiously Plural World. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hoover, J. (2015). Ethics and Morality in International Relations. Oxford Bibliographies. Available at http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0119.xml. Accessed 9 Mar 2018.
  50. Hutchings, K. (1999). International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Indrawooth, P. (2004). The Archaeology of the Early Buddhist Kingdoms of Thailand. In P. S. Bellwood & I. Glover (Eds.), Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  52. Iyer, S. (2000). Religion and Economics of Fertility in South India. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge. Available at  https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.16513. Accessed 25 May 2018.
  53. Jackson, P. A. (1989). Buddhism, Legitimation, and Conflict: The Political Functions of Urban Thai Buddhism. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jaede, M. (2017). Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Hobbes’s Natural Law Theory. History of European Ideas, 43(8), 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Janover, M. (2006). The Limits of Forgiveness and the Ends of Politics. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26(3), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jerryson, M. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, J. E., & Johnson, D. J. (1999). Emperor Ashoka of India: What Makes a Ruler Legitimate? Los Angeles: Cobblestone Publishing Company; National Center for History in the Schools (NCHS), University of California.Google Scholar
  58. Johnson, M., & Maiguashca, B. (1997). Praxis and Emancipation: The Lessons of Feminist Theory in International Relations. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 100(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  59. Jonas, G. (2006). America’s Moralpolitik. National Post, 8 (274). Available at https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/132384764?q&versionId=145909305. Accessed 8 Mar 2018.
  60. Kangle, R. P. (1997). The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: A Study (Vol. 3). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Kaye, D. G., & Solem, K. E. (1974). Future Studies and Conflict. Futures, 11, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kee, T. W. (2008). The Fourth Pillar: Power as a Source of Legitimacy. E-International Relations. Available at http://www.e-ir.info/2008/11/24/the-fourth-pillar-power-as-a-source-of-legitimacy/. Accessed 27 June 2018.
  63. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kleingeld, P. (2011). Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kokaz, N. (2004, March 17). Fairness in International Relations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  66. Koret, P. (2007). Past, Present and Future in Buddhist Prophetic Literature of the Lao. In I. Harris (Ed.), Buddhism, Power and Political Order (pp. 143–167). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Kosambi, D. D. (1994). The Culture and Civilisation of Ancient India. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.Google Scholar
  68. Lamb, R. D. (2014). Rethinking Legitimacy and Illegitimacy: A New Approach to Assessing Support and Opposition Across Disciplines. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  69. Langenbacher, E. (2005). Moralpolitik Versus Moralpolitik: Recent Struggles Over the Construction of Cultural Memory in Germany. German Politics and Society, 23(3), 106–134.Google Scholar
  70. Lebow, R. N. (2017). Max Weber and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Leysens, A. (2008). The Critical Theory of Robert W. Cox: Fugitive or Guru? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Liebig, M. (2016). India’s Strategic Culture. Available at http://www.erazvitie.org/english/strategicheskaja_kultura__indii. Accessed 5 Mar 2018.
  73. Liebig, M., & Mishra, S. (2017). The Arthàstra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kauäilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam al-Mulk, Barani and Machiavelli. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.Google Scholar
  74. Ling, L. H. M. (2017, November 22). The Very Fact That You’re Thinking Differently, Is Already an Action. Press Releases. Centre for Global Cooperation Research, University of Duisburg-Essen. Available at https://www.gcr21.org/en/media-resources/press-releases/single-news/info/the-very-fact-that-youre-thinking-differently-is-already-an-action/59e6249fe80e527f1ef3f7626af876f0/. Accessed 27 Mar 2018.
  75. Linklater, A. (1998). The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  76. Linklater, A. (2008). Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Löwenheim, N. (2009). A Haunted Past: Requesting Forgiveness for Wrongdoing in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 35(3), 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Signs, 8(4), 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Malik, P. (2014). India’s Nuclear Debate: Exceptionalism and the Bomb. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martson, J. (2007). The Cambodian Hospital for Monks. In I. Harris (Ed.), Buddhism, Power and Political Order (pp. 104–120). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  82. Michael, A. (2013). India’s Foreign Policy and Regional Multilateralism. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mishra, R. K. (2013). History and Context of Public Administration in India. In M. Sabharwal & E. M. Berman (Eds.), Public Administration in South Asia: India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. London and New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  84. Modelski, G. (1964). Kautilya: Foreign Policy and International System in the Ancient Hindu World. The American Political Science Review, 58(3), 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mohan. C. R. (2006). Impossible Allies: Nuclear India, United States, and the Global Order. New Delhi: India Research Press.Google Scholar
  86. Mookerji, R. (1966). Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  87. Moore, M. J. (2015). Political Theory in Canonical Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 65(1), 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Relations. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Morgenthau, H. J. (1986). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed., revised by K. W. Thompson). New York: A. A. Knopf (Originally published in 1948).Google Scholar
  90. Muniapan, B. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Philosophical Approach from an Ancient Indian Perspective. Indian Culture and Business Management, 1(4), 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Narayan, U., & Harding, S. (Eds.). (2000). Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Narlikar, A., & Narlikar, A. (2014). Bargaining with a Rising India: Lessons from the Mahabharata. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Nazer, H. M. (1999). Power of a Third Kind: The Western Attempt to Colonize the Global Village. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  94. Nye, J. S. (2013). Hard, Soft, and Smart Power. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Diplomacy (pp. 559–576). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Olivelle, P. (2013). King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India: Kautilya’s Arthasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. O’Neill, R. (1982). Strategic Studies and Political Scientists of Strategic Studies and Its Critics Revisited. In C. Bell (Ed.), Academic Studies and International Relations. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  97. Onuf, N. (2014). Rule and Rules in International Relations. Erik Castrén Institute of International Law and Human Rights, University of Helsinki. Available at http://www.helsinki.fi/eci/Events/Nicholas%20Onuf_Rule%20and%20Rules%20%204-2-14.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2018.
  98. Pardesi, M. S. (2005). Deducing India’s Grand Strategy of Regional Hegemony from Historical and Conceptual Perspectives (Working Paper No. 76). Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. Available at https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/rsis-pubs/WP76.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2018.
  99. Peys, C. J. (2018). Derrida, Arendt and ‘Care for the World’: Forgiveness and Cosmopolitanism Reconsidered. Ph.D. thesis. University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
  100. Rangarajan, L. N. (1992). The Arthashastra. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  101. Rich, B. (2008). To Uphold the World. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  102. Roy, K. (2009). Norms of War in Hinduism. In V. Popovski, G. M. Reichberg, & N. Turner (Eds.), World Religions and Norms of War (pp. 30–59). New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Russell-Johnston, D. (2001). Moralpolitik: Speeches and Articles 2001. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  104. Sarkar, B. K. (1919). The Hindu Theory of International Relations. The American Political Science Review, 13(3), 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Schaap, A. (2005). Forgiveness, Reconciliation and Transitional Justice. In Jr. A. F. Lang (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Readings Across the Lines. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Schlichtmann, K. (2016). A Peace History of India: From Ashoka Maurya to Mahatma Gandhi. New Delhi: Vij Books.Google Scholar
  107. Seliktar, O. (2000). Failing the Crystal Ball Test: The Carter Administration and the Fundamentalist Revolution in Iran. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  108. Shamasastry, R. (1915). Kautilya’s Arthashastra. Bangalore: Government Press.Google Scholar
  109. Singh, B. P. (2008). Bahudhā and the Post 9/11 World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Singh, M. P. (2011). Indian Political Thought: Themes and Thinkers. New Delhi: Pearson.Google Scholar
  111. Singh, B. (2017a, September 20). China’s Realpolitik Is Losing Its Sheen. Deccan Chronicle. Available at https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/columnists/200917/chinas-realpolitik-is-losing-its-sheen.html. Accessed 8 Mar 2018.
  112. Singh, U. (2017b). Political Violence in Ancient India. London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sood, R. (2014). Should India Revise Its Nuclear Doctrine? Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament (Policy Brief No. 18). Available at http://apln.anu.edu.au/content/policy-brief-no-18-should-india-revise-its-nuclear-doctrine. Accessed 8 Mar 2018.
  114. Strong, J. S. (1983). Legend of King Asoka: A Study and Translation of the Asokavadana. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Sylvester, C. (2002). Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Thapar, R. (1997). Aśoka and the Decline of the Mauryas. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Thapar, R. (2003). The Penguin History of Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  118. Thapar, R. (2009). Ashoka: A Retrospective. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(45), 31–37.Google Scholar
  119. Tikhonov, V., & Brekke, T. (2013). Buddhism and Violence: Militarism and Buddhism in Modern Asia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tisdell, C. A. (2003). A Western Perspective on Kautilya’s ‘Arthasastra’: Does It Provide a Basis for Economic Science? Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/90523/2/WP%2018.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  121. Tol, G. (2011, September 14). Assessing Turkey’s Moralpolitik. The Middle East Institute. Available at http://www.mei.edu/content/assessing-turkeys-moralpolitik. Accessed 8 Mar 2018.
  122. Walker, R. B. J. (1989, February 5–17). Ethics, Modernity and the Theory of International Relations. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions in International Relations: Implications for Australia, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  123. Walker, R. B. J. (1992). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  125. Warner, D. (1991). An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  126. Weber, M. (1919 [1978]). Politics as a Vocation. A Speech Delivered at Munich University. In W. Runciman (Ed.), Max Weber: Selections in Translation (E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State Is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Whisnant, R., & DesAutels, P. (Eds.). (2010). Global Feminist Ethics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  129. Wiessala, G. (2013). Re-orienting the Fundamentals: Human Rights and New Connections in EU-Asia Relations. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepshikha Shahi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations