Skip to main content

Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra: A Philosophical Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory

Part of the book series: Global Political Thinkers ((GPT))

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra is a source of inspiration for scholars who are interested in conceptualizing Indian IR and/or Global IR. However, when the ‘formulaic principles’ of Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra are used to study specific case-studies in IR, no intellectual attempt is made to ‘qualify’ these formulaic principles by bringing in the insights drawn from the philosophical substructures of Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra—namely, Sāṃkhya, Yoga and Lokāyata (literally meaning ‘numbers’, ‘aggregate’, and ‘worldly ones’ respectively). Due to the neglect of Sāṃkhya, Yoga and Lokāyata as the philosophical foundation of Arthaśāstra (which definitely bears an extra-Political Realist stance), Kautilya is habitually considered as comparable to those Western scholars who are sympathetic to ‘Political Realism as realpolitik’. Against this orthodox trend, this chapter aims to systematically expose the extra-Political Realist elements in the philosophical underpinnings of Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra, thereby reconstructing this classical text as a document of ‘Political Realism between realpolitik and moralpolitik’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, A. (2011). Dialogue and Discovery. In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(30), 619–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altekar, A. S. (1958). State and Government in Ancient India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1966). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (R. Howard & A. B. Fox, Trans.). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A. (1979). Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies. World Politics, 31(2), 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A. (2002). Power and International Relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyaya, J. (1993). A General Theory of International Relations. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel, P. C. (2012). The Samkhya System of the Bhagavata Purana. M.A. thesis, University of Iowa. Available at http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3258. Accessed 17 May 2018.

  • Bell, D. (Ed.). (2008). Political Thought in International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2017). Political Realism and International Relations. Philosophy Compass, 12(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, P. L. (1996). Chandragupta Maurya: A Gem of Indian History. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R. (2011). Studies on the Carvaka/Lokayata. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, P. (2003). What Is the “Subaltern” of the Comparative Philosophy of Religion? Philosophy East and West, 53(3), 340–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesche, R. (2002). Moderate Machiavelli? Contrasting the Prince with the Arthashastra of Kautilya. Critical Horizons, 3(2), 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesche, R. (2003). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst, J. (1983). God in Sāṃkhya. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Sü-dasiens, 27(6), 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, M. (2007). Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capan, Z. G. (2017). Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (2001). The Twenty Years’ Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamola, S. D. (2007). Kautilya Arthashastra and the Science of Management: Relevance for the Contemporary Society. Gurgaon: Hope India Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chande, M. B. (1998). Kautilyan Arthasastra. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyaya, D. (1959). Lokāyata: A Study in Ancient Indian Materialism. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2014). Just War and the Ethics of Espionage. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (1922). A History of Indian Philosophy (Vol. 1). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickstein, J. (2015). Īśvara as He Is: Devotional Theism in the Pātañjala Yogaśāstra. M.A. thesis, University of Colorado. Available at https://scholar.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=rlst_gradetds. Accessed 18 May 2018.

  • Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drekmeier, C. (1962). Kingship and Community in Early India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisikovits, N. (2016). A Theory of Truces. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, C. (2001). Frustration and Fulfillment. Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam, P. K. (2016). Understanding Dharma and Artha in Statecraft Through Kautilya’s Arthashastra. IDSA Monograph Series, No. 53. Available at https://idsa.in/system/files/monograph/monograph53.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2018.

  • Ghoshal, U. N. (1959). A History of Indian Political Ideas: The Ancient Period and the Period of Transition to the Middle Ages. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, K. P. (1998). Kāmākhyā Temple: Past and Present. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. (2014). Reexamining Kautilya and Machiavelli: Flexibility and the Problem of Legitimacy in Brahmanical and Secular Realism. Political Theory, 42(6), 635–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grovogui, S. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 106(3), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, S. (2000). Religion and Economics of Fertility in South India. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge. Available at https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.16513. Accessed 25 May 2018.

  • Jackson, P. T. (2008). Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory. Review of International Studies, 34(1), 129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, K. A. (2008). Kapila: Founder of Sāṃkhya and Avatāra of Viṣṇu. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jai, H. (1999). Lokasamgraha in Kautilya. In K. P. Jog (Ed.), Perceptions on Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: In Commemoration of Prof. R.P. Kangle’s Birth Centenary. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubczak, M. (2008). The Sense of Ego-Maker in Classical Sāṃkhya and Yoga: Reconsideration of Ahaṃkāra with Reference to the Mind-Body Problem. Cracow Indological Studies, 10, 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayatilleke, K. N. (1998). Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, J. (1913). Arthashastra und Dharmashastra. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlän Dischen Gesellschaft, LXVII, 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. G. (Ed.). (2006). Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. V. (1987). Lokāyata in Ancient India and China. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 68(1/4), 393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, M. M. (1998). The Epistemology of the Cārvāka Philosophy. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 46(2), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangle, R. P. (1997). The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: A Study (Vol. 3). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowicz, K., & Julian, W. (2018). Political Realism in International Relations. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  • Karsh, E. (1986). Geographical Determinism: Finnish Neutrality Revisited. Cooperation and Conflict, 21(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayaoglu, T. (2010). Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 12(2), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. B. (1956). A History of Sanskrit Literature. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosambi, D. D. (1994). The Culture and Civilisation of Ancient India. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. J. (1969). Sāṃkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W., & Moravcsik, A. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security, 24(2), 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, M., & Mishra, S. (2017). The Arthàstra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kauäilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam al-Mulk, Barani and Machiavelli. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundborg, T. (2018). The Ethics of Neorealism: Waltz and the Time of International Life. European Journal of International Relations. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118760990. Accessed 21 May 2018.

  • Luoma-Aho, M. (2012). God and International Relations: Christian Theology and World Politics. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2008). The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2009). Can Asians Think? Singapore: Times Book International.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClish, M. (2009). Political Brahmanism and the State: A Compositional History of the Arthaśāstra. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClish, M., & Olivelle, P. (Ed.). (2012). The Arthasastra: Selections from the Classic Indian Work on Statecraft. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. B. (2009). Foreword. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Report of the Workshop on International Studies in India. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, A. (2013). India’s Foreign Policy and Regional Multilateralism. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S. (2017). Rājadharma, Legitimacy and Sovereignty in the Arthaśāstra. In M. Leibig & S. Mishra (Eds.), The Arthaśāstra in a Transcultural Perspective: Comparing Kautilya with Sun-Zi, Nizam al-Mulk, Barani and Machiavelli. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. K., & Liebig, M. (2016). Kautilya’s Arthashastra: An Intellectual Portrait: The Classical Roots of Modern Politics in India. New Delhi: Rupa Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, G. (1964). Kautilya: Foreign Policy and International System in the Ancient Hindu World. The American Political Science Review, 58(3), 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1986). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed., revised by K. W. Thompson). New York: A. A. Knopf (Originally published in 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morkevičius, V. (2018). Realist Ethics: Just War Traditions as Power Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, T. (2017). The New Realism and the Old. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(3), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles, D. P. (2017). Is God Christian? Christian Identity in Public Theology—An Asian Contribution. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olivelle, P. (1998). The Early Upanisads: Annotated Text and Translation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivelle, P. (2013). King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India: Kautilya’s Arthasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orend, B. (2001). A Just-War Critique of Realism and Pacifism. Journal of Philosophical Research, 26, 435–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. V. (2009). Integrating International Relations Studies in India to Global Scholarship. International Studies, 46(1/2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, R. W. (1998). Hindu Ethics: A Philosophical Study. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, R. W. (2007). Sāmkhya-Yoga Ethics. In P. Bilimoria, J. Prabhu, & R. M. Sharma (Eds.), Indian Ethics: Classical Traditions and Contemporary Challenges (Vol. 1). Hampshire and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddar, P. (2016). The Differential Uses of Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra. Akademisk Kvarter, 14, 96–109. Available at http://www.akademiskkvarter.hum.aau.dk/pdf/vol14/8.PremPoddar_TheUsesOfKautilyasArthashastra.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2018.

  • Radhakrishnan, S., & Moore, C. A. (1967). A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangarajan, L. N. (1992). The Arthashastra. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. (2008). A Rose by any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism. Security Studies, 17, 294–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. H. (2012). Is Power Zero-Sum or Variable-Sum? Old Arguments and New Beginnings. Journal of Political Power, 5, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, F. (2015). Power, Knowledge, and Dissent in Morgenthau’s Worldview. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. (2007). Just and Unjust War in Hindu Philosophy. Journal of Military Ethics, 6(3), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B. K. (1919). The Hindu Theory of International Relations. The American Political Science Review, 13(3), 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B. K. (1985). The Positive Background of Hindu Sociology: Introduction to Hindu Positivism. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2009). Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2011). The Realist Case for Global Reform. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. C. (2014). A Realist View of the Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42(2), 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Srinivas, K. (2016). How Do Theories of Cognition and Consciousness in Ancient Indian Thought Systems Relate to Current Western Theorizing and Research? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 343. Available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00343. Accessed 17 May 2018.

  • Sen, A. (1988). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahi, D. (2018). Advaita as a Global International Relations Theory. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shamasastry, R. (1915). Kautilya’s Arthashastra. Bangalore: Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, C. (2000). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. P. (2011). Indian Political Thought: Themes and Thinkers. New Delhi: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. (2016). Evolution of Strategic Culture Based on Sun Tzu and Kautilya: A Civilisational Connect. New Delhi: Knowledge World Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, U. (2017). Political Violence in Ancient India. London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M., & Yudell, Z. (2017). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. A. (1957). The Early History of India. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spegele, R. D. (1987). Three Forms of Political Realism. Political Studies, 35(2), 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakkar, U. (1999). Morality in Kautilya’s Theory of Diplomacy. In K. P. Jog (Ed.), Perceptions on Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: In Commemoration of Prof. R.P. Kangle’s Birth Centenary. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. A. (2003). A Western Perspective on Kautilya’s ‘Arthasastra’: Does It Provide a Basis for Economic Science? Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/90523/2/WP%2018.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.

  • Trautmann, T. R. (1971). Kauṭilya and the Arthaśāstra: A Statistical Investigation of the Authorship and Evolution of the Text. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voina-Motoc, I. (1999). Moral-Rule and Rule of Law in International Politics: Common Sense, Political Realism, Skepticism. In ‘A Decade of Transformation’, IWM Junior Visiting Fellows Conferences (Vol. 8). Vienna. Available at http://www.iwm.at/wp-content/uploads/jc-08-021.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  • Wæver, O. (1998). The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization, 52(4), 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (2018). US Grand Strategy After the Cold War: Can Realism Explain It? Should Realism Guide It? International Relations, 32(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1919 [1978]). Politics as a Vocation. A Speech Delivered at Munich University. In W. Runciman (Ed.), Max Weber: Selections in Translation (E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winternitz, M. (1923). Kautilya and the Art of Politics in Ancient India. Vishva Bharati Quarterly, 1(3), 265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shahi, D. (2019). Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra: A Philosophical Reconstruction. In: Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory. Global Political Thinkers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01728-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics