Technical Female: A Gender Studies Academic in Silicon Valley



What social, economic and material conditions prompt innovations in academic writing? How does the university create time and space for research, reflection and composure? Is a campus environment the only place where writing has such an important role in creating a measure of professional status? Can academics engage with the world beyond the conference circuit and classroom? This chapter is an attempt to answer these questions that have preoccupied my writing over many years, both within and outside the university. I document changes that transpired from my doctoral research and early blogging experiments through to the book publications that enabled me to move careers and countries. Throughout, academic writing is shown to be the primary way I have expressed and transcended the constraints of specific professional locations. Reflecting on this history, the chapter concludes with observations on the role of academic writing in the high-pace technology industry.


  1. Barcan, R. (2013). Academic life and labour in the New University: Hope and other choices. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text (S. Heath, Trans.). London, UK: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, R. (2005). The neutral: Lecture course at the College de France (1977–1978) (R. Krauss & D. Hollier, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berlant, L. (2007, December 25). Faceless book. Supervalent Thought.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bruns, A., & Jacobs, J. (2006). Uses of blogs. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Flaherty, C. (2015, September 9). Public goodbyes. Inside Higher Ed.
  8. Forsythe, D. E. (2001). Studying those who study us: An anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neoliberal academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gregg, M. (2006a). Cultural studies’ affective voices. London, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregg, M. (2006b). Feeling ordinary: Blogging as conversational scholarship. Special Issue of Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregg, M. (2009). Banal Bohemia: Blogging from the ivory tower hot-desk. Convergence, 15(4), 470–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregg, M. (2011). Work’s intimacy. London, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Gregg, M., & Burgess, J. (2006). Counter-heroics and counter-professionalism in cultural studies. Special Issue of Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20(2), 145–223.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication., 2(2), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayot, E. (2018). The sky is falling. Profession.
  17. Lupton, D., Mewburn, I., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (2017). The digital academic: Critical perspectives on digital technologies in higher education. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Merchant, B. (2017). The one device: The secret history of the iPhone. New York, NY: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  19. Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walker, J. (2006). Blogging from inside the ivory tower. In A. Bruns & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Uses of blogs (pp. 127–138). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Warner, M. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wolfe, T. (1983, December). The tinkerings of Robert Noyce: How the sun rose on the Silicon Valley. Esquire Magazine, pp. 346–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Client Computing GroupIntel CorporationHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations