Making Sense of Reflexivity: A Posthumanistic Account
- 578 Downloads
This chapter provides a posthumanistic account in which we, two PhD students, work to make sense of our entanglements with reflexivity on our way to becoming academic researchers and writers. We question the concept of sensemaking as a cognitive process, and we look for ways in which sensemaking is unfolding from sociomaterial practices carried out in and around the work of academia. Considering sensemaking a material-discursive practice and applying duo-ethnographic and collaborative writing as a methodology, three practices – (1) conducting an article-based dissertation, (2) writing a research diary and (3) taking part in academic events – form the basis for analysis of our entanglements with reflexivity. We outline how the micro-entanglements of sociomateriality came to matter (in both senses of the word) to and for us as we engage with our becomingness as reflexive researchers and academic writers.
We wish to thank the reviewers, whose comments and suggestions helped us to improve this chapter further.
- Bains, P. (2002). Subjectless subjectivities. In B. Massumi (Ed.), A shock to thought: Expressions after Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 10–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Burke, K. (1965). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
- Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Fox, N. J. (2013). Comparison of post-structuralist, critical realist and neo-materialist perspectives. Unpublished material. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5536917/Comparison_of_post-Structuralist_critical_realist_and_neo-materialist_perspectives_Table. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.
- Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2018). New materialism. In P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont, M. A. Hardy, & M. Williams (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of research methods. London, UK: Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320016117
- Gherardi, S. (2017). Sociomateriality in posthuman theory. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations and practitioners (pp. 38–51). London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hammarström, M. (2010). On the concepts of transaction and intra-action. In The Third Nordic Pragmatism Conference, Uppsala, Sweden. Retrieved from https://internt.ht.lu.se/media/documents/persons/MatzHammarstrom/On_the_Concepts_of_Transaction_and_Intra_action.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.
- Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2004). Hidden and null curricula of sexual orientation: A dialogue on the Curreres of the absent presence and the present absence. In L. Coia, N. J. Brooks, S. J. Mayer, P. Pritchard, E. Heilman, M. L. Birch, & A. Mountain (Eds.), Democratic responses in an era of standardization: Papers from the 4th curriculum & pedagogy annual conference (pp. 139–159). Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.Google Scholar
- Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. E. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography. Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Books.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, R. D., & Norris, J. (2009). Duoethnography: Articulations/(re)creation of meaning in the making. In W. Gershon (Ed.), Working together in qualitative research: A turn towards the collaborative (pp. 127–140). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, R. D., & Norris, J. (2013). Understanding qualitative research: Duoethnography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Speedy, J., & Wyatt, J. (Eds.). (2014). Collaborative writing as inquiry. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Making sense of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar