Working with Text(-ures) in Academia: Be Fast, Even While Standing Still!



This chapter takes elements from a wool-felting sequence in a Norwegian master’s program as a starting point. We explore variations of moving fast and slow into sequences of felting, reading and writing. Our previous work with toddler pedagogy acts as inspirational forces when working to counteract the dominating discourses promoting teleology and economic efficiency in higher education. By orienting ourselves towards ‘the minor’ (Manning, The minor gesture. Duke University Press, Durham/London, 2016) in reading/writing practices, we experiment with any occurring speculative proposition that emerge in the midst of the reading/writing processes, as such propositions seem to present unforeseeable potentialities. We plug into Deleuze and Guattari’s (Rhizome. On the line. Semi(o)texte, New York, 1983) paradoxical notion of being fast, even while standing still. The text may be read as an ongoing inaugural, in a Derridean sense (2009).



We want to thank the master students who made it possible to experiment cooperatively with woollen and linguistic text(-ures).


  1. Davies, B. (2010). The implications for qualitative research methodology of the struggle between the individualised subject of phenomenology and the emergent multiplicities of the poststructuralist subject: The problem of agency. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Rhizome. On the line. New York, NY: Semi(o)texte.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2006). Dialogues II. London, UK/New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967).Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (2009). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.). London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  9. Duclos, V., Criado, T. S., & Nguyen, V.-K. (2017). Speed: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, 32(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faulkner, S. L. (2016). The art of criteria: Arts criteria as demonstration of vigor in poetic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(8), 662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson, L., Honan, E., & Loch, S. (2016). The production of the academicwritingmachine. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 7(2), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2013). Deleuze’s children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(3), 272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, A. Y. (2003). Rhizovocality. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kristiansson, A. (2018). Bokpoesi. Retrieved September 9, 2017.
  16. Manning, E. (2009). What if it didn’t all begin and end with containment? Toward a leaky sense of self. Body & Society, 15(3), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manning, E. (2015). Writing space. In WTF affect. Interview with E. Manning. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  18. Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC/London, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act. Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN/London, UK: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze. An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Sullivan, S. (2009). From stuttering and stammering to the diagram: Deleuze, Bacon and contemporary art practice. Deleuze Studies, 3(2), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olsson, L. M. (2012). Eventicizing curriculum: Learning to read and write through becoming a citizen of the world. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(1), 88–107.Google Scholar
  23. Reinertsen, A. B. (2016). The embrained body of a child: On neurodidactics and edusemiotic 21st century becoming machines. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reinertsen, A. B. (2019, in press). The end of criticism producing unconscious: Non-personal activist academic writing. In L. Thomas & A. B. Reinertsen (Eds.). Academic writing and identity constructions: Performativity, space and territory in academic workplaces. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, L. (2001). Getting personal: Writing-stories. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Sandvik, N. (2018, Online First). When the whole sky falls down: Minor gestures towards play out of place/time in toddler groups. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1–13.
  28. Somerville, M. J. (2008). ‘Waiting in the chaotic place of unknowing’: Articulating postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(3), 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ulla, B. (2017). Reconceptualising sleep: Relational principles inside and outside the pram. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(4), 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ulla, B., Sandvik, N., Larsen, A. S., Nyhus, M. R., Johannesen, N. (2019, in press). Eventicizing curriculum in higher education: Trusting flashes of turbulans. In A. Bayley & C. A. Taylor (Eds.), Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationØstfold University College (ØUC)HaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations