Advertisement

The End of Criticism Producing Unconscious: Non-personal Activist Academic Writing

Chapter

Abstract

My focus is transcorporeality, affects and gut feelings and/as academic writing. I ask how writing as a technical object, can become an ordinary path that never gives up on “optative”, i.e., that by which every problem, can be thought and reflected upon according to its multiple dimensions, and, as such, should then be resolved? Such activist writing implies a scientific move from hermeneutics and phenomenology to affirmation in immanence, directing attention to non-personal moments of reassessment highlighting the importance of Higher Education as stratified assemblages; as networked real/virtual spaces; as poetic poly-critical edusemiotics. It is a metaphysics of quality traversing knowledge as non-teleological thus a de facto end of criticism. This is my non-expressive poetic practice and virtual essay about how an academic might emerge.

References

  1. Christensen, I. (2006). It (S. Nied, Trans.). New York, NY: New Directions Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Colebrook, C. (2017). What is this thing called education? Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton. Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, G. (2004). Foucault. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. (2006). Immanence: A life in two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (Ed. D. Lapoujade). New York, NY: Semiotex(e).Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). On the line (J. Johnston, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam, & E. R. Albert, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Denzin, N. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography. In Qualitative research methods (Vol. 17). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1992). The other heading: Reflections on today’s Europe (P-A. Brault & M. B. Naas, Trans.). Bloominhgton, IN/Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. De Waal, E. (2013). The hare with amber eyes. (Norw: Haren med øyne av rav). Oslo: Forlaget Press.Google Scholar
  13. Krell, D. F. (2000). The purest of bastards: Works of mourning, art, and affirmation in the thoughts of Jacques Derrida. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lapadat, J. (2002). Mixed messages. Quesnel, BC/Prince George, BC: Caitlin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Levinson, M. (1998). Posthumous critique. In N. B. Dirks (Ed.), In near ruins: Cultural theory at the end of the century. Minneapolis, MN/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Manning, E. (2015). Mot Metode (Against Method), (A. B. Reinertsen, Trans.). In A. M. Otterstad & A. B. Reinertsen (Eds.), Metodefest og øyeblikksrealisme [Methodfestival and moments of realism] (pp. 121–132). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  18. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Reinertsen, A. B. (2008). My Norwegian Lusekofte. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(2), 283–298.Google Scholar
  20. Reinertsen, A. B. (2016). A Phaedrus Baroque art of maintenance or constant fabulating qualia becoming quality. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(1), 112–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949115627909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Semetsky, I. (2017). Edusemiotics: A handbook. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Pte Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simondon, G. (1958/2012/2017). On the mode of existence of technical objects. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Trifonas, P. P. (2000). The ethics of writing: Derrida, deconstruction, and pedagogy. New York, NY/Oxford/Lanham, MD/Boulder, CO: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Weil, S. (2009). Waiting for God (E. Craufurd, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
  25. Wilde, O. (2007). The critic as artist: Upon the importance of doing nothing and discussing everything. New York, NY: Mondial Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Maud University CollegeTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations