Advertisement

Writing Together at a Distance

Chapter
  • 571 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider concepts of space and place in relation to academic writing. Arising from a flow of emails, ideas/thoughts/feelings began to emerge in-between us as two academics. Located separately, both geographically and institutionally, our writing emerged from mo(ve)ments – both physically and affectively. One of us moved institutions, the other moved out of academic institutions. We found ourselves needing to re-make/re-consider/re-create our spaces and places in which to do the work of ‘academia’, and ‘re-be/come’ as academics in these new spaces. Through this there was a seeking out of mo(ve)ments of connections. A seeking to engage in the task of academic writing capable of embracing mo(ve)ments of becoming-academic, rather than ‘being’ academic. In so doing, the chapter engages with minor writing to disrupt/disturb striated forms of academic writing and enable multiple ways of being and becoming as academic.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzaldúa, G. (2015). Light in the dark/Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. (2013). Foucault, power and education. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, A., Crimmins, G., & Henderson, L. (2017). Positioning ourselves in our academic lives: Exploring personal/professional identities, voice and agency. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1398135
  5. Bogue, R. (2004). Deleuze’s wake: Tributes and tributaries. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bosanquet, A. (2018, May 3). Notes on privilege. The slow academic. Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://theslowacademic.com/2018/05/03/notes-on-privilege/
  7. Bright, D. (2018). Signs to be developed: Experiments in writing. In S. Riddle, D. Bright, & E. Honan (Eds.), Writing with Deleuze in the academy: Creating monsters. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. London, UK: Athlone.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972–1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York, NY: Urzone.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2014). Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2016). Resilience, apps and reluctant individualism: Technologies of self in the neoliberal academy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haraway, D. (2015). Antropocene, capitalocene, pantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harré, N. (2016). The infinite game of higher education. Paper presented at Academic life in the measured university: Pleasures, paradoxes and politics. The International Academic Identities Conference 2016. University of Sydney. Retrieved June 7, 2018, from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/arts/documents/university-as-an-infinite-game.pdf
  19. Harré, N., Grant, B., Locke, K., & Sturm, S. (2017). The university as an infinite game: Revitalising activism in the academy. Australian Universities’ Review, 59(2), 5–13.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, L. (2011). Encounters with life: The learning of three early childhood teachers working in an independent school. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, L. (2018a). Shifting sands: Writing across time. In S. Riddle, D. Bright, & E. Honan (Eds.), Writing with Deleuze in the academy: Creating monsters (pp. 141–159). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson, L. (2018b). I am the compliant academic. In A. Black & S. Garvis (Eds.), Women activating agency in academia: Metaphors, manifestos and memoir (pp. 185–201). Milton Park, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Henderson, L., & Black, A. (2018). Splitting the World open: Writing stories of mourning and loss. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(4), 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson, L., Black, A., Jones, J., & Crimmins, G. (in review). Sharing our names and remembering our her-stories. In G. Crimmins (Ed.), Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Henderson, L., Honan, E., & Loch, S. (2016). The production of the academicwritingmachine. Reconceptualising Educational Research Methodology, 7(2), 4–18.Google Scholar
  26. Henderson, L., Nuttall, J., Kriegler, L.-A., & Schiele, H. (2016). A spatial re-consideration of the early childhood-school relationship. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(6), 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016/1158960.
  27. Honan, E., Bright, D., & Riddle. (2018). Bringing monsters to life through encounters with writing. In S. Riddle, D. Bright, & E. Honan (Eds.), Writing with Deleuze in the academy: Creating Monsters (pp. 8–18). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Honan, E., Henderson, L., & Loch, S. (2015). Producing moments of pleasure within the confines of an academic quantified self. Creative Approaches to Research, 8(3), 44–62.Google Scholar
  29. Ingold, T. (2000). Making culture and weaving the world. In P. Graves-Brown (Ed.), Matter, materiality and modern culture (pp. 63–180). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Massumi, B. (2014). Translator’s foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (Eds.), Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Piotrowski, M. (2017). Writing in cramped spaces. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 8(3), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.2552
  34. Protevi, J. (2011). Larval subjects, autonomous systems and E. Coli chemotaxis. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 29–52). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, A. (2010). In theory: Why Deleuze (still) matters: States, war-machines and radical transformation, Ceasefire. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/in-theory-deleuze-war-machine/
  36. St. Pierre, E. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Stagoll, C. (2005). Event. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 87–88). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. The Thesis Whisperer. (2018, May 2). Slow academia is for the privileged – but then – isn’t all academia? Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://thesiswhisperer.com/2018/05/02/slow-academia-is-for-the-privileged-but-then-isnt-all-academia/
  39. Thomas, L. M. (2016). Data as constant becomings-collapsing dichotomous divides of data and researcher in identity construction work. In A. B. Reinertsen (Ed.), Becoming earth; a post human turn in educational discourse collapsing nature/culture divides (pp. 41–51). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, L. M., & Reinertsen, A. B. (2016). Writing matters in leadership practice. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology: Special Issue on Leadership and Writing Organizations, 7(2), 85–100. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/rerm/issue/archive
  41. Ulmer, J. (2017). Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations