Skip to main content

Staging Recovery as Home Work in Rachel’s House

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Performing Dream Homes
  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

In her discursive study of the domestic, Glover details the creation of Rachel’s House, a play crafted out of verbatim excerpts from interviews with residents of a residential community recovery program in the Franklinton neighborhood of Columbus, Ohio. In the play, Rachel’s House is a domestic space constructed and enacted through the labor of talk—what Glover calls home work. It is also a space for experimentation and recovery, made manifest through the iterative process of self-narration, an activity explicitly presented as the essential labor of this home. Glover shows how Rachel’s House is not separate from, but always in contact with, the conditions that make it necessary, and how its performance invites the audience into a home where risk and recovery are fundamental to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Performances took place at the Ohio Reformatory for Women in Marysville, as well as three locations around Columbus.

  2. 2.

    Rachel’s House boasts an anti-recidivism rate of 86% among all residents, including those who complete the program as well as those who leave before completing the program. According to the most recent available measures from the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (2017) the average anti-recidivism rate in the state is 70%.

  3. 3.

    Patricia O’Brien, Making It in the “Free World”: Women in Transition from Prison (New York: SUNY Press, 2001), 14–15.

  4. 4.

    Recently, contributions to the literature have worked to correct the overgeneralization of men’s experiences on to formerly incarcerated women’s. For further information, see Maycock/Sheridan, O’Brien, Ahmed, and Salem et al.

  5. 5.

    Paula Maycock and Sarah Sheridan, “At ‘Home’ In Prison? Women and the Homelessness-Incarceration Nexus,” Irish Probation Journal 10 (Oct 2013): 135.

  6. 6.

    National Health Care for the Homeless Council, p. 1.

  7. 7.

    “Belle” is an alias, as are all names in the play.

  8. 8.

    The name of the home and community recovery program “Rachel’s House” is an explicit reference to the Old Testament passage Jeremiah 31:15. “A Voice is heard in Ramah, mourning and great weeping, Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.”

  9. 9.

    Amanda Stewart Fisher, “Trauma, Authenticity and the Limits of Verbatim,” Performance Research 16, no. 1 (2011): 117.

  10. 10.

    Alison Forsyth, Introduction to The Methuen Drama Anthology of Testimonial Plays (London: Bloomsbury, 2014), 2–3.

  11. 11.

    Linda Alcoff, “The Problem of Speaking for Others,” Cultural Critique no. 20 (Winter 1991–1992): 30.

  12. 12.

    Several of the people whose stories were represented in the play were in the audience for the May 2014 performances as well. Residents did not participate in rehearsals, performances, or talkbacks due to the importance of their continued anonymity to their recovery and safety, though several spoke with McCartney and the performers portraying them.

Works Cited

  • Alcoff, Linda. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique, no. 20, Winter 1991–1992, pp. 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Research and Evaluation. “Recividism Update – 2017.” Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Amanda Stewart. “Trauma, Authenticity and the Limits of Verbatim.” Performance Research, vol. 16, no. 1, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, Alison. The Methuen Drama Anthology of Testimonial Plays. Bloomsbury, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maycock, Paula and Sheridan, Sarah. “At ‘Home’ In Prison? Women and the Homelessness-Incarceration Nexus.” Irish Probation Journal, vol. 10, October 2013, pp. 118–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, Nicola. Rachel’s House. Multiple drafts, April 2013–May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Care for the Homeless Council. “Incarceration and Homelessness: A Revolving Door of Risk.” In Focus: A Quarterly Research Review of the National HCH Council, vol. 2, no. 2, November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Patricia. Making It in the “Free World”: Women in Transition from Prison. SUNY Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamas, Sophie. “Writing Trauma: Collisions at the Corner of Art and Scholarship.” Theatre Topics, vol. 22, no. 1, March 2012, pp. 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glover, J. (2019). Staging Recovery as Home Work in Rachel’s House. In: Klein, E., Mobley, JS., Stevenson, J. (eds) Performing Dream Homes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01581-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics