Abstract
There has been considerable debate as to whether linguistic and world knowledge are dissociable and make distinguishable contributions to language comprehension (e.g. Hagoort et al. in Science 304:438–441, 2004; Warren & McConnell in Bulletin & Review 14:770–775, 2007). To address this question, we related people with aphasia’s performance on independent tests of event knowledge and linguistic knowledge to their sensitivity to violations of selectional restrictions and possibility in a self-paced reading task, using materials from Warren et al. (Lang Cognit Neurosci 30(8):1–8, 2015). Results suggested that better performance on a task designed to index verb argument structure knowledge predicted increased sensitivity to selectional restriction violations, whereas better performance on a task designed to index event knowledge predicted increased sensitivity to possibility violations. Consistent with previous findings, this pattern provides evidence that behavioral responses to violations of linguistic and event knowledge may diverge. The relationships between sensitivity to violations and task performance additionally support the assumption that selectional restrictions are a feature of verb knowledge, whereas possibility is a feature of event knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bak, T. H., & Hodges, J. R. (2003). Kissing and dancing–a test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation. Preliminary results in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00011-8.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verbs and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern assessment of verbs and sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26(10), 1250–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/026887038.2012.693584.
Chomsky, D. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dickey, M. W., & Warren, T. (2015). The influence of event-related knowledge on verb-argument processing in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 67, 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.003.
Dillon, B., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (2014). Pushed aside: Parentheticals, memory, and processing. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.866684.
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montagues’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidle.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037.
Dresang, H. C., Dickey, M. W., & Warren, T. (submitted). Semantic memory for objects and events: A novel test of event-related conceptual semantic knowledge.
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095455.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182.
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 516–547. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2728.
Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Frazier, L. (1987). Theories of sentence processing. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding (pp. 291–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution (1st ed., pp. 275–293). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39(2), 170–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/411200.
Kertesz, A. (2006). Western aphasia battery-revised. Toronto: Pearson Assessment.
Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2000). Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2315.
Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). Verb deficits in Alzheimer’s disease and agrammaticism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 88(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00147-0.
Lei, C., Dresang, H., Holcomb, M., Warren, T., & Dickey, M. W. (2016). Neural bases of semantic-memory deficits for events. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3026–3031).
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022964.
McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R., & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(2–3), 137–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386835.
McRae, K., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., & Ferretti, T. (2005). A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1174–1184.
McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2009). People use their knowledge of common events to understand language, and do so as quickly as possible. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00174.x.
Milburn, E., Warren, T., & Dickey, M. W. (2016). World knowledge affects prediction as quickly as selectional restrictions: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(4), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1117117.
Paczynski, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). Multiple influences of semantic memory on sentence processing: Distinct effects of semantic relatedness on violations of real-world event/state knowledge and animacy selection restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(4), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003.
Pylkkänen, L., Oliveri, B., & Smart, A. J. (2009). Semantics vs. world knowledge in prefrontal cortex. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(9), 1313–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903120176.
R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistic computing [Computer software]. 536 Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistic Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B., & Liversedge, S. (2004). The effects of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Incorporated.
Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). CAT: Comprehensive aphasia test. Psychology Press.
Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2007). Investigating effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eye movements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 770–775. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196835.
Warren, T., McConnell, K., & Rayner, K. (2008). Effects of context on eye movements when reading about plausible and impossible events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.1001.
Warren, T., Milburn, E., Patson, N. D., & Dickey, M. W. (2015). Comprehending the impossible: What role do selectional restriction violations play? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1047458.
Willits, J. A., Amato, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2015). Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colvin, M., Warren, T., Dickey, M.W. (2019). Event Knowledge and Verb Knowledge Predict Sensitivity to Different Aspects of Semantic Anomalies in Aphasia. In: Carlson, K., Clifton, Jr., C., Fodor, J. (eds) Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01563-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01563-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01562-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01563-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)