Abstract
A plethora of practical suggestions could be considered to make pedagogy smarter, more active, and attractive to students while simultaneously being efficient and obtaining results. Creative suggestions are not always innovative. In order to achieve innovation, an interesting method is proposed by Jean-Charles Cailliez and described here, consisting of four main steps: (i) following the path indicated by Boethius and Thomas Aquinas in the Middle Ages to acquire a mens ingeniosa, a kind of creative imagination resulting in inspiration, properly obtained from a few conditions and possibilities, restricted by appropriate observations, and underpinned by correct prospections; (ii) insight and enlightenment for the ideation of creativity will be greatly facilitated by co-design within a team; (iii) after the ideation, generated by inspiration, then comes the time for implementation, that is, creating prototypes of projects in an interactive manner and generating pedagogical actions capable of being tested by experimentation; and (iv) innovation, when the idea materializes itself and may be carried out and be useful. Nevertheless, innovation requires steps of its own, such as incubation, creation of a pilot project, testing, acquiring value, and devising possible uses. For any hypothetical use of an idea, creativity indicates when, how, and in which contexts we should use it. Next, we must design an experiment in order to know how efficient of a pedagogical strategy it is and, eventually, have such resource available for specific, didactic goals. Pedagogy should not be centered only on unique and exclusive resources, but ensure an articulated relationship with other resources. A final discussion is proposed considering whether a smart pedagogy will require smart technologies, with some indications about the importance of the role of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in such innovation scenarios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Borba, M., & Villareal, M. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization (Springer, Ed.). New York: Springer.
Borge, N. (2016). Artificial intelligence to improve education/learning challenges. International Journal of Advanced Engineering & Innovative Technology, 2(6), 10–13.
Cailliez, J. C. (2017). La Classe Renversée: L’innovation pédagogique par le changement de posture [The flipped classroom: Educational innovation through postural change] (Ellipses, Ed.). Paris: Ellipses.
Carr, N. G. (2011). A Geração Superficial: O que a internet está fazendo com os nossos cérebros [The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains]. Rio de Janeiro: Agir.
Carreira, S. (2009). Matemática e tecnologias–Ao encontro dos “nativos digitais” com os “manipulativos virtuais” [Math and technologies – toward to the “digital natives” with the “virtual manipulatives”]. Quadrante–Revista de Investigação Em Educação Matemática, 8(1), 53–85.
de Carvalho, J. F. (2015). A gênese da bomba [The genesis of the nuclear bomb]. Estudos Avançados, 29, 197–208. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142015000200197&nrm=iso
de Certeau, M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien 1: Arts de faires [The invention of everyday life 1: Arts of doing]. Paris: Gallimard.
Dedehayir, O., & Steinert, M. (2016). Technological forecasting & social change the hype cycle model: A review and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005
Dennett, D. C. (1997). Tipos de Mentes [Kinds of Minds]. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Rocco.
Depraz, N. (2011). Compreender Husserl [Understanding Husserl]. (Vozes, Ed.). Petrópolis-RJ: Vozes.
Hadamard, J. (2009). Psicologia da Invenção na Matemática [Psychology of invention in mathematics] (Contraponto, Ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Komis, V., Romero, M., & Misirli, A. (2017). A scenario-based approach for designing educational robotics activities for co-creative problem solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 560, 158–169. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Margarida_ROMERO/publication/315066572_A_Scenario-Based_Approach_for_Designing_Educational_Robotics_Activities_for_Co-creative_Problem_Solving/links/59c82ac20f7e9bd2c0146b8d/A-Scenario-Based-Approach-for-Designing-Educational-Robotics-Activities-for-Co-creative-Problem-Solving.pdf
Lévi-Strauss, C. (2012). La pensée sauvage [The wild thinking] (12a ed.). Campinas-SP: Papirus.
Maffesoli, M. (2009). A República dos Bons Sentimentos [The republic of good feelings] (Iluminuras, Ed.). São Paulo: Iluminuras.
Manacorda, M. A. (2006). História da Educação: da Antiguidade aos nossos dias [History of education: From ancient era to our days] (Cortez, Ed.) (12a ed.). São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez.
Medeiros, L. F., Moser, A., & Santos, N. (2014). A simulação computacional como técnica de pesquisa na administração [The computational simulation as a research technique in management]. Revista Intersaberes, 9(especial), 441–459.
Mitra, S. (2008). O Furo na Parede [The hole in the wall: Self-organizing systems in education] (SENAC, Ed.). Rio de Janeiro: SENAC.
O’Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill-A radical approach to child rearing (H. P. Company, Ed.). New York: Company, Hart Publishing.
Papert, S. (2008). A Máquina das Crianças: repensando a escola na era da informática [The children’s machine: Rethinking the school in the age of the computer]. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Paty, M. (2001). A criação científica segundo Poincaré -Einstein [The scientific creation according with Poincaré-Einstein]. Estudos Avançados, 15, 157–192. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142001000100013&nrm=iso
Plato. (2011). Phaedrus (Martin Claret, Ed.). São Paulo, Brazil: Martin Claret.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rancière, J. (2002). O mestre ignorante: Cinco lições sobre a emancipação intelectual [The ignorant master: Five lessons on intellectual emancipation] (Autêntica, Ed.). Belo Horizonte.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy (Constable, Ed.). London: Constable.
Romano, M., & Cifelli, R. (2015). 100 years of continental drift. Science, 350(November), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6230
Rothenberg, A. (1995). Creative cognitive processes in Kekule’s discovery of the structure of the benzene molecule. The American Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422898
Siqueira, A. (1943). Filosofia da Educação [Philosophy of education] (Vozes, Ed.). Petrópolis-RJ: Vozes.
Teachthought. (2014). 10 roles for artificial intelligence in education. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com/the-future-of-learning/10-roles-for-artificial-intelligence-in-education/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moser, A., de Medeiros, L.F. (2019). Toward a Smart Pedagogy: Devising a Methodology for Innovation. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01550-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01551-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)