Advertisement

Generation, Calculation and Interpretation of Social Impacts with the Social Analysis of SEEbalance®

  • Peter SalingEmail author
  • Ana Alba Perez
  • Peter Kölsch
  • Thomas Grünenwald
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

Measuring sustainability is an important prerequisite for making strategic decisions. BASF has developed several instruments to evaluate sustainability whereby the utilization of each method depends on the concrete purpose or issue in question. The new Social Analysis will contribute to this setup by assessing social impacts along the value chain.

The Social Analysis is implemented in the SEEbalance® calculating results with the Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and with a specific Social Hot Spot Assessment. Both approaches generate, calculate and interpret the social impacts from different perspectives. Different levels and approaches of data generation and calculation are used for drawing conclusions on the social performance of product alternatives fulfilling the same functional unit. The close link to the environmental life cycle assessment enables practitioners a holistic view on sustainability aspects which in turn support decision-making processes.

For the assessments, processes and decision trees to harmonize the generation of coherent results were developed and will support the data generation process. Different levels of interpretation of findings leading to overall results support and harmonize the interpretation of the findings significantly.

Keywords

Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) Social Hot Spot Analysis Interpretation of results Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Social impacts 

References

  1. 1.
    Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Kraemer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Schmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S. Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF – The method. Int J LCA. 2002;7(4):203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P. Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch CO. SEEbalance – managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF, Greener Management International, Greenleaf publishing Sheffield, S. Seuring (guest editor), Issue 45, Spring 2004, 79–94.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kölsch D, Saling P, Kicherer A, Grosse-Sommer A. How to measure social impacts? What is the SEEbalance® about? – socio-eco-efficiency analysis: the method. Int J Sustain Dev. 2008;11(1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saling P, Grosse-Sommer A, Alba-Perez A, Kalisch D. Using the eco-efficiency analysis and SEEbalance in the sustainability assessment of products and processes. In: Sustainable neighbourhood, from Lisbon to Leipzig through research, 4th BMBF-forum for sustainability, Leipzig, Germany, May 2007, pp 8–10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saling P, Pierobon M. Measuring the sustainability of products: The eco-efficiency and SEEbalance® analysis, LCM 2011, Berlin, http://www.lcm2011.org/papers.html, 21.11.2011.
  6. 6.
    Krueger C, Saling P. Chemistry powers sustainability, plenary at LCM 2017, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontes J, Bolhuis A, Bogaers K Saling P, van Gelder R, Traverso M, Das Gupta J, Bosch H, Morris D, Woodyard D, Bell L, van der Merwe R, Laubscher M, Jacobs M, Challis D. Handbook of product social impact assessment. http://product-social-impact-assessment.com. 2016. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
  8. 8.
    WBCSD, Alvarado C Brown A, Hallberg K, Nieuwenhuizenn P, Saling P, Chan K, Das Gupta J, Morris D, Nicole G, Wientjes F, Dierckx A, Garcia W, Combs C, Kilgore A, Satterfield B, Haver S, Jostmann T, Vornholt G, Bergman U, Feesch J, Whitaker K, Kiyoshi M, Govoni G, Mehta R, Menon A, Sen S, Upadhyayula V, Bande M, Coërs P, Debecker D, Poesch J, Viot JF. Social life cycle metrics for chemical products – A guideline by the chemical sector to assess and report on the social impact of chemical products, based on a life cycle approach, November 2016, www.wbcsd.org/contentwbc/download/1918/24428, Accessed 30 Nov 2017, ISBN 978–2–940521-52-4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, Paris, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Traverso M, Bell L, Saling P, Fontes J. Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2016;23:597–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ecovadis. http://www.ecovadis.com/de/uber-uns/. Accessed 8 May 2018.
  12. 12.
    Reprisk®. https://www.reprisk.com/. Accessed 8 May 2018.
  13. 13.
    Verisk Maplecroft. https://www.maplecroft.com/. Accessed 8 May 2018.
  14. 14.
    “Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden (INEF)”. Internal working document for human right violation severity. (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Saling
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Alba Perez
    • 1
  • Peter Kölsch
    • 1
  • Thomas Grünenwald
    • 1
  1. 1.BASF SE, Sustainability StrategyLudwigshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations