Skip to main content

Structure of a Net Positive Analysis for Supply Chain Social Impacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science ((BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL))

Abstract

Net Positive may well be the buzzword of this decade. Beyond the noise, it has the potential to be a transformational movement, helping businesses to redefine their role in society, their social purpose. As an idea, it simplicity and candor make it both extremely attractive and powerful. It poses a great question and sets a challenge: Can we give more to the environment and society than we take? To be Net Positive a company (and its supply chain) handprint needs to be greater than its footprint. The Net Positive Project and Harvard SHINE have worked to clarify the Principles and methodology that can make the Net Positive concept both actionable and valid. This include defining handprints in a measurable way. In this paper, we are developing on the methods that can be used to assess the social Net Positive impacts. Reviewing and building on social life cycle assessment, we introduce a structure for Net Positive analysis of social impacts. This framework is meant to be practical, actionable and inclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/blackrock-ceo-larry-fink-just-sent-a-warning-to-ceos-everywhere-2018-1

References

  1. Norris GA. Net positive methodology. White Paper; 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. UN Environment, Guidelines for Providing Product Sustainability Information. 2017. http://www.scpclearinghouse.org/resource/guidelines-providing-product-sustainability-information. Accessed 23 Jan 2018

  3. United Nations. UN guiding principles on business and human rights. 2011. www.ohchr.org%2FDocuments%2FPublications%2FGuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1eXHpXS2jxinTbBidRBbsn. Accessed 23 Jan 2018

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;15(2):156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, Paris; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jørgensen A. Social LCA, a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;8(2):296–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S, Petti L. Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):406–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekener E, Hansson J, Gustavsson M. Addressing positive impacts in social LCA — discussing current and new approaches exemplified by the case of vehicle fuels. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;23(3):556–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin KLF, Colwill JA, Young RIM. Expanding the scope of LCA to include ‘Societal Value’: a framework and methodology for assessing positive product impacts. Procedia CIRP. 2015;29:366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontes J, Bolhuis A, Bogaers K, Saling P, van Gelder R, Traverso M, Tarne P, Das Gupta J, Morris D, Woodyard D, Bell L, van der Merwe R, Kimm N, Santamaria C, Laubscher M, Jacobs M, Challis D, Alvarado C, Duclaux C, Slaoui Y, Culley H, Zinck S, Stermann R, Carteron E, Gupta A, Nilsson S, Gaasbeek A, Goedkoop M, Evitts S,et al. Handbook for product social impact assessment version 3.0. 2016. http://product-social-impact-assessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Handbook-for-Product-Social-Impact-Assessment.pdf., Accessed 23 Jan 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Revéret JP, Couture JM, Parent J. Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu S, editor. Social life cycle assessment, environmental footprints and eco-design of Products and Processes. Singapore: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciroth A, Franze J. LCA of an ecolabeled notebook – Consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. http://www.greendelta.com/uploads/media/LCA_laptop_final.pdf., Accessed 23 Jan 2018

  13. Ugaya CML, Brones F, Corrêa S, S-LCA: preliminary results of natura’s cocoa soap bar, http://www.lcm2011.org/papers.html?file=tl_files/pdf/paper/13_Session_Life_Cycle_Sustainability_Assessement_I/6_Ugaya-S-LCA_Preliminary_results_of_Naturas_cocoa_soap_bar-763_b.pdf Accessed 23 Jan 2018

  14. Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L. Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol. 2012a;16(5):680–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2012b;17(8):1068–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Benoit Norris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Norris, C.B., Norris, G.A., Azuero, L., Pflueger, J. (2020). Structure of a Net Positive Analysis for Supply Chain Social Impacts. In: Traverso, M., Petti, L., Zamagni, A. (eds) Perspectives on Social LCA. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01508-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics