Advertisement

Structure of a Net Positive Analysis for Supply Chain Social Impacts

  • Catherine Benoit NorrisEmail author
  • Gregory A. Norris
  • Lina Azuero
  • John Pflueger
Chapter
  • 134 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

Net Positive may well be the buzzword of this decade. Beyond the noise, it has the potential to be a transformational movement, helping businesses to redefine their role in society, their social purpose. As an idea, it simplicity and candor make it both extremely attractive and powerful. It poses a great question and sets a challenge: Can we give more to the environment and society than we take? To be Net Positive a company (and its supply chain) handprint needs to be greater than its footprint. The Net Positive Project and Harvard SHINE have worked to clarify the Principles and methodology that can make the Net Positive concept both actionable and valid. This include defining handprints in a measurable way. In this paper, we are developing on the methods that can be used to assess the social Net Positive impacts. Reviewing and building on social life cycle assessment, we introduce a structure for Net Positive analysis of social impacts. This framework is meant to be practical, actionable and inclusive.

References

  1. 1.
    Norris GA. Net positive methodology. White Paper; 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UN Environment, Guidelines for Providing Product Sustainability Information. 2017. http://www.scpclearinghouse.org/resource/guidelines-providing-product-sustainability-information. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    United Nations. UN guiding principles on business and human rights. 2011. www.ohchr.org%2FDocuments%2FPublications%2FGuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1eXHpXS2jxinTbBidRBbsn. Accessed 23 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;15(2):156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, Paris; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jørgensen A. Social LCA, a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;8(2):296–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S, Petti L. Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):406–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekener E, Hansson J, Gustavsson M. Addressing positive impacts in social LCA — discussing current and new approaches exemplified by the case of vehicle fuels. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;23(3):556–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shin KLF, Colwill JA, Young RIM. Expanding the scope of LCA to include ‘Societal Value’: a framework and methodology for assessing positive product impacts. Procedia CIRP. 2015;29:366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fontes J, Bolhuis A, Bogaers K, Saling P, van Gelder R, Traverso M, Tarne P, Das Gupta J, Morris D, Woodyard D, Bell L, van der Merwe R, Kimm N, Santamaria C, Laubscher M, Jacobs M, Challis D, Alvarado C, Duclaux C, Slaoui Y, Culley H, Zinck S, Stermann R, Carteron E, Gupta A, Nilsson S, Gaasbeek A, Goedkoop M, Evitts S,et al. Handbook for product social impact assessment version 3.0. 2016. http://product-social-impact-assessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Handbook-for-Product-Social-Impact-Assessment.pdf., Accessed 23 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Revéret JP, Couture JM, Parent J. Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu S, editor. Social life cycle assessment, environmental footprints and eco-design of Products and Processes. Singapore: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ciroth A, Franze J. LCA of an ecolabeled notebook – Consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. http://www.greendelta.com/uploads/media/LCA_laptop_final.pdf., Accessed 23 Jan 2018
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L. Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol. 2012a;16(5):680–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2012b;17(8):1068–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Benoit Norris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregory A. Norris
    • 1
  • Lina Azuero
    • 2
  • John Pflueger
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard School of Public HealthCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Dell TechnologiesRound RockUSA

Personalised recommendations